Stacking the odds in your favor is a legitimate strategy which is why evasion and OHKO moves are on the testing list. The only good reason to ban them is if they're overpowered (which I actually suspect that they might be).
This point that you bring up is kind of interesting as it can also be applied to both Deoxys-S and Garchomp. You could say that both of them were just extremely good at what they did and "rose to the top" because of it. In turn you could say that Stealth Rock is also extremly good at what it does and is quite comparable to both Deoxys-S and Garchomp and a lot of the arguments used for the banning of these two Pokemon are currently being used to try to justify the banning of Stealth Rock now, yet quite a few people say there is no justifiable reason to ban Stealth Rock.since there are virutally infinite tactics that you can use in pokemon, obviously some will rise to the top.
The idea that "we need to ban stealth rock because its a really good move that a lot of people use" is fundamentally flawed and just demonstrates a lack of understanding of competitive games.
Sounds like Shaymin-S in a nutshell.Which is exactly why they are still banned. Anything that relies too much on RNG's is drawing from an overabundance of luck, thus reducing the effectiveness of strategic pokemon battling in general.
Lol if we have to ban everything luck based we still have a long way to go.Evasion isn't banned because it's "annoying", it's banned because it emphasizes luck over skill and decreases the quality of the metagame.
Except Magikarp.Every OU (and most BL and UU Pokemon) dominate a section of the game, because Pokemon are specialized. Nothing fills the Rapid-Spinner with Recovery roll quite like Starmie. Abomasnow is the best hail starter; it completely outclasses Pokemon using Hail. You really can't beat Blissey for general special walling.
Rather than something being "too good," or "luck based," or "extreme," I think you can be more accurate (though less specific) by saying that "It's banned because it makes for a worse game." That problably means "a less competitive game." Unfortunately this is not something that can be defined, as even if we talk about centralization (which by the way is also hard to define as to how much is too much), "uncentralized" =/= "better"/"more competitive" necessarily.As I understand it, the main criteria for a ban are all specific to each effect that we're going for. For example, Double Team and Sheer Cold are banned because they rely solely on luck. This is unlike Sand Veil, where luck helps, but it is not the only factor to success. I have always thought that Uber Tier pokemon were deemed Uber because they are "too good" for standard play and that tier is to function as a trash bin of sorts. Yet other extreme things are banned because they take away from competitive play, such as Wobbuffet. All 3 of these categories must first be assigned, and each have their own uniquely subjective arguments.
It's pretty clear to me that Stealth Rock is not luck based or "too good" in any way, so its only remaining category with which to debate it in would be to say that it does or does not damage competitive play. Even if it does damage competitive play, we have to assign an arbitrary degree of damage and decide if it passes that tolerance level or not, such as Wobbuffet did.
While I think this particular thread focus is ill prepared for such an undertaking, the concept is a good one. I think the Smogon community would benefit greatly if the Policy Review Board were to formulate its own community specific criteria or criterion with which to use as a guideline for further regulation of the rules that make the competitive standard format.
Again, this is just from my observations. I would fully understand if that kind of debacle would encourage excessive use of theorymon, and I still think that the current voting method is a great idea.
I think we should consider the risk/reward ratio of SR to.It's pretty clear to me that Stealth Rock is not luck based or "too good" in any way, so its only remaining category with which to debate it in would be to say that it does or does not damage competitive play. Even if it does damage competitive play, we have to assign an arbitrary degree of damage and decide if it passes that tolerance level or not, such as Wobbuffet did.
1. Going by your logic, Wobbuffet's not uber either.Its my opinion that garchomp simply is not a uber;it breaks the mold of ubers. for one thing, its a evolved form and another, its seen in hands of trainers ingame and you can go on. I think if you compare its "mechanics of existence" for lack of better phrase, it shares little in common with ubers. Deoxys-e is an uber regardless if its stats are 20 and it only has splash-its STILL an uber.
My .02$
I think it's almost an impossible argument really. "Why not ban suicide leads then?"Mia said:I think a much better argument would be to say that it hurts standard play by necessitating a suicide lead coupled with Rotom on every team, effectively removing 1/3rd of the team from the start. Even then, that's a very hard argument.
I thought it was the collective desire of the community to allow as many Pokemon as possible into Standard, or have I been missing something?I mean obviously you'll have the people who would slit my throat for suggesting we ban Azelf or whatever, but this is basically identical to a situation we found ourselves in with Garchomp. Even though banning Yache Berry would have probably guaranteed Garchomp a spot in OU, the idea wasn't taken seriously because "it's Garchomp's fault." No other pokemon caused any sort of problems with it, so how could we possibly turn around and ban Yache Berry instead of the pokemon who "made" it broken?
I don't even think we've even decided on a "collective desire." It certainly isn't to allow as many pokemon as possible into standard though.I thought it was the collective desire of the community to allow as many Pokemon as possible into Standard, or have I been missing something?
Please correct me if I am wrong.
so your saying that if deoxys had no moves other than splash you would still want it to be uber but if there was a Pokemon that learned every move in the game and had all base stats equal to 1000, and it was a normal non legendary pokemon you would want it allowed because it "doesnt fit the profile of an uber"I think only GF should be able to change the metagame, or we get what i think we have now-a lot of junior modding by the community. Im not sure where people get the idea ubers are pokes too good for the metagame-i thought it was pretty clear from GF materiel what pokes are uber and which are legends and which are normal. Its my opinion that garchomp simply is not a uber;it breaks the mold of ubers. for one thing, its a evolved form and another, its seen in hands of trainers ingame and you can go on. I think if you compare its "mechanics of existence" for lack of better phrase, it shares little in common with ubers. Deoxys-e is an uber regardless if its stats are 20 and it only has splash-its STILL an uber. And i agree entirely with sirlin;i would much rather people use garchomp on me so i can play the legitimate game(and i almost feel every win i get with these bans deserves an asterisk-sure i won but what if i had played in the real world, not smogon sandbox?). I hadnt heard about scrubs before but it explains the bans entirely to me.
My .02$
youve been a member of smogon for over two and a half years and you post this. i'm sorry to burst your bubble, but nintendo did not create this game to create a competitive community. because of this we have scratched nintendo's shitty normal/legendary way of viewing things and put pokemon in the proper tiers. This is why mewtwo is uber, IT WOULD OVERCENTRALIZE OU TO NO END, not because it is a "legendary" in the game.I think only GF should be able to change the metagame, or we get what i think we have now-a lot of junior modding by the community. Im not sure where people get the idea ubers are pokes too good for the metagame-i thought it was pretty clear from GF materiel what pokes are uber and which are legends and which are normal. Its my opinion that garchomp simply is not a uber;it breaks the mold of ubers. for one thing, its a evolved form and another, its seen in hands of trainers ingame and you can go on. I think if you compare its "mechanics of existence" for lack of better phrase, it shares little in common with ubers. Deoxys-e is an uber regardless if its stats are 20 and it only has splash-its STILL an uber. And i agree entirely with sirlin;i would much rather people use garchomp on me so i can play the legitimate game(and i almost feel every win i get with these bans deserves an asterisk-sure i won but what if i had played in the real world, not smogon sandbox?). I hadnt heard about scrubs before but it explains the bans entirely to me.
My .02$