• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC OC NOC GAME OVER - Now Despair

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, I'm gonna start with the tangent of Town!Walrein, which is primarily based on the logic of who would want both Cancer and Walrein dead, thus looking to the wagons for tells. The overlap on the two wagons is Moody and Texas.

Texas pushed players into a final hours wagon which doesn't hold up under Cancer's flip. He also jumped on Walrein's wagon without explanation. I'm taking that "Texas = town" blurb with a grain of salt since it's potential WiFoM.

Moody basically shrugged his way onto the swingvote of Cancer's wagon and was similarly noncommittal in trying to get Walrein lynched. Add to that the previous observation I made about blatantly ignoring a Towntell.

-----
The other tangent is scum!Walrein, which presumes Veteran due to lack of scum NK (against Vetclaims atm for same reason as Mason) and uses the reread to follow buddying tells. The defenses I noticed were from Light, myself, and Butter.

My previous read of Light clashes with this tangent. I noticed in my reread that Light attacked a player for voting Walrein. However, that's further muddled by the fact that the attacked player is one of my scumreads. Mixed signals here. Gut still wants to read Light as Town, but brain says further examination will depend on Walrein's flip.

I'm gonna go take a closer look at Butter since he was in my null pile.

-----
Either way, I'm hesitant to make a vote without a flip to go by. The lack of info makes it too easy to screw up and mislynch, imo. But if I had to gut up and place a vote despite the fuckery, it'd probably be on Moody.
 
Okay, no, there is a major dissonance with Texas on Walrein's wagon. Page 5 he votes Walrein and then fixes his vote to make it valid. His next post is on Page 6, where he lists Walrein as a Townread.

Walrein and LightWolf are solid town reads for me at the moment and shouldn't be the day 1 lynch, they had specific townslips in their posts that mafia would have to be highly self-aware of to make.

Vote: Texas Cloverleaf
 
There is too much fucking noise and nonsense that has happened to end day 1 that I don't even know where to begin to comprehend any and all of it. The entirety of all those last minute lynch wagons was sewage but there are so many damned people involved I don't know where to start.
 
sorry for missing EoD1, i ended up being out of data+wifi for most of wednesday and thursday. the cancerous shift seems icky, since he should've had mason partners? and also the Haruno/BS wagons seemed more stable?

lynch haruno idk how you got out of the lynch yesterday but i'd like to see you try it again?
 
We are not being fine with or saying who to lynch right now people, we are starting discussions here. AND IF SOMEONE doesn't contribute today they are on the chopping block no questions asked. Yesterday was a good chunk of the game popping in for 1-2 posts after nothing much in the last part of the day, and people ain't getting away with that today. It's why I don't agree with a Blank Slate lynch as there was like 1 meaningful post from him, that's too easy to put blame on.

Lets revive my previous two inquiries now that we actually have time left. Haruno explain the inconsistencies pointed out in your reaction post to your bandwagon and the percieved hypocrisy of how you judged Fort's involvement in the whole thing, including laughing off his reply, which I'd like to see you address.

MoodyCloud Walrein is dead, at best for you he was a neutral, most likely he was a village, and no way he was scum(baring extreme shenanigans). You have gone back on your initial case calling it more of a reaction test, yet we still haven't seen actual evidence of his joking selfdefense you claimed could easily be found by looking at his posts. The one example you finally provided I explained was not at all what you claimed in the actual context. You had also jumped on said Walrein wagon AFTER he was pressured into a defense, and reacted to said defense quite seriously including calling Walrein out on being only reactive. I'd like to hear what you got from his reactions as you never addressed your opinion on Walrein rather unceremoniously dropping that for switching between cancerous and blank slate for the rest of the day. So yeah my case against you is that your Walrein case made no sense and was unjustified and you then later downplayed how seriously you meant it. Prove your Walrein case was justified and that you tell us what you got from the walrein pressure ON walrein, not who voted him for what reason.
Vote Haruno because I feel like this is the one where I need more pressure to get an actual answer.
See what I don't get however is how unnatural the bw on me is, and why you're not focusing on that or more importantly the definite results in cancerous/walrein but yknow I assume you + fort are scum buddies at this point since you're doing all the talking for a newer player but w/e.

Simply put his gameplay and his response was laughable and thus not worth responding to, though if you got so much clarification from him, I assume you'd mind enlightening me or focusing on said issues that I raised in how cancerous lynch is unnatural, why is walrein dead and why are so many people jumping on my bw so easily since I presume there's at least a mafia or two on it since I'm an easy myslynch in pretty much noc.
 
Is it just me or is this entire post just an OMGUS?

Ok to actually reply to things:


Can I just take this as a shitpost? That wasn't a stunt, it was the blunt truth of my mafia situation to clarify a response to a question asking about past tendencies in mafia.

Unfortunately, no one gives zero shits about ps mafia since it's just a semen infested waters as far as I'm concerned and the winner of that is whoever can control c + v "CLAIMING COP" first wins. And saying on how you don't even bother to look at your role pm to avoid scumslipping among other things such as playing town + mafia the same way is laughable in itself.

That was nowhere near trying to end the conversation. Saying that the burden of proof lies with someone who hadn't given proof yet shows that I think he should bring proof forward. I guess agreeing with someone can be "trying to hop on [their] dick", OR... it can also just be agreeing with someone after reading what they wrote. Heck, even you also stated that at least 1 of the three is almost certainly scum, and that the situation is something that you're "def looking into".
And for the question about bastardization, it was literally just because I wanted to know if we could trust that the DX letters go to a town role. Read however far into it as you wish; I won't accompany you.

You tried to divert attention away from the lw/walrein/moody interaction and instead try to focus it on so called reads and trying to "buddy" up to seem more townish while contributing nothing to the overall conversation is easily seen through. And to top it off, you asked the host a question to supposedly hide your role since you'd want to try and get people to think that roles such as lie detectors or whatnot don't exist in the game when in actuality they do. However due to you making hosts say early on to potentially hide your role is suspicious.

The first line was rather wishy-washy, but I did state a position of believing LW about MoodyCloud.
And nowhere did I say that the lack of votes makes me town nor that people are dumb. I said that I don't care about the scumleans because it's not really giving me pressure (it's day 1, and that [active but semi-fillery]'s the way I play.)
I would think it's better to give my thoughts than to just stfu even when I have something to say.

The first line goes along with what I said in the previous part on how you're trying to buddy up with LW (and shocker out of the three, himself and moody are alive with walrein dead) and a better buddying up since it gets lw to defend you as he's blatantly doing now. W/e about the reads part, again if you didn't feel pressured there was no point saying it or whatnot.

note that that's an unvote from a random lynch way early in the day.

Guess even mafia gods make mistakes. My b.

So "player meta" is a good argument for constantly lynching rssp1 instead of contributing? A single vote with reasons behind it isn't "pushing a bus". There's been plenty of votes around, including the post right above mine detailing why he made lynch on Martin.
And how is "characteristic of someone that doesn't know how I play" a mafia alignment indicator? It seems to me more of an indication that you're trying to use player meta (for a player I'm not familiar with) as an excuse for the way you're acting.

You realize rssp isn't even in the game right?......................................................................................... Guess not.
Of course you'd want to play the player meta because if you play differently than how you normally do then everyone will be on you going random shit like "oh this isn't how x person plays so they're playing scum!!! xd xd xd." Why put myself in that situation when the best way to stay alive as town is to play this way zzzz. Blazade can confirm that's how i played for 101/DN and some other NOC's.


Let's face it most of that entire post was ripping on me because I lynched him. He suddenly stops shitposting and makes a huge-ass analytical post decrying the first person of a chain to lynch him, completely ignoring cancerous, the BT + Texas interaction (except for a line saying LOOOOL), people hopping on the wagon, Texas's other posts on page 7, smashlloyd, and probably more.

I was making the post regardless, but since you're scum, why would I not focus on you? Again the fact that so many people immediately jumped on the bw immediately afterwards just shows how despite having no player knowledge on me, you knew you could get people to easily jump on a haruno bus and we see that again this cycle! If anything, the votes reveal more of what's happening than anything.

~~~
Let's try to transition from his posts about me and look at some other things in that post while we're here.
~~~

One thing Haruno did get right was:which echoes walrein's comment saying much the same.


how is that "'hosts say i can't quit' so suddenly i have motivation! YIPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in any way? No matter how I look at it, it looks like him reluctantly trying to keep the game going and not ruining it because of his lack of motivation. And lol @ calling us scumbuddies because he lynches you as well. Then what about Texas and Blazade?

Because if hosts say "oh you can't quit because we need u" doesn't make someone go from idgaf/sub me out of this farce to wanting to play again. Simple as that. I'll be getting on texas soon though because his actions thus far have all been unnatural with leading the cancerous lynch, trying to bus me, etc.

And finally, Haruno didn't go into particulars about BT's post except saying that it's interesting and more useful later.

His post is more useful later on after flips since it's something that can easily be traced back to him later on but not at that point in time.

/sleep
 
Well that was a fucking waste of time, that post was still as bad as I remembered it. Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo LightWolf you better start posting some thoughts on the whole cancerous/walrein situation in addition to your overall thoughts on texas' play as a whole.
 
This flip thing is messy.
Ok, the letter was aimed at the four people who were nearly quad lynched, and also to the one who pushed the Cancerous lynch. Indicative that one of the 3 unlynched (including me i guess) is scum. That's what I think.
Wait, who pushed Cancerous lynch?
 
Me as you well know

My working theory was that cancerous was a wolf when he didn't flip on lynch but this delayed flip is throwing me right off. Certain night things have left more questions than answers so for the time being I'm sitting back and thinking.

On a separate note one of the things I as thinking about in a cancerous wolf situation was that standard convention is 3 town for every mafia up to two town per mafia so with 21 players there's a decent chance we're looking at 5 scum and a wolf as set up. Whether that's accurate or not isn't important, what's important is that we have a guideline for mylo/lylo
 
Me as you well know

My working theory was that cancerous was a wolf when he didn't flip on lynch but this delayed flip is throwing me right off. Certain night things have left more questions than answers so for the time being I'm sitting back and thinking.

On a separate note one of the things I as thinking about in a cancerous wolf situation was that standard convention is 3 town for every mafia up to two town per mafia so with 21 players there's a decent chance we're looking at 5 scum and a wolf as set up. Whether that's accurate or not isn't important, what's important is that we have a guideline for mylo/lylo
Are you trying to claim that cancerous isn't a village and that the flip is faked and that he's really part of some wolf faction? I can semi believe magma veil, in addition to how multiple fucking users must've requested mason for this to come up. You'll need a realllllllllllllllllllllllly solid defense to defend your plays since the cancerous lynch points to you, and the public announce? inspect? says you're a town when by all means you could be scum so er what.
 
See what I don't get however is how unnatural the bw on me is, and why you're not focusing on that or more importantly the definite results in cancerous/walrein but yknow I assume you + fort are scum buddies at this point since you're doing all the talking for a newer player but w/e.

Simply put his gameplay and his response was laughable and thus not worth responding to, though if you got so much clarification from him, I assume you'd mind enlightening me or focusing on said issues that I raised in how cancerous lynch is unnatural, why is walrein dead and why are so many people jumping on my bw so easily since I presume there's at least a mafia or two on it since I'm an easy myslynch in pretty much noc.
1: I made my post, the one you just tried to respond to, 6 minutes BEFORE he poked at more or less the same holes in your post.
And for day 2, I just got online now.
2: I also raised questions about the cancerous wagon yesterday. Walrein even quoted my post to "file it away" or whatever.

Is it just me or is this entire post just an OMGUS?
Ok to actually reply to things:
Can I just take this as a shitpost? That wasn't a stunt, it was the blunt truth of my mafia situation to clarify a response to a question asking about past tendencies in mafia.

Unfortunately, no one gives zero shits about ps mafia since it's just a semen infested waters as far as I'm concerned and the winner of that is whoever can control c + v "CLAIMING COP" first wins. And saying on how you don't even bother to look at your role pm to avoid scumslipping among other things such as playing town + mafia the same way is laughable in itself.
1: No response to the omgus idea.
2: What happened to the "you aren't me you can't pull this kind of stunt" thing? Did you realize that that wouldn't fly so you changed your tune?
3: That was an event that occurred accidentally. I didn't do it "to avoid scumslipping". I've already said this happened 9+ months ago, and playstyles and mentalities can change in 9 months. Especially in 9 months of not seriously playing. Hence why I said "There's no recent, and therefore revelant, data."
4: Since I haven't played on smogon mafia before, and I was answering a question about my past tendencies in mafia, other people actually do seem to care what I did on ps mafia, even if you don't. Not everything I've said this game is directed towards you, especially before you made that huge omgus post.

That was nowhere near trying to end the conversation. Saying that the burden of proof lies with someone who hadn't given proof yet shows that I think he should bring proof forward. I guess agreeing with someone can be "trying to hop on [their] dick", OR... it can also just be agreeing with someone after reading what they wrote. Heck, even you also stated that at least 1 of the three is almost certainly scum, and that the situation is something that you're "def looking into".
And for the question about bastardization, it was literally just because I wanted to know if we could trust that the DX letters go to a town role. Read however far into it as you wish; I won't accompany you.

You tried to divert attention away from the lw/walrein/moody interaction and instead try to focus it on so called reads and trying to "buddy" up to seem more townish while contributing nothing to the overall conversation is easily seen through. And to top it off, you asked the host a question to supposedly hide your role since you'd want to try and get people to think that roles such as lie detectors or whatnot don't exist in the game when in actuality they do. However due to you making hosts say early on to potentially hide your role is suspicious.
1: You're just repeating what you said before I rebutted you. Is there a point to circular argumentation?
2: What reasonable interpretation makes it seem like I tried to divert attention from the subject? I pointed out that moodycloud had the burden of proof, and that moodycloud could easily find posts to use as evidence with the search feature. That sounds like adding helpful information to the subject, not diverting attention away.
3: I wanted to send a letter that was basically a claim. That's why I needed to know if I could trust that the letter went to town.
4: Why is "hiding my role" the only possible reason for asking if a game is non-bastard? Please, that narrow-minded idea is flat-out wrong. In fact, I even went on to clarify that I was asking in terms of hosts lying to us, and the answer I got was "we are honest people", which is exactly what I was looking for.

The first line was rather wishy-washy, but I did state a position of believing LW about MoodyCloud.
And nowhere did I say that the lack of votes makes me town nor that people are dumb. I said that I don't care about the scumleans because it's not really giving me pressure (it's day 1, and that [active but semi-fillery]'s the way I play.)
I would think it's better to give my thoughts than to just stfu even when I have something to say.

The first line goes along with what I said in the previous part on how you're trying to buddy up with LW (and shocker out of the three, himself and moody are alive with walrein dead) and a better buddying up since it gets lw to defend you as he's blatantly doing now. W/e about the reads part, again if you didn't feel pressured there was no point saying it or whatnot.
1: I voted to lynch moody.
2: LW was questioning moody's attack on lightwolf. I agreed with him because his words made sense, and even added something new to the conversation (see next block).
3: And "The first line goes along with what I said in the previous part on how you're trying to buddy up with LW" is not what you said last time. In the post I rebutted, you made it sound like I took no position in the LW/moody/walrein interaction.
4: Again, I think it's better to post than to not post.

note that that's an unvote from a random lynch way early in the day.

Guess even mafia gods make mistakes. My b.
Not much to say here.

So "player meta" is a good argument for constantly lynching rssp1 instead of contributing? A single vote with reasons behind it isn't "pushing a bus". There's been plenty of votes around, including the post right above mine detailing why he made lynch on Martin.
And how is "characteristic of someone that doesn't know how I play" a mafia alignment indicator? It seems to me more of an indication that you're trying to use player meta (for a player I'm not familiar with) as an excuse for the way you're acting.

You realize rssp isn't even in the game right?......................................................................................... Guess not.
Of course you'd want to play the player meta because if you play differently than how you normally do then everyone will be on you going random shit like "oh this isn't how x person plays so they're playing scum!!! xd xd xd." Why put myself in that situation when the best way to stay alive as town is to play this way zzzz. Blazade can confirm that's how i played for 101/DN and some other NOC's.
1: Did you see this post? I quoted it in case you didn't.
I can answer for haruno: rssp1 isn't in the game lol
but he's always scum so it's ok
It's not helpful to be lynching a player not in the game.
2: I like how you ignore my statement that I'm not pushing a bus. Texas's cancer thing was pushing a bus; he made it clear that he wanted a wagon on cancerous. He even posted with nothing but "Get your votes off haruno and onto cancerous" once.
3: Look, I can accept that it's player meta for you to be pretending to be playing shit. But that doesn't mean I'm not going to call you out on it. Lynching rssp1 and answering RQS gives basically nothing for us to read you. If you're acting in a way that I see as scummy, I'm going to call it scummy.
4: You also completely ignored my question of "And how is "characteristic of someone that doesn't know how I play" a mafia alignment indicator?"

Let's face it most of that entire post was ripping on me because I lynched him. He suddenly stops shitposting and makes a huge-ass analytical post decrying the first person of a chain to lynch him, completely ignoring cancerous, the BT + Texas interaction (except for a line saying LOOOOL), people hopping on the wagon, Texas's other posts on page 7, smashlloyd, and probably more.

I was making the post regardless, but since you're scum, why would I not focus on you? Again the fact that so many people immediately jumped on the bw immediately afterwards just shows how despite having no player knowledge on me, you knew you could get people to easily jump on a haruno bus and we see that again this cycle! If anything, the votes reveal more of what's happening than anything.
1: Did you have a preconceived notion of me being scum? And/or you know I'm town and wanna pass me off as scum?
2: The only other person you quoted was Knights in order to say "Never ask such a stupid percentage based question again LOL since it isn't NAI for any user as far as I'm concerned." There were other interesting comments in your post, which did not quote the person being replied to for.
3: "I knew I could get people to easily jump on a haruno bus" ...I was not, actually, aware of anything of the sort. I have no idea why the bandwagon on you shows that I knew it would happen easily.
4: HOWEVER, it was blatantly clear that a haruno lynch wouldn't be hard because your actions in this game and this game alone are lynchworthy. If you put down the player meta defense, you're either a completely nonhelpful townie or a scum. It's hard to tell, because you have posted almost no content except calling me scum.
5: Yes, the votes reveal a lot about what's happening. What's happening is, you're fucking scummy.
6: You casually dismiss the idea that your scumread on me is an OMGUS. Perhaps the OMGUS is where your "preconceived idea of me being scum" that I asked about in 1 came from.

~~~
Let's try to transition from his posts about me and look at some other things in that post while we're here.
~~~
One thing Haruno did get right was:which echoes walrein's comment saying much the same.


how is that "'hosts say i can't quit' so suddenly i have motivation! YIPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in any way? No matter how I look at it, it looks like him reluctantly trying to keep the game going and not ruining it because of his lack of motivation. And lol @ calling us scumbuddies because he lynches you as well. Then what about Texas and Blazade?

Because if hosts say "oh you can't quit because we need u" doesn't make someone go from idgaf/sub me out of this farce to wanting to play again. Simple as that. I'll be getting on texas soon though because his actions thus far have all been unnatural with leading the cancerous lynch, trying to bus me, etc.
We agree on aubisio, so nothing to say there.
We can agree to disagree here: I see martin as reluctantly continuing to play, you see him as having a shift in motivation. However, I made my view ont he subject very clear, and you just blindly repeated what you said last time. This rings of "yes he did" "no he didn't" argumentation.

And finally, Haruno didn't go into particulars about BT's post except saying that it's interesting and more useful later.

His post is more useful later on after flips since it's something that can easily be traced back to him later on but not at that point in time.

/sleep
I just mentioned that in order to be thorough. It was just saying "nothing to analyze here".

~~~

Haruno did a lot of insulting in the last post. It's nice to see that go away here.
I would lynch haruno, but I'd like for the texas questioning and moodycloud questioning to go on, so I'll wait a few days.

~~~

I still think moodycloud is scummy; he was on walrein for vague accusations early on, and continued to use vague idea to stay on walrein.

Me as you well know

My working theory was that cancerous was a wolf when he didn't flip on lynch but this delayed flip is throwing me right off. Certain night things have left more questions than answers so for the time being I'm sitting back and thinking.

On a separate note one of the things I as thinking about in a cancerous wolf situation was that standard convention is 3 town for every mafia up to two town per mafia so with 21 players there's a decent chance we're looking at 5 scum and a wolf as set up. Whether that's accurate or not isn't important, what's important is that we have a guideline for mylo/lylo
{5+1=6}:21 is a bit less than 1:3, which would be {7}:21, and 1:2 would be even less than that. Js.
Question, why were you so insistent on a cancerous lynch yesterday? There were other cases out there, but you turned a blind eye to all of them and told everyone on haruno to specifically move to cancerous and not anyone else.
 
Are you trying to claim that cancerous isn't a village and that the flip is faked and that he's really part of some wolf faction? I can semi believe magma veil, in addition to how multiple fucking users must've requested mason for this to come up. You'll need a realllllllllllllllllllllllly solid defense to defend your plays since the cancerous lynch points to you, and the public announce? inspect? says you're a town when by all means you could be scum so er what.
No I'm not. I said my working theory was. As in during the night phase.
 
Question, why were you so insistent on a cancerous lynch yesterday? There were other cases out there, but you turned a blind eye to all of them and told everyone on haruno to specifically move to cancerous and not anyone else.

I think my rationale is very apparent in my posts if you look back at them. I didn't believe that the wagons being presented were scum (in the case of Walrein) or I believed that while the users in question hadn't given us any reason not to lynch them (in the case of Haruno and MoodyCloud) they were acting identically to what I've seen is their town meta.

In contrast, I had gone through the thread and done my analysis, looking for specific scummy behaviours and Cancerous's posts were the ones that stood out to me as attempting to push a lynch on someone who I believed had town slipped (confirmation dependent on Walrein flip) with poor reasoning while avoiding putting down any substance that he could be held accountable to via avoiding RQS and simultaneously demeaning RVS.

In short, my logic led me to believe that Cancerous was definitively the best lynch and that we would not find scum on the other wagons.
 
What concerns me is how you're all letting texas even lead in the first place when him leading always led to disastrous results in pretty much every mafia to date. And at the moment he seems to be heading there. I find it interesting how texas publicly announced/inspected himself as village in an attempt to hide the fact he's mafia.

What's even more concerning is how no one ever cares for results LOL.
 
What concerns me is how you're all letting texas even lead in the first place when him leading always led to disastrous results in pretty much every mafia to date. And at the moment he seems to be heading there. I find it interesting how texas publicly announced/inspected himself as village in an attempt to hide the fact he's mafia.

What's even more concerning is how no one ever cares for results LOL.

Are you going to laugh off my post again? Come to think of it, you never explained why you laughed off my first post yesterday either.
 
What concerns me is how you're all letting texas even lead in the first place when him leading always led to disastrous results in pretty much every mafia to date. And at the moment he seems to be heading there. I find it interesting how texas publicly announced/inspected himself as village in an attempt to hide the fact he's mafia.

What's even more concerning is how no one ever cares for results LOL.
I would love to lead a lynch but my faction cop failed last night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top