See the Froslass thread for examples of "essays". Whistle and Heysup posted some good ones.
See the Froslass thread for examples of "essays". Whistle and Heysup posted some good ones.
I've been wondering how most people here go about handling Alakazam with balanced / stall teams. I realize hard counters exist, namely Spiritomb and Drapion, but I find everything else risks a 2HKO from either Psychic or a super effective attack.
Any thoughts you guys could share with me?
Okay, since pretty much everyone is saying Cress is broken, what would be the main set that is broken? Sub CM I'm assuming, but what would the two coverage moves be?
I've been wondering how most people here go about handling Alakazam with balanced / stall teams. I realize hard counters exist, namely Spiritomb and Drapion, but I find everything else risks a 2HKO from either Psychic or a super effective attack.
Any thoughts you guys could share with me?
I've been wondering how most people here go about handling Alakazam with balanced / stall teams. I realize hard counters exist, namely Spiritomb and Drapion, but I find everything else risks a 2HKO from either Psychic or a super effective attack.
Any thoughts you guys could share with me?
Scarf Absol works best, from personal experience. You can feign SP and hit sub + 3 attack alakazam if they try to get smart, or pursuit if they run.
I'm sure that Pursuit should OHKO your standard offensive Zam anyway, whether they switch or not. I also don't understand why Spiritomb needs to be a Choice Bander in order to comfortably deal with it.
Anyway, one thing that has bugging me as we approach the end of this testing period is the way that we carry out nominations, in that I don’t believe we are quite doing it right. What I mean is, now that we just immediately vote on the suspects once nominations and voters are registered, a nomination is basically equivalent to a justification for said suspect’s BL status. The problem with this is that currently these nominations are there for everyone to see, and that only such anti-suspect arguments are encouraged during this period, which further skews the perception of the suspect amongst the community and encourages bandwagonning 'plagiarism', and to a lesser extent discourages the pro-suspect crowd (as demonstrated in the last period, although this really shouldn’t happen). Additionally, people who have already posted successful nominations then have to go and write another different ’essay’ saying basically the same thing in order to get the right to vote. I mean talk about awkward; how do you go about writing it?
My proposed solution to this is as follows. Make nominations blind and keep them blind, then the suspects are not announced until the moderators have assessed all the entries at the end of the designated week, and all users are PM'd with feedback. Any successful nominations automatically grant that user the right to vote on the given suspect, leaving them only to write essays for the auto-suspects and any other suspects they didn’t nominate, or are given a ’second chance’ to argue for a failed nomination on a suspect that has nonetheless been successfully nominated by others. Any potential voter who does not feel strongly towards any suspects would be able to use this free time to formulate arguments on the auto-suspects, or otherwise if they are sure a Pokemon is going to get nominated, so the difference in workload from person to person will be minimized overall. I believe this approach will produce a fairer and more streamlined process, but I would like to hear the opinions of other suspect testers here on this as well.
j. franky said:Anyways, my main concern with Cresselia is that I can't stick it on any team. I can't put it on an offensive team, I can't put it on a stall team, but yet its still a pretty good defensive Pokemon. I'm going to have a tough time explaining Cresselia's placing in the tier when the paragraph comes. Anyone else finding it hard to put Cresselia on a team?
Mattman324 said:Now you might think that simply Taunting with Electrode would get the advantage, and I admit, it would. But would Electrode think to Taunt when facing down a Gardevoir lead? How about Solrock? Maybe not.
MOLTRES: No chance.
FROSLASS: Just about as little a chance as Moltres.
Also question for Jabba / Reach: For the auto suspects, eg. Raikou, can we just use last time's paragraph and then add how the current meta changed its status? I don't feel like writing out everything again lol :(
Only use for Shedinja is leading IMO.
Then you don't have to worry about Spinning support or whatever, and it forces some pokes to use a attack(Moltres will use Fire Blast/Overheat/Air Slash for example, not U-Turn), it walls most Ambipom, Shadow Sneaks the hell out of Froslass, and doesn't care about Uxie as long as it doesn't Trick you.
Remembering that you need to stay in until Sheddy is daed, no matter what. Switching Shedinja out means a dead Shedinja, so...
Against RD teams, only Kabutops can really hit a lead Shedinja(unless Ambipom leads uses a Dark attack), and with Focus Sash...
Outside of leading, i see no reason to run Shedinja because it needs too much support.
Only use for Shedinja is leading IMO.
Then you don't have to worry about Spinning support or whatever, and it forces some pokes to use a attack(Moltres will use Fire Blast/Overheat/Air Slash for example, not U-Turn), it walls most Ambipom, Shadow Sneaks the hell out of Froslass, and doesn't care about Uxie as long as it doesn't Trick you.
Remembering that you need to stay in until Sheddy is daed, no matter what. Switching Shedinja out means a dead Shedinja, so...
Against RD teams, only Kabutops can really hit a lead Shedinja(unless Ambipom leads uses a Dark attack), and with Focus Sash...
Outside of leading, i see no reason to run Shedinja because it needs too much support.
Actually, in theory, Shedinja could find a place on a Sunny Day team. It keeps out Sand and Hail while a Jumpluff or Taunt Ambipom lead with SD will largely prevent SR and the monster offense won't give them a turn to do so. It is completely immune to everything most milotic carry (bar toxic, which is why Lum would be > focus sash) and can set up for a late game sweep with SD. Makes a great cleaner when it gets out.
Come to think of it....I gotta test that...
But would Electrode think to Taunt when facing down a Gardevoir lead? How about Solrock? Maybe not.
LolwutMOLTRES: No chance.
Technically correct, as it gets a SE move as well.FROSLASS: Just about as little a chance as Moltres.
You're forgetting NP setsPORYGON Z: Another interesting one. Porygon Z usually uses one of 2 combos: Bolt Beam, or FightDark. You lose to FightDark and win against Boltbeam, plain and simple. So how do you tell? Switch Sheddy in, then switch to a Dark Type absorber. If they switch, they are either choiced (Which can be handled other ways) or they have Boltbeam. If they Dark Pulse, they obviously are FightDark. If they still Tri-Attack, have fun owning with Sheddy, they must be a n00b.
Pretty much the last time I saw one.RAIKOU: When was the last time you saw Shadow ball Raikou? They all run Hidden Power these days.
Shedinja, it seems, has the magical property of being able to sweep with +6 Attack and +2 Speed. Amazing.Point is, if you kill 1 or 2 trouble pokemon, keep SR down, and pass it an Agility, you can just set up SD 3 times and sweep.
It still isn't safe against those teams that do not carry a SR lead, meaning you'd need to carry a spinner anyway (and then we get to the overpreparation topic), added to the fact Lum Berry only saves Shedinja for a single turn, and I see nothing stopping Milotic from just using Toxic again. Finally, the weather leads could just switch into Sheddy and make it faint by the end of the turn, added to the fact Pursuit still exists and is all over the place by now, so I'd only give that a shot when Cresselia is gone and the hype settles down.
Anyway, one thing that has bugging me as we approach the end of this testing period is the way that we carry out nominations, in that I don’t believe we are quite doing it right. What I mean is, now that we just immediately vote on the suspects once nominations and voters are registered, a nomination is basically equivalent to a justification for said suspect’s BL status. The problem with this is that currently these nominations are there for everyone to see, and that only such anti-suspect arguments are encouraged during this period, which further skews the perception of the suspect amongst the community and encourages bandwagonning 'plagiarism', and to a lesser extent discourages the pro-suspect crowd (as demonstrated in the last period, although this really shouldn’t happen). Additionally, people who have already posted successful nominations then have to go and write another different ’essay’ saying basically the same thing in order to get the right to vote. I mean talk about awkward; how do you go about writing it?
My proposed solution to this is as follows. Make nominations blind and keep them blind, then the suspects are not announced until the moderators have assessed all the entries at the end of the designated week, and all users are PM'd with feedback. Any successful nominations automatically grant that user the right to vote on the given suspect, leaving them only to write essays for the auto-suspects and any other suspects they didn’t nominate, or are given a ’second chance’ to argue for a failed nomination on a suspect that has nonetheless been successfully nominated by others. Any potential voter who does not feel strongly towards any suspects would be able to use this free time to formulate arguments on the auto-suspects, or otherwise if they are sure a Pokemon is going to get nominated, so the difference in workload from person to person will be minimized overall. I believe this approach will produce a fairer and more streamlined process, but I would like to hear the opinions of other suspect testers here on this as well.