thesecondbest
Just Kidding I'm First
OK here's how you too can calculate stats:
- First I adjusted all the stats to be 1630 ones.
- change the mirror match column to be .5
- then list the usage stat of each type in alphabetical order
- matrix multiply the match up table by the usage stats
Tada!
So for those of you saying starts are unable to say what is truly happening in the meta, these are correct and COMPLETELY OBJECTIVE. That is why using starts is a million times better than any other method.
As for what I said, skarm is the best Mon on the two most broken types. In both of them it creates an unbreakable core that has made its type OP af. Banning it would balance out the meta for sure. I don't know where you guys get the idea that stats are unreliable because that is exactly what they are not. Why are win rates bad? I mean maybe the ladder isn't an SRS of type matchups, but I don't see any other possible issue. If this is a bad metric then come up with a better one because numbers never lie.
- First I adjusted all the stats to be 1630 ones.
- change the mirror match column to be .5
- then list the usage stat of each type in alphabetical order
- matrix multiply the match up table by the usage stats
Tada!
So for those of you saying starts are unable to say what is truly happening in the meta, these are correct and COMPLETELY OBJECTIVE. That is why using starts is a million times better than any other method.
As for what I said, skarm is the best Mon on the two most broken types. In both of them it creates an unbreakable core that has made its type OP af. Banning it would balance out the meta for sure. I don't know where you guys get the idea that stats are unreliable because that is exactly what they are not. Why are win rates bad? I mean maybe the ladder isn't an SRS of type matchups, but I don't see any other possible issue. If this is a bad metric then come up with a better one because numbers never lie.