In general, Blizzard's considered a bad move. Just about everything that can learn it either learns Ice Beam or just doesn't need the coverage.Any good blizzard users that don't need to use mega evolution to Git Gud?
In general, Blizzard's considered a bad move. Just about everything that can learn it either learns Ice Beam or just doesn't need the coverage.Any good blizzard users that don't need to use mega evolution to Git Gud?
Leftiez has used a sweet Crawdaunt set that you can find in the creative/underrated sets thread because its Ice Beam isn't powerful enough to efficiently lure and KO what its aiming to. Other than that, it sucks ass.Any good blizzard users that don't need to use mega evolution to Git Gud?
Kyu-B, fast electrics (thundy raikou manec) and LO StarmieWell, in that case, what's a good Ice beam/ boltbeam user that doesn't need to mega evolve?
The data could be easily manipulated by players who give multiple mega stones in a match. technically a team with 2 megas which you change which one you use depending on the matchup as well, meaning that the data is really not reliable. Finally, something like Alakazam - of which both forms' individual usage is below the OU boundary but both combined puts it above the boundary - would risk being in the wrong tier despite getting enough usage to warrant being OU.Could you take account of the usage for a Pokemon that can Mega Evolve, when they aren't carrying a Mega Stone?
Virtually nobody uses more than 1 Mega, since only one Pokemon can Mega Evolve each team. I'm sure that that the vast majority of people who use Altaria, Charizard, Pinsir, Medicham, Venusaur, and Sableye, pretty much always have them carry a Mega Stone, since their Mega Evolution is what is really viable.The data could be easily manipulated by players who give multiple mega stones in a match. technically a team with 2 megas which you change which one you use depending on the matchup as well, meaning that the data is really not reliable. Finally, something like Alakazam - of which both forms' individual usage is below the OU boundary but both combined puts it above the boundary - would risk being in the wrong tier despite getting enough usage to warrant being OU.
It's been discussed in the policy review, and if you use the assumption that a Pokemon holding a Mega Stone is being used with the intent of using its Mega form, then yes you can. We simply choose not to at this moment because it would cause a large number of mons to drop into other tiers, which would destabilize just about every usage-based tier but OU. Thus we're waiting until the next generation to implement this system, though whether that means Gen 7 or Pokemon Z is still uncertainCould you take account of the usage for a Pokemon that can Mega Evolve, when they aren't carrying a Mega Stone?
While a user could attempt to manipulate the data by bringing in multiple stones, you'd have to have an absurd number of players doing this to get noticeable effects. Further, if they were doing this to try and manipulate tiering, their ranks would have to be absurdly high given the use of a sub-par team to seriously affect tiering, and when you get high enough to affect tiering, you're playing to win, not to manipulate dataThe data could be easily manipulated by players who give multiple mega stones in a match. technically a team with 2 megas which you change which one you use depending on the matchup as well, meaning that the data is really not reliable.
That's not really a huge deal. That just means both will drop to UU, and if Alakazam is deemed Okay in UU but MegaZam is broken, they'd just put the Mega in BL and let Alakazam be used normally. It's not like OU can't use either of themFinally, something like Alakazam - of which both forms' individual usage is below the OU boundary but both combined puts it above the boundary - would risk being in the wrong tier despite getting enough usage to warrant being OU.
It's been discussed in the policy review, and if you use the assumption that a Pokemon holding a Mega Stone is being used with the intent of using its Mega form, then yes you can. We simply choose not to at this moment because it would cause a large number of mons to drop into other tiers, which would destabilize just about every usage-based tier but OU. Thus we're waiting until the next generation to implement this system, though whether that means Gen 7 or Pokemon Z is still uncertain
While a user could attempt to manipulate the data by bringing in multiple stones, you'd have to have an absurd number of players doing this to get noticeable effects. Further, if they were doing this to try and manipulate tiering, their ranks would have to be absurdly high given the use of a sub-par team to seriously affect tiering, and when you get high enough to affect tiering, you're playing to win, not to manipulate data
That's not really a huge deal. That just means both will drop to UU, and if Alakazam is deemed Okay in UU but MegaZam is broken, they'd just put the Mega in BL and let Alakazam be used normally. It's not like OU can't use either of them
I don't see a need. If we treat Megas as their own mons in the future system, then there's no reason why we can't just put it in BL. If you want to be more specific, just put the stone in BL since it accomplishes the same thing.Could they set a different boundary for Mega Evolutions?
It might solve the problem for inaccurately labeling Pokemons as BL.
For Mega Charizard X and Y, the usage for one of the Pokemon might fall lower than boundary, since both of them compete for a Mega Slot.I don't see a need. If we treat Megas as their own mons in the future system, then there's no reason why we can't just put it in BL. If you want to be more specific, just put the stone in BL since it accomplishes the same thing.
Then UU would put them both in BL when they drop to UU if they are too broken in UU. I really don't see the issueFor Mega Charizard X and Y, the usage for one of the Pokemon might fall lower than boundary, since both of them compete for a Mega Slot.
Why Ninetales isn't ranked in OU?
Ninetales has access to Heat Rock, so Drought lasts for 8 turns instead 5 turns. Mega Charizard Y's drought will always last for 5 turns, Charizardite Y fills in an item slot.
Long story short, sun as a playstyle isn't that good in OU, and Ninetales itself, while not bad, is rather lackluster compared to Zard Y. Sure, you could use it to have Mega Houndoom and Chlorophyll Venusaur, but aside from that, there isn't much to play with.Why Ninetales isn't ranked in OU?
Ninetales has access to Heat Rock, so Drought lasts for 8 turns instead 5 turns. Mega Charizard Y's drought will always last for 5 turns, Charizardite Y fills in an item slot.
Ninetails isn't OU because it doesn't have enough usage. Also, sun teams in general aren't amazing imo due to the fact that sun abusers are all basically Fire-types and Grass-types with Chlorophyll/other sun-related abilities/moves, and many Pokemon that take advantage of those sun-related abilities are generally mediocre/shit in OU.Why Ninetales isn't ranked in OU?
Ninetales has access to Heat Rock, so Drought lasts for 8 turns instead 5 turns. Mega Charizard Y's drought will always last for 5 turns, Charizardite Y fills in an item slot.
I know about Ninetales not being OU by usage. I was asking about it being ranked in OU Viability Ranking Thread. I see that Politoed is A- ranked in OU.Ninetails isn't OU because it doesn't have enough usage. Also, sun teams in general aren't amazing imo due to the fact that sun abusers are all basically Fire-types and Grass-types with Chlorophyll/other sun-related abilities/moves, and many Pokemon that take advantage of those sun-related abilities are generally mediocre/shit in OU.
I know about Ninetales not being OU by usage. I was asking about it being ranked in OU Viability Ranking Thread. I see that Politoed is A- ranked in OU.