Or reintroduce that selection glitch from Sword/Shield that allowed you to evolve them even when they didn't meet the gender conditions.Please make a soldier bee and simp lizard evolutions, free us from the pain.
Or reintroduce that selection glitch from Sword/Shield that allowed you to evolve them even when they didn't meet the gender conditions.Please make a soldier bee and simp lizard evolutions, free us from the pain.
Textually, the reason male Salandit can't evolve is because they're too submissive towards females - they end up malnourished because they give everything to the females instead of taking care of themselves:Please make a soldier bee and simp lizard evolutions, free us from the pain.
Male Salandit will be able to evolve when they're holding a Super Donation item that causes a Salazzle in battle to thank them personally.Textually, the reason male Salandit can't evolve is because they're too submissive towards females - they end up malnourished because they give everything to the females instead of taking care of themselves:
The males will do whatever the females tell them. They give the females most of their food. Due to malnutrition, the males can't evolve. (Ultra Sun)
Salazzle's Sun entry also says "For some reason, only females have been found." without really suggesting that we know for sure only females can evolve in a vacuum
(They're implicitly just better at it because the dex says only females have the pheromones that let them manipulate other Salandit this way)
But uh, I think if a male Salandit were to evolve, it would have to be by overcoming this behavior and not simping for the females any more, and the evolved form should probably reflect this rather than still being the simp lizard
What I'm saying is that you cAN'T prove a gay male Salandit that has better self-care couldn't also evolve into Salazzle it's possible in my heart
Or by being force-fed.But uh, I think if a male Salandit were to evolve, it would have to be by overcoming this behavior and not simping for the females any more, and the evolved form should probably reflect this rather than still being the simp lizard
U...um? uh? wellOr by being force-fed.
"Evolves by being given an Aguav/Figy/Iapapa/Mago/Wiki Berry while at full health."
They love such evolution methods so why not?
It's the same Game Freak that thought it was a brilliant idea that, for a game made for children, your Pokémon decide that the time you want to make a sandwich is an amazing time to breed.U...um? uh? well
I can tell you didn't think this through, but um, I think the idea of literally force-feeding someone and presenting it as an easy way to "fix" their eating habits and make them healthier is extremely creepy and uncomfortable in a lot of ways, and the idea that this should be rewarded and presented as a necessary part of Salandit's growth for the sake of emphasizing a joke you think is funny does not at all send a good or like. safe. message,
while "evolves into its best self by learning better ways to take care of itself" is a completely valid way around the issue,
so u m, would kinda rather not personally
let's go back to gay lizards
I JUST WANT TO EVOLVE MY SHINY BEEI'm always in favour of an idea that can be summarised as 'gay lizards' but I'm also realistic haha. Male Combee and Salandit evolutions would be fun but they'd also completely erase the identity of Vespiquen and Salazzle unless they were designed as explicitly weaker mons, perhaps offering some kind of support to their female counterparts in Doubles. This is unlikely to happen because it's virtually impossible to design a Combee evolution that's worse than Vespiquen after 6+ generations of power creep.
If they're independently powerful then the whole queen bee/reverse harem dynamic is completely obliterated and you've inadvertently done a neckbeard-y men's rights thing, like 'female Pokemon being stronger than male Pokemon in a way that references real-world biology? Not on my watch >:('
Also the same Game Freak who promotes standing on swivel chairs.It's the same Game Freak that thought it was a brilliant idea that, for a game made for children, your Pokémon decide that the time you want to make a sandwich is an amazing time to breed.
The difference is that this just has accidental but harmless and comedic implications about having sex at picnicsIt's the same Game Freak that thought it was a brilliant idea that, for a game made for children, your Pokémon decide that the time you want to make a sandwich is an amazing time to breed.
You say that but my first thought when I saw the breeding mechanic on the Scarlet ROM was dubbing it as "Pokemon Voyeur".I thought it was pretty well-established at this point that Eggs kinda just magically appear out of nowhere and that immediately jumping to "Pokemon are having sex at my picnic and it's inappropriate for children!' says more about you than it does about Game Freak or any hypothetical children
Gay lizardsWhat did I wake up to?
Aaaanyway... I've noticed that a lot of Gen 9 Pokémon's Japanese names are just two words put together. Otoshidori (Bombirdier) is "to drop + bird". Namiiruka (Finizen) is "ordinary/wave + dolphin". Mototokage (Cyclizar) is "moto(r) + lizard". It would've been so easy to make those last two portmanteaus. The Paradox Pokémon's names are supposed to be unusual for just being descriptions, so why do these normal Pokémon's names fit that criteria?
Aaaanyway... I've noticed that a lot of Gen 9 Pokémon's Japanese names are just two words put together. Otoshidori (Bombirdier) is "to drop + bird". Namiiruka (Finizen) is "ordinary/wave + dolphin". Mototokage (Cyclizar) is "moto(r) + lizard". It would've been so easy to make those last two portmanteaus. The Paradox Pokémon's names are supposed to be unusual for just being descriptions, so why do these normal Pokémon's names fit that criteria?
Sorry to chime in on the topic after it was quashed for awkward replies, but I slept through it and have some legitimate contributions to chip in before it's buried pages back.I'm always in favour of an idea that can be summarised as 'gay lizards' but I'm also realistic haha. Male Combee and Salandit evolutions would be fun but they'd also completely erase the identity of Vespiquen and Salazzle unless they were designed as explicitly weaker mons, perhaps offering some kind of support to their female counterparts in Doubles. This is unlikely to happen because it's virtually impossible to design a Combee evolution that's worse than Vespiquen after 6+ generations of power creep.
Now I'm picturing a termite Pokémon with gendered evolutions. (Fun fact: apparently people used to think eusocial insects were led by "kings", until someone cut open a "king" ant and saw ovaries.)There's no "King Bee" suggested to exist because they have no reason or potential to change into a form (in the wild I imagine most Female Combee would never evolve either)
I guess the logic is that the Herb is consumed to make the attack skip the charge turn, and it only checks for failure when the Damage has to interact with Protect.In Gen V at least (probably the same in at least a few of the others, but this is just where I've noticed it) if a defending Pokemon successfully uses Protect and its opponent uses a move such as Fly or Solarbeam while holding a Power Herb, the Power Herb is consumed even though the move will of course fail, wasting the item.
However if the attacking Pokemon is using a move boosted by a gem, the move will fail before the gem is consumed, so the item will not be wasted.
It's actually something that's worked out in my favour since one of my squad has a Fighting Gem and two of them have been making use of Protect. But all the same, it bothers me.