Raed tihs its so cool

----- Read This -----
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty
uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal
pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a
rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't
mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer
be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed
ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas toghuht slpeling
was ipmorantt! tahts so cool!
Im not breaking Smogon's rule w/ this post right?
 
funny thing about this. sometimes at our store a bunch of religious fuck come in a spread fliers all over the aisles and they had one where it this. although it continued with the misspelled speech about youre going to hell if youre not a christian and you dont pray etc.
 
In the case of the post that you made, it is definitely not true, since it only really applies to short enough words, and words like important are too long and have to be genuinely unscrambled.
 
yes, that
and certain words can be jumbled along certain lines in ways which make them still very readable.

so basically what i'm saying is this is bullshit.
 
I second the "this is cool" opinion. And "according" isn't that short of a word...but I don't mean to offend anyone, and besides that was a bit of a tangent. Anyway. I thought that this was a joke post at first until I read through the whole thing and realized, "wow. they're right. it was a little harder to read than usual but I was still reading it just fine..." I suppose it would become extremely irritating to people who absolutely hate spelling mistakes, though (I was about to be one of those people when I saw the point of this).
 
All of the people who think this only works for short words are being kinda ignorant. As long as you have context to surround the word with, it will be easier to unscramble. That is the entire point of this. You can understand words because of the context.
 
Even with minimal content, you can partially scramble words and it will work.

Obviously if you spell it "patronmint" people might not realize you are saying "important". However, you can scramble the letters and keep the overall structure of the word the same, and then the length of the word doesn't matter (as long as the word is common enough that people will know what it is).


/edit: Something else I've noticed is that you don't want to scramble words to be similar to other words. For instance, I once did this a few years back titled "Improtent! A msut read!" and a lot of people read it as "Impotent!"
 
This is one thing that the human brain can easily distinguish which is kinda hard for computers/programs to pick up on.
 
This is pretty old chain mail. Yes, we know if you keep the first and last letters the same it is readable.

By teh way, it wrkos whit any wrod. No mttaer how cmopticelad.
Uslens it is rdidlucs, lkie antidisestablishmentarianism. No I am not eevn gonig to beothr sracmlbgin taht. It is not hrad to raed eevn in tihs way.
 
Yes, because I stated an opinion, I am clearly ignorant. Thanks for bandying about your typical pejorative stratagems to dismiss your adversaries as always, Justin. The point is being able to QUICKLY realize that hey 'aoubt' is still about, and you cannot do that with something fifteen letters long that you have to think way more about. Quickly, unscramble vrleinut viirelisidutme!!
 
Quickly, unscramble vrleinut viirelisidutme!!

If I said I read it as "virulent verisimilitude" in the same time it would take me to read it written normally, would you believe me? Because I swear I did.
 
i was able to unscramble virulent but i couldn't get verisimilitude. i don't use that word enough. personally i don't think it has much to do with the length of the word, usage seems to be what helped me unscramble the words. take a word like iprmoantt for instance. it is probably relatively easy to figure out what it says. cosineciunots on the other hand probably give you a bit more of a challenge.
 
How does the length not matter? The length, how scrambled up it is, and how often it is used all matter. About to Aubot is fine to unscramble because it is both short and commonly used, and there are not enough letters for it to be significantly scrambled, of course. Even if you still get it in just a second or two seconds more, that is still a lot of time when it takes like 1/3 - 1/2 a second to read a word normally.
 
Back
Top