you guys should read #179 texas posts about looking for inconsistent behavior and he reads dentricos 50/50 after extremely inconsistent behavior and a blatant scum slip?
Are you ignoring my reads post where I say that I think dentricos has been acting very scummy but I'm hesitant because it's a perfect mafia bus a Shitty town situation?you guys should read #179 texas posts about looking for inconsistent behavior and he reads dentricos 50/50 after extremely inconsistent behavior and a blatant scum slip?
How is it a good mafia bus when there is a 0% chance he is town at this pointAre you ignoring my reads post where I say that I think dentricos has been acting very scummy but I'm hesitant because it's a perfect mafia bus a Shitty town situation?
Yep you're ignoring that
Are you seriously 100% confident he's mafia all the time in every situation? I'm not. I think its a viable option that he's just a shitty mafia player and mafia can take advantage of that to bump off a town in the cases where he's a shitty town player.How is it a good mafia bus when there is a 0% chance he is town at this point
three part fun okay. I think dentricos a slip of the mind, in they forgot not everybody has access to scum chat. this casts extra suspicion on the rest of that neighborhood (it's somewhere in the flood but I can't find it) fulfilling the Max One (1) Neighborhood With Multiple Scum, leading into part two.Can you elaborate on this? I want you to answer the question you posed. What do you think?
If you don't know Gale's meta, shouldn't you be neutral on Texas's read and not necessarily disagree with it? You said the read is lost on you, so what exactly has Gale done to make you disagree with Texas's read?
You mentioned the "general grouping of me." How do you feel about this group?
Alright I'll put my money where my mouth isI mean he took 20 minutes to say what he edited out even though he was posting in between lol
I never wrote wall posts in nocthree part fun okay. I think dentricos a slip of the mind, in they forgot not everybody has access to scum chat. this casts extra suspicion on the rest of that neighborhood (it's somewhere in the flood but I can't find it) fulfilling the Max One (1) Neighborhood With Multiple Scum, leading into part two.
grouping! okay so I heavily dislike thetwinmaster's play this game, coming in when he feels like it and posting mostly one liners. this alone is Scummy, but if I'm not mistaken this is also very different from his previous NOC game where wall posts galore and in depth analysis on who's who. bring in my distrust of anyone who has a big brand (such as MetaGame Mafia Winner) and twin fills in a scum slot. however, dentricos' neighborhood has already filled the one (1) slot. this makes oddish part of a Good Group. sorry for looking at setup for clears, but I'm Bad at Mafia, and math is much better for me.
then the gale/Texas meta. I'm concerned that the majority of the read is "you're acting inconsistent with how you used to play, SCUM!" sort of read it is. iirc it's 80/20 scum/town read which is Ridiculous when dentricos has been floppy just this game and is only 50/50. if the basis had more than just "ur better than this" I'd be less accusatory, but that's? the? whole? read? including "I'm extremely suspicious of his attempts to cast suspicion on my reads and/or character as I would be of anyone who attempts to do so to someone most people had town readparticularly exacerbated in the absence of sound logical reasoning." which makes little sense to me, and probably also anybody else involved in the game.
isn't that like, all you did last game? wall post "you did this, this is why that's scummy." rinse and repeat for every player still alive? now I'm legitimately questioning myself bc I thought that was youI never wrote wall posts in noc
also Unvote don't know what the vote count is rn
Check the previous post where I first shared suspicion of Gale for more detailed info on the read. Essentially that he was throwing suspicion on someone acting towny without any basis behind his reads came off very poorly to me. With respect to the post you're quoting I know that one wasn't particularly in depth, I started writing that post in class and went up and did a presentation in the middle of it so my train of thought was lost for the second half of the post lolthree part fun okay. I think dentricos a slip of the mind, in they forgot not everybody has access to scum chat. this casts extra suspicion on the rest of that neighborhood (it's somewhere in the flood but I can't find it) fulfilling the Max One (1) Neighborhood With Multiple Scum, leading into part two.
then the gale/Texas meta. I'm concerned that the majority of the read is "you're acting inconsistent with how you used to play, SCUM!" sort of read it is. iirc it's 80/20 scum/town read which is Ridiculous when dentricos has been floppy just this game and is only 50/50. if the basis had more than just "ur better than this" I'd be less accusatory, but that's? the? whole? read? including "I'm extremely suspicious of his attempts to cast suspicion on my reads and/or character as I would be of anyone who attempts to do so to someone most people had town readparticularly exacerbated in the absence of sound logical reasoning." which makes little sense to me, and probably also anybody else involved in the game.
What those 3 is completely different than what dentricos did also aren't u voting him?Everytime I think of someone who seems to be playing poorly, I think of Sandshrewz, Shubaka, and Whydon in the last noc (no offense to any of you). It's the reason why I'm willing to give Dentricos the benefit of the doubt. They messed up a lot (editing posts, seemingly slipping twice), but there's a part of me that's holding onto the possibility that they're noob town. Still, I'm gonna keep my eye on them, as you can only mess up so many times, and being a noob isn't a good reason to hand wave this kind of thing.
I'd probably see Texas's willingness to lynch me to get information as scummy if it weren't for the fact that I had a similar mindset about lynching Sandshrewz in the last noc. I did genuinely scumread them, but I still thought "If they're town, it'd make it easier for me to find scum." It's how I was able to find Aubisio that night. So I actually see where they're coming from here.
I said "playing poorly" Not "making the exact same mistakes as Dentricos." They all made different mistakes, but they were mistakes nontheless. And yet, all three of the people I named ended up being town. I guess I'm suspicious of the idea that everyone who fucks up somehow is automatically mafia.What those 3 is completely different than what dentricos did also aren't u voting him?
I highly doubt dle approved a noc with neutrals since they kill balance super hardAs the guy who brought Dentricos up (kind of) I just wanted to lay my views out.
I'm not 100% confident he's scum. I'm 90:10 personally. I don't buy the argument he's an easy scum push because that can apply to literally anyone who does suspicious stuff ever. The reason I think he's the best lynch is because day 1 actually worked for once. He slipped up, not once but twice. Like my first callout of his edit, the fact he edited his posts make me believe he edited something out that was also incriminating and this is why edits are disallowed. This on top of my initial scum read makes me confident he's scum; even if he's not, my next read oddish is eh at best, because it's more intuition and less actual scum slips.
As for my views on the situation, twin seemed like he was testing texas with that vote and that was a huge overreaction from him, but I wouldn't confidently call either party scum right now. Nothing else to comment right now, but I want to see your opinions on this Empoof Jalmont
Unrelated note: do you guys think there are neutrals? I strongly believe the neutrals are powerful roles (1 town 1 scum maybe?) or neutrals, but idk if neutrals are common in forum mafia.
Wrt my situation I agree that testing me is a possible outcome - if so, poorly timed considering from my situation it appeared as if he was trying to deflect attention from a teammateAs the guy who brought Dentricos up (kind of) I just wanted to lay my views out.
I'm not 100% confident he's scum. I'm 90:10 personally. I don't buy the argument he's an easy scum push because that can apply to literally anyone who does suspicious stuff ever. The reason I think he's the best lynch is because day 1 actually worked for once. He slipped up, not once but twice. Like my first callout of his edit, the fact he edited his posts make me believe he edited something out that was also incriminating and this is why edits are disallowed. This on top of my initial scum read makes me confident he's scum; even if he's not, my next read oddish is eh at best, because it's more intuition and less actual scum slips.
As for my views on the situation, twin seemed like he was testing texas with that vote and that was a huge overreaction from him, but I wouldn't confidently call either party scum right now. Nothing else to comment right now, but I want to see your opinions on this Empoof Jalmont
Unrelated note: do you guys think there are neutrals? I strongly believe the neutrals are powerful roles (1 town 1 scum maybe?) or neutrals, but idk if neutrals are common in forum mafia.
ok. It's still aids.Also I'm only really kind of confident in the 1st 2 reads of mine last 2 are just random people that I slapped on for now
Why do you want to vote OM Room? Is it another reaction vote?ok. It's still aids.
Unvote, Vote OM Room
pancake Gale Wing Srock Steven Snype shubaka17 Dentricos sheep this wagon while the Dentricos is building.
Off wagon is Texas/Om Room.
If you don't have votes on these 2 wagons be assertive.
agreednot sure wtf empoof is thinking but I'm pretty sure its not good for town