kamikaze:3
MajorBowman: 3, same reasoning as miltankmilk
Marilli: no. ferro’s weakness to marsh and fires, as well as its speed, make it really unreliable as a defensive to anything. It checks koko, but then you pair it with a volcanion / marshadow, and suddenly it doesn’t check koko. It has a big bad 4mss too.
Memoric:3, “it’s really good but will always be haunted by the fact that certain mus hound it.” (
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/doubles-ou-viability-rankings.3592903/page-12#post-7564570). Also it can just be a dud and that can make you a really sad boy
miltankmilk: I love ferro but I think 3 is the correct spot for it. As great as it is defensively, it can be a big momentum suck, using rocks as an option requires dropping leech or gyro (both of which suck to lose). I think 3 is a fine place for it. People are adapting to ferro pretty well too (heat wave zap, not terrible fires, marsh exists)
Qsns: 3. ferro has gotten even worse since the last vote 2 weeks ago. It had a poor Snake showing with high usage and the appearance of way more random fire coverage hurts it a ton.
shaian: no ugly momentum sucks cant be tier 2. Also people are rocking hp fire and what not everywhere so lol my last post about ferro was dead on. Gottem ;)