Vote haruno
Walrein and LightWolf are solid town reads for me at the moment and shouldn't be the day 1 lynch, they had specific townslips in their posts that mafia would have to be highly self-aware of to make.
See what I don't get however is how unnatural the bw on me is, and why you're not focusing on that or more importantly the definite results in cancerous/walrein but yknow I assume you + fort are scum buddies at this point since you're doing all the talking for a newer player but w/e.We are not being fine with or saying who to lynch right now people, we are starting discussions here. AND IF SOMEONE doesn't contribute today they are on the chopping block no questions asked. Yesterday was a good chunk of the game popping in for 1-2 posts after nothing much in the last part of the day, and people ain't getting away with that today. It's why I don't agree with a Blank Slate lynch as there was like 1 meaningful post from him, that's too easy to put blame on.
Lets revive my previous two inquiries now that we actually have time left. Haruno explain the inconsistencies pointed out in your reaction post to your bandwagon and the percieved hypocrisy of how you judged Fort's involvement in the whole thing, including laughing off his reply, which I'd like to see you address.
MoodyCloud Walrein is dead, at best for you he was a neutral, most likely he was a village, and no way he was scum(baring extreme shenanigans). You have gone back on your initial case calling it more of a reaction test, yet we still haven't seen actual evidence of his joking selfdefense you claimed could easily be found by looking at his posts. The one example you finally provided I explained was not at all what you claimed in the actual context. You had also jumped on said Walrein wagon AFTER he was pressured into a defense, and reacted to said defense quite seriously including calling Walrein out on being only reactive. I'd like to hear what you got from his reactions as you never addressed your opinion on Walrein rather unceremoniously dropping that for switching between cancerous and blank slate for the rest of the day. So yeah my case against you is that your Walrein case made no sense and was unjustified and you then later downplayed how seriously you meant it. Prove your Walrein case was justified and that you tell us what you got from the walrein pressure ON walrein, not who voted him for what reason.
Vote Haruno because I feel like this is the one where I need more pressure to get an actual answer.
Is it just me or is this entire post just an OMGUS?
Ok to actually reply to things:
Can I just take this as a shitpost? That wasn't a stunt, it was the blunt truth of my mafia situation to clarify a response to a question asking about past tendencies in mafia.
Unfortunately, no one gives zero shits about ps mafia since it's just a semen infested waters as far as I'm concerned and the winner of that is whoever can control c + v "CLAIMING COP" first wins. And saying on how you don't even bother to look at your role pm to avoid scumslipping among other things such as playing town + mafia the same way is laughable in itself.
That was nowhere near trying to end the conversation. Saying that the burden of proof lies with someone who hadn't given proof yet shows that I think he should bring proof forward. I guess agreeing with someone can be "trying to hop on [their] dick", OR... it can also just be agreeing with someone after reading what they wrote. Heck, even you also stated that at least 1 of the three is almost certainly scum, and that the situation is something that you're "def looking into".
And for the question about bastardization, it was literally just because I wanted to know if we could trust that the DX letters go to a town role. Read however far into it as you wish; I won't accompany you.
You tried to divert attention away from the lw/walrein/moody interaction and instead try to focus it on so called reads and trying to "buddy" up to seem more townish while contributing nothing to the overall conversation is easily seen through. And to top it off, you asked the host a question to supposedly hide your role since you'd want to try and get people to think that roles such as lie detectors or whatnot don't exist in the game when in actuality they do. However due to you making hosts say early on to potentially hide your role is suspicious.
The first line was rather wishy-washy, but I did state a position of believing LW about MoodyCloud.
And nowhere did I say that the lack of votes makes me town nor that people are dumb. I said that I don't care about the scumleans because it's not really giving me pressure (it's day 1, and that [active but semi-fillery]'s the way I play.)
I would think it's better to give my thoughts than to just stfu even when I have something to say.
The first line goes along with what I said in the previous part on how you're trying to buddy up with LW (and shocker out of the three, himself and moody are alive with walrein dead) and a better buddying up since it gets lw to defend you as he's blatantly doing now. W/e about the reads part, again if you didn't feel pressured there was no point saying it or whatnot.
note that that's an unvote from a random lynch way early in the day.
Guess even mafia gods make mistakes. My b.
So "player meta" is a good argument for constantly lynching rssp1 instead of contributing? A single vote with reasons behind it isn't "pushing a bus". There's been plenty of votes around, including the post right above mine detailing why he made lynch on Martin.
And how is "characteristic of someone that doesn't know how I play" a mafia alignment indicator? It seems to me more of an indication that you're trying to use player meta (for a player I'm not familiar with) as an excuse for the way you're acting.
You realize rssp isn't even in the game right?......................................................................................... Guess not.
Of course you'd want to play the player meta because if you play differently than how you normally do then everyone will be on you going random shit like "oh this isn't how x person plays so they're playing scum!!! xd xd xd." Why put myself in that situation when the best way to stay alive as town is to play this way zzzz. Blazade can confirm that's how i played for 101/DN and some other NOC's.
Let's face it most of that entire post was ripping on me because I lynched him. He suddenly stops shitposting and makes a huge-ass analytical post decrying the first person of a chain to lynch him, completely ignoring cancerous, the BT + Texas interaction (except for a line saying LOOOOL), people hopping on the wagon, Texas's other posts on page 7, smashlloyd, and probably more.
I was making the post regardless, but since you're scum, why would I not focus on you? Again the fact that so many people immediately jumped on the bw immediately afterwards just shows how despite having no player knowledge on me, you knew you could get people to easily jump on a haruno bus and we see that again this cycle! If anything, the votes reveal more of what's happening than anything.
~~~
Let's try to transition from his posts about me and look at some other things in that post while we're here.
~~~
One thing Haruno did get right was:which echoes walrein's comment saying much the same.
how is that "'hosts say i can't quit' so suddenly i have motivation! YIPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in any way? No matter how I look at it, it looks like him reluctantly trying to keep the game going and not ruining it because of his lack of motivation. And lol @ calling us scumbuddies because he lynches you as well. Then what about Texas and Blazade?
Because if hosts say "oh you can't quit because we need u" doesn't make someone go from idgaf/sub me out of this farce to wanting to play again. Simple as that. I'll be getting on texas soon though because his actions thus far have all been unnatural with leading the cancerous lynch, trying to bus me, etc.
And finally, Haruno didn't go into particulars about BT's post except saying that it's interesting and more useful later.
His post is more useful later on after flips since it's something that can easily be traced back to him later on but not at that point in time.
/sleep
Are you trying to claim that cancerous isn't a village and that the flip is faked and that he's really part of some wolf faction? I can semi believe magma veil, in addition to how multiple fucking users must've requested mason for this to come up. You'll need a realllllllllllllllllllllllly solid defense to defend your plays since the cancerous lynch points to you, and the public announce? inspect? says you're a town when by all means you could be scum so er what.Me as you well know
My working theory was that cancerous was a wolf when he didn't flip on lynch but this delayed flip is throwing me right off. Certain night things have left more questions than answers so for the time being I'm sitting back and thinking.
On a separate note one of the things I as thinking about in a cancerous wolf situation was that standard convention is 3 town for every mafia up to two town per mafia so with 21 players there's a decent chance we're looking at 5 scum and a wolf as set up. Whether that's accurate or not isn't important, what's important is that we have a guideline for mylo/lylo
1: I made my post, the one you just tried to respond to, 6 minutes BEFORE he poked at more or less the same holes in your post.See what I don't get however is how unnatural the bw on me is, and why you're not focusing on that or more importantly the definite results in cancerous/walrein but yknow I assume you + fort are scum buddies at this point since you're doing all the talking for a newer player but w/e.
Simply put his gameplay and his response was laughable and thus not worth responding to, though if you got so much clarification from him, I assume you'd mind enlightening me or focusing on said issues that I raised in how cancerous lynch is unnatural, why is walrein dead and why are so many people jumping on my bw so easily since I presume there's at least a mafia or two on it since I'm an easy myslynch in pretty much noc.
1: No response to the omgus idea.Is it just me or is this entire post just an OMGUS?
Ok to actually reply to things:
Can I just take this as a shitpost? That wasn't a stunt, it was the blunt truth of my mafia situation to clarify a response to a question asking about past tendencies in mafia.
Unfortunately, no one gives zero shits about ps mafia since it's just a semen infested waters as far as I'm concerned and the winner of that is whoever can control c + v "CLAIMING COP" first wins. And saying on how you don't even bother to look at your role pm to avoid scumslipping among other things such as playing town + mafia the same way is laughable in itself.
1: You're just repeating what you said before I rebutted you. Is there a point to circular argumentation?That was nowhere near trying to end the conversation. Saying that the burden of proof lies with someone who hadn't given proof yet shows that I think he should bring proof forward. I guess agreeing with someone can be "trying to hop on [their] dick", OR... it can also just be agreeing with someone after reading what they wrote. Heck, even you also stated that at least 1 of the three is almost certainly scum, and that the situation is something that you're "def looking into".
And for the question about bastardization, it was literally just because I wanted to know if we could trust that the DX letters go to a town role. Read however far into it as you wish; I won't accompany you.
You tried to divert attention away from the lw/walrein/moody interaction and instead try to focus it on so called reads and trying to "buddy" up to seem more townish while contributing nothing to the overall conversation is easily seen through. And to top it off, you asked the host a question to supposedly hide your role since you'd want to try and get people to think that roles such as lie detectors or whatnot don't exist in the game when in actuality they do. However due to you making hosts say early on to potentially hide your role is suspicious.
1: I voted to lynch moody.The first line was rather wishy-washy, but I did state a position of believing LW about MoodyCloud.
And nowhere did I say that the lack of votes makes me town nor that people are dumb. I said that I don't care about the scumleans because it's not really giving me pressure (it's day 1, and that [active but semi-fillery]'s the way I play.)
I would think it's better to give my thoughts than to just stfu even when I have something to say.
The first line goes along with what I said in the previous part on how you're trying to buddy up with LW (and shocker out of the three, himself and moody are alive with walrein dead) and a better buddying up since it gets lw to defend you as he's blatantly doing now. W/e about the reads part, again if you didn't feel pressured there was no point saying it or whatnot.
Not much to say here.note that that's an unvote from a random lynch way early in the day.
Guess even mafia gods make mistakes. My b.
1: Did you see this post? I quoted it in case you didn't.So "player meta" is a good argument for constantly lynching rssp1 instead of contributing? A single vote with reasons behind it isn't "pushing a bus". There's been plenty of votes around, including the post right above mine detailing why he made lynch on Martin.
And how is "characteristic of someone that doesn't know how I play" a mafia alignment indicator? It seems to me more of an indication that you're trying to use player meta (for a player I'm not familiar with) as an excuse for the way you're acting.
You realize rssp isn't even in the game right?......................................................................................... Guess not.
Of course you'd want to play the player meta because if you play differently than how you normally do then everyone will be on you going random shit like "oh this isn't how x person plays so they're playing scum!!! xd xd xd." Why put myself in that situation when the best way to stay alive as town is to play this way zzzz. Blazade can confirm that's how i played for 101/DN and some other NOC's.
It's not helpful to be lynching a player not in the game.I can answer for haruno: rssp1 isn't in the game lol
but he's always scum so it's ok
1: Did you have a preconceived notion of me being scum? And/or you know I'm town and wanna pass me off as scum?Let's face it most of that entire post was ripping on me because I lynched him. He suddenly stops shitposting and makes a huge-ass analytical post decrying the first person of a chain to lynch him, completely ignoring cancerous, the BT + Texas interaction (except for a line saying LOOOOL), people hopping on the wagon, Texas's other posts on page 7, smashlloyd, and probably more.
I was making the post regardless, but since you're scum, why would I not focus on you? Again the fact that so many people immediately jumped on the bw immediately afterwards just shows how despite having no player knowledge on me, you knew you could get people to easily jump on a haruno bus and we see that again this cycle! If anything, the votes reveal more of what's happening than anything.
We agree on aubisio, so nothing to say there.~~~
Let's try to transition from his posts about me and look at some other things in that post while we're here.
~~~
One thing Haruno did get right was:which echoes walrein's comment saying much the same.
how is that "'hosts say i can't quit' so suddenly i have motivation! YIPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in any way? No matter how I look at it, it looks like him reluctantly trying to keep the game going and not ruining it because of his lack of motivation. And lol @ calling us scumbuddies because he lynches you as well. Then what about Texas and Blazade?
Because if hosts say "oh you can't quit because we need u" doesn't make someone go from idgaf/sub me out of this farce to wanting to play again. Simple as that. I'll be getting on texas soon though because his actions thus far have all been unnatural with leading the cancerous lynch, trying to bus me, etc.
I just mentioned that in order to be thorough. It was just saying "nothing to analyze here".And finally, Haruno didn't go into particulars about BT's post except saying that it's interesting and more useful later.
His post is more useful later on after flips since it's something that can easily be traced back to him later on but not at that point in time.
/sleep
{5+1=6}:21 is a bit less than 1:3, which would be {7}:21, and 1:2 would be even less than that. Js.Me as you well know
My working theory was that cancerous was a wolf when he didn't flip on lynch but this delayed flip is throwing me right off. Certain night things have left more questions than answers so for the time being I'm sitting back and thinking.
On a separate note one of the things I as thinking about in a cancerous wolf situation was that standard convention is 3 town for every mafia up to two town per mafia so with 21 players there's a decent chance we're looking at 5 scum and a wolf as set up. Whether that's accurate or not isn't important, what's important is that we have a guideline for mylo/lylo
No I'm not. I said my working theory was. As in during the night phase.Are you trying to claim that cancerous isn't a village and that the flip is faked and that he's really part of some wolf faction? I can semi believe magma veil, in addition to how multiple fucking users must've requested mason for this to come up. You'll need a realllllllllllllllllllllllly solid defense to defend your plays since the cancerous lynch points to you, and the public announce? inspect? says you're a town when by all means you could be scum so er what.
Question, why were you so insistent on a cancerous lynch yesterday? There were other cases out there, but you turned a blind eye to all of them and told everyone on haruno to specifically move to cancerous and not anyone else.
{5+1=6}:21 is a bit less than 1:3, which would be {7}:21, and 1:2 would be even less than that. Js.
What concerns me is how you're all letting texas even lead in the first place when him leading always led to disastrous results in pretty much every mafia to date. And at the moment he seems to be heading there. I find it interesting how texas publicly announced/inspected himself as village in an attempt to hide the fact he's mafia.
What's even more concerning is how no one ever cares for results LOL.
I would love to lead a lynch but my faction cop failed last night.What concerns me is how you're all letting texas even lead in the first place when him leading always led to disastrous results in pretty much every mafia to date. And at the moment he seems to be heading there. I find it interesting how texas publicly announced/inspected himself as village in an attempt to hide the fact he's mafia.
What's even more concerning is how no one ever cares for results LOL.