Hard disagree here. I'll copy what I posted in council here, which is Fishious is less problematic than Bolt Beak and my suggest approach is to suspect/QB Bolt Beak and not suspect/suspect Fishious.I think we should quick ban Fishous, Suspect Bolt Beak.
There is no equivalent Ash-Greninja for Electric-types, and that makes it harder to abuse, there is a natural immunity to it in Ground-typing, shared by common Pokémon like Zygarde-C, and Groudon-P.
You cannot argue that Desolate Land counts as a complete check for certain, bc you could slow pivot in the Primordial Sea user and nullify it by coming in next. So it’s a draw for those abilities.
Lets call a spade a spade: Fishious is vicious.
We don’t see STAB Electric Bolt Beak abusers besides Zekrom, since it’s the only electric with decent Atk, and he isn’t that popular. Fishous is seen on Greninja and we have other abusers like Shift Gear Gyrados-Mega, scarf Kyogre-P, and Shift Gear Swampert-Mega all able to use it if they want.
Even Arceus-Water can use it, and rose up the ranks as a necessity to handle it.
By comparison, Arceus-Electric just became Unranked.
Bolt Beak is coverage, not overpowered STAB that pushes it over the edge.
Some moves are great, but it’s ultimately the Pokémon that can use them that make them overpowered.
With Bolt Beak, who pushes it over the edge? Maybe a suspect can tell us if it even is.
With Fishious Rend, we already know the answer.
The key thing here is that Fishious is only rarely used for coverage on very specific mons (Zacian-C primarily) while Bolt Beak is the premier coverage move in the meta. Saying that Fishious has a better abusers STABwise is not really saying much when it's one abuser in Ash Greninja offensively (Arceus-Water and Poison Heal Waters are not offensive breakers) against multiple abusers in MMY, Deo-A, Zacian-C, PDon, MMX, DGZ.
Bolt Beak has far superior offensive coverage than Fishious, and its notable that the resists and immunities are not important here because you can use other coverage moves for those. Bolt Beak hitting the common Flying- and Water-types in the meta is much superior to Fishious hitting Rock-, Fire-, and Ground- types (Defensive mons it's Yveltal POgre Waterceus Ho-Oh Gyara Slowbro Lugia Steela vs Ho-Oh Fireceus TTar Darm-Z Steelix, with the former mons being far more common and difficult to break past otherwise (hitting the 2 weakness Water-type, for example). Bolt Beak's existence single handedly reduces the viability of certain mons such as Celesteela and Lugia while causing an increased usage of Volt Absorb and making Steelix a viable alternative Steel, while Fishious hasn't really impacted the meta significantly apart from making PDon even more popular and teams running FC more (which is not just for Fishious but also for Bolt Beak as well).
Bolt Beak's raw power and common place on offensive mons such as MG MMY/Deo-A Zac-C etc has meant that checks like Arceus formes, Cresselia, Zamazenta-C, or anything with similar bulk needs to be consistently at near full HP or be Prankster to not get 2HKOed by the move. This also means that many would-be checks that have less bulk than 120/120 are invalidated, which imo is problematic. If Bolt Beak was gone and one were to substitute Fishious in then its important to note that they must run a different coverage move for Water- and Flying- types such as Arceus-Water and Yveltal and thus lose out on coverage for something else. (BTW this means that if these offensive mons needed to break something they still have the option to so its not a massive buff to "stall" before someone comments on that, while if you want electric coverage there is indeed still Volt Tackle/Bolt Strike.
TLDR Bolt Beak is so much better as coverage than Fishious and Fishious really only has 1 offensive abuser that can be argued as problematic. Do something about Bolt Beak and then wait for meta to settle before suspecting/not suspect Fishious.
Last edited: