hellohey, there was a bit of discussion regarding lgbtq+ theory earlier on this page and i kind of wanted to bring that up again. personally i’ve had a hard time knowing where to start when it comes to this— the only “mainstream” theorist i’ve heard of is judith butler whom i have heard can be inaccessible at times. i feel like others are in the same boat of getting all their knowledge from youtubers like contrapoints and philosophy tube, who are still great but can’t fully replace actual books.
so mostly i had 2 questions for this thread:
thanks!
- which theory books/essays do you recommend?
- what types of ideas does lgbtq+ theory generally cover? earlier on this page that article about experiences as a nonwhite lgbtq+ person and the discussion of how “coming out” is treated in contemporary society was really thought-provoking and made me think about stuff i’d never really paid any mind to before. it’s like there’s a whole new world of ideas out there so i would appreciate a rough map.
judith butler is as fine a starting point as any
for me and i'm sure many others, they were a pivotal and essential gateway into "trans theory"
but if you do dig into their works, it's probably important to note that the theory of gender you'll find, particularly in their earlier works, is in many ways not a popular one today
in those texts, you'll get a picture of gender as performance or as "performativity," but today, many do not understand their genders as performative but rather as an inner feature of subjectivity (in other words, not something you do, but something you find out about yourself)
this can be a touchy subject so i will not dig too much into it here, i only bring it up as a sort of preliminary matter to keep in mind as you read butler's stuff
also no one needs to be ashamed of getting their information from youtubers or any other sort of alternative medium
there is nothing sacred about theoretical texts, they are just one of many ways to tell stories that are worth hearing
and unfortunately at times when one is confined to texts it can feel like there is a "barrier to entry" of all the prerequisite readings required to understand what the hell a sentence like "the body is a site where regimes of discourse and power inscribe themselves, a nodal point or nexus for relations of juridical and productive power" is supposed to mean
i don't claim to have any sort of definitive roadmap for this -- i suspect no one follows exactly the same sequence of readings -- but i can speak from my own experience: i started with beauvoir's second sex (we read this with sartre in my continental phil class, but sartre probably isn't necessary to understand it), then foucault's history of sexuality (again, it may help to read some other foucault as well, but probably not necessary), and then butler's gender trouble, and then just kind of kept going from there. as others have mentioned, it is by no means necessary to read all of this stuff start to finish; there are summaries and commentaries in text and video form all over the internet that will convey the core ideas just fine
hope this helps
Last edited:





























