The voting was good. Giving them an easy out was bad. Asek's vote was ass.How? Asek said a similar thing about his pancake vote. And you told me that I should vote to pressure people.
The voting was good. Giving them an easy out was bad. Asek's vote was ass.How? Asek said a similar thing about his pancake vote. And you told me that I should vote to pressure people.
Not the only reason i'm lynching you, check my earlier statement tyvm.
Also texas/empoof, can you give your thoughts on snyde / pancake, overall scumreads on those two, etc.
For page 7. Blazade's the goatVote Count
OH SHIT BLAZADE'S DOING VOTECOUNTS NOW
Dentricos (3): Oddish., OM Room, Josh
pancake (1): Asek
Oddish (1): Empoof
Josh (1): Gale Wing SRock
Jalmont (1): Haruno
OM Room (1): Jalmont
Asek (1): Thetwinmasters
Not Voting: Dentricos, pancake, shubaka17, Steven Snype, Texas Cloverleaf
Null on both. pancake hasn't given me enough to make any kind of actual judgement on him; snype is acting consistently with how I know him to be OOG but not in a way that gives me any particular indication on his mafia playNot the only reason i'm lynching you, check my earlier statement tyvm.
Also texas/empoof, can you give your thoughts on snyde / pancake, overall scumreads on those two, etc.
Then why didn't you call him out?The voting was good. Giving them an easy out was bad. Asek's vote was ass.
My reaction to Josh was a reaction to bullshit lol
hey Dentricos what did you edit in your post? just wanna make sure i didn't miss anything you said
Reaction testingI just don't understand what he's trying to do.
My reaction to Josh was a reaction to bullshit lol
Makes sense. Who do you read as of this exact moment?
Also oddish that empoof lynch makes little sense
Point of order I wasn't aware this was a thing, there's a post of mine on page (3? iirc) that shows the last edited by tag and it is currently reflecting the original information i posted as it was quoted before I went to edit for clarityGood Catch, Jalmont. This is your one warning, guys, editing posts in NOC games is not OK.
He's said he understood where I was coming from when I said I didn't want to vote earlier, but then he decided to vote me later on anyway. I decided to make a vote to get a reaction, and he said it was scummy. Yet Asek did the same thing, and he didn't call him out. I don't understand what's going on. It's confusing and upsetting because I don't want to vote Empoof, but this all just feels so weird to me.Makes sense. Who do you read as of this exact moment?
Also oddish that empoof lynch makes little sense
Obviously not, you'd been acting shady leading up to an apparent slip which paints you in a fairly negative lightJosh is ur only reason for the lynch because I said scum chat when it was obvious what I meant? I recently used those words in chat mafia/this forum game so its not like they would be out of my vocabulary.
I feel this(Also I guess this is an appeal to emotion but I'll say it anyway I've been having a shitty af morning hahaha)
hey Dentricos what did you edit in your post? just wanna make sure i didn't miss anything you said
Dentricos - Share your reads on Hoodies?
Do you mean my thoughts on empoof and Josh? Not too much has been said in our chat.
Josh was paying attention to early game because he told me how to quote properly (which I appreciated). During this time he hadn't said anything in chat though which comes off as a bit scummy. When I asked why he wasnt talking in chat he wasnt there. Soon after empoof lynched him xd I kinda want to see more from him, which he said was coming :}
but you saying I was active in hood chat and ignoring the thread was just a plain lie made to make me look scum.
The fact you said scum chat leads me to believe you're in a scum chat and mixed them up because that error doesn't make much sense otherwise.
There is a scum chat btw so banning somebody u think is scum from your chat isn't really a scummy thing to do no?
I find it very likely that him saying no 3 maf village was a slip. http://www.smogon.com/forums/thread...of-team-tropiuses.3583802/page-4#post-7017180 he didn't even quote right the first time, he had to reread the post and it took him way more time than was needed. If he was comfortable enough to say confidently that there were no 3 maf hoods then I'd have thought he'd have a source ready, not take ages and have the wrong source.
Those who believe that the solos would contain at least one mafia: why do you believe that? Do you think it's more or less likely that there are one or more neighbourhoods with two mafias? In the case that you believe the solos are part scummy, what are your reads on jalmont and myself? What are the implications of either read?
Ideally answer now and/or after jalmont starts posting again
Why did the posts speculating on the mafia numbers among solos lead you to question how you are being read?Elaborate please? Considering the lack of information available at said states of the game I'm not sure I'm following your logic
Particularly in the latter case I dont think that analysis makes sense, there had been a solid 5 posts of people speculating on the mafia numbers among the solos but no rationale as to why, not sure where attempting to force discussion on that becomes scummy. Although if you hadn't considered that rationale then I guess it might look as self information fishing?