Normally. Susyou pick two of the four policies you are sent, if everyone votes to allow you as chancellor. normally i would suggest picking the liberal policies, but according to saberslasher there aren't any this time.
Normally. Susyou pick two of the four policies you are sent, if everyone votes to allow you as chancellor. normally i would suggest picking the liberal policies, but according to saberslasher there aren't any this time.
anyone have any thoughts on thisalso i think we should continue to start votes again soon because anarchist is likely slotted out by the no deaths and it doesn't look like we're on track to win by policies
voting off a town member into immediately losing another via the policy gun sounds like a really good way to throw having not considered the implications of what we're doing before doing themanyone have any thoughts on this
I'm personally curious who you would like to vote. I agree the anarchists are well locked out of the game at this point.anyone have any thoughts on this
You choose 2 policies to pass. But you will be receiving all fascist policies.So as chancellor what do I do
Eh, not sure I agree with that being a slip. He is correct that today is an abnormal day since its the first time someone has claimed anything other than 1 liberal policy, and the normal move for chancellor wont be available.Normally. Sus
This one? I mean I agree with Blazade that the pool of presidents almost certainly has a mafia in it. I know I said that. Part of the point of me asking you os to see who is on your mind without me guiding you somewhere.Like who should I start with
"normally" is a very reasonable thing to say thereNormally. Sus
I think we should vig someone today and then maybe start voting people out tomorrow.anyone have any thoughts on this
right, i don't know why blazade and saber keep trying to push me during this cycle, but i'd like to stop that in its tracks right nowWe're at the point where where mafians can start taking 50-50s (as either president or chancellor) in exchange for legislation and conceivably win the game. This becomes essentially impossible if even one of them dies.
We're also at the point where there there are at most 5 more votes before the game ends, and probably around 3 or 4 realistically. I'm assuming that if the policies that would end the game are approved at the same time a vote occurs that would create a fascist or anarchist majority, the policy victory takes precedence Dead by Daylight can you clarify?
Point being the anarchists need 8 dead and control exactly one of the 9 potential kills from here that could happen and we can continue to vote no execution at any time in this process. They're not worth considering compared to the fascists and I'm prepared to start voting out former presidents to see if we get lucky and just straight up win. Or see what opinions others have.
Vote: Carl The Turtle
My expertise in WIFOM tells me S!Pigeon claims a PRIm a VT
No that’s a lie, SJ is OSMy expertise in WIFOM tells me S!Pigeon claims a PR
Vote: saberslasher11