It feels a little insulting to say this to someone who has openly reidentified and spoken about their journey. I am a vocal skeptic of transition in many cases and how transition is often used as a form of "easy way out" versus dealing with nonconformity and homophobia. To blame the individuals involved for "making mistakes" and ignore the possible critiques they may have is ignorant and harmful, and I am not here to tolerate any of that whatsoever.
- Many things can be used to "rationalise away uncomfortable or otherwise complicated feelings around [their] sexuality". For example, there are situations in which gay individuals wrongly decide they are trans instead and change their minds later. This does not make the thing itself homophobic- it may however indicate that the user, using it incorrectly, themselves holds rooted homophobic beliefs. That's an issue that isn't caused by the split attraction model, and I am quite sure it would not be solved by somehow abolishing it.
- Calling yourself homoromantic + asexual or whatever is an awful way of rationalising away being gay, because... It's still gay. Unless everyone using these terms is unbelievably dumb I think they'd have noticed that.
The split attraction model is also what allows for the sort of person to go "well I would fuck a girl but I'd NEVER date one!" to rationalise internalised homophobia into a whole new microidentity.
I can and will be critical of these things when they repeatedly screw over people in being true to themselves. This is one of them.
I'm not sure why my throwaway was something to drag into some big snarky post but I don't particularly care. I will be back with hopefully more happy news the next time someone in this thread decides to poke the hive.