Good post mate, I will only answer to some points where there is an issue of misunderstanding :
1) About the special set of Floatzel, your comparaison there is a bit problematic. Frosttom didnt need to run a different set to pass stuff like Grumpig, it could only Volt switch on it and send a mon which threats its countr. It was always true except if you play unviable mon outside of Frosttom (basically Seaking/Chinchou). If you play BU Floatzel, this mon is walled as long as the opposite counter is on the ground. That's a big difference which is very important, Floatzel can pass your own counter but only in bringing a different set which is less flexible than the traditionnal Physical one. And again, Floatzel isn't the only mon in ZU which is in this position, Pokémon such as Pinsir, Electivire, Komala,... doesnt have real true counters according to their set.
2) Agree with you.
3) Here, you totally misundertood my point so I'm going to explain it again.
I've never said that these niche mons were the perfect true counters to Frosttom and Stoutland. I said these niche mons were a lot used only due to the presence of the fridge and the dog. You can always talk about the efficiency of these mons in countering/checking them (and i can be agree with you about that but just not the subject here), the problem is to use in large quantities only niche mons to counter a threat.
We lack of good stats because I dont think there is someone which made the usage in tournaments and the ladder is pretty bad. I will use only the usage stats of the september month of the ladder because it was a month with a suspect ladder so there were more people who play it and more good players than usually. I'm totally aware that it is not perfect stats but we dont have unfortunately better numbers.
What you can notice it's the usage of mons which are just correct or even bad outside of Stoutland. You can notice Avalugg is ZU with these stats, Dusclops too, Mawile as well, Tangela is pretty high, Hippopotas is very high for a lol reason, etc etc. Of course these mons aren't perfect Stoutland counters but there are used simply because Stoutland existed and if Stoutland wasn't here, they wouldn't have eexisted
It's the same but to a lesser extend with Frosttom with stuff like Seaking, Chinchou or even sometimes Color Change Kecleon which were used to switch only for Frosttom.
And the most important thing, I didnt say that to compare the degree of brokeness of any mons but to point the difference in the centralization between Floatzel and what an usual S rank does.
We often heard that Floatzel is overcentralizing and it's one of these arguments to keep Floatzel S rank. But that's not a really fair point, the mons which are usually used to check it are totally viable even outside of Floatzel's match up. Gourgeist-Super will be anyway used even without Floatzel, same for Silvally-Water, Swanna or Mareanie because Combusken or Monferno both exist. Electivire or Zebstrika are great mons even if you dont face Floatzel. What I wanted to show, it was NOT a debate about does Seaking / Carbink were true counters to Frosttom / Stoutland (it's a non sense, it's not the subject) but that the degree of centralization of Floatzel is nothing comparable with what a real centralization is, as we have seen before.
You talked about Frilish and Slowpok to counter Floatzel but lets be serious, these mons aren't used like Seaking was, like Dusclops was. I played Frilish/Lampent to counter Monferno / Combusken when i didnt want to play Mareanie, i could also play Slowpoke, but it's not that which makes mons S worthy. Except if we see a peak of use of frilish in the futur, it's just a meme.
4) I dont understand pretty well the subject of the fourth point so I will try to answer in the best way I can
I guess Floatzel can Switcheroo... But without the choice specs what does it too exactly against stall ? And Pyukumuku runs usually Z-Toxic on stall (and not only due to Floatzel by the way, just to deal with general taunt users such as Vigoroth, Simipour, Simisear, etc).
And again, all these mons would be used even without Floatzel because you need them against Combusken or Monferno.
I dont know why you're talking about Gothitelle because she wasn't played. I dont think she has a large use in tournaments either. If you have informations about this, dont hesitate to send me links because i dont understand well why she comes here.
I dont understand well either why you're talking about Probopass because it arrived in the same time than Stoutland so it's hard to say if it was used only due to Frosttom or due to Stoutland. Anyway, one thing is sure now, it's not used anymore.
I hope I was clear this time. Thank you for your answer.
1) About the special set of Floatzel, your comparaison there is a bit problematic. Frosttom didnt need to run a different set to pass stuff like Grumpig, it could only Volt switch on it and send a mon which threats its countr. It was always true except if you play unviable mon outside of Frosttom (basically Seaking/Chinchou). If you play BU Floatzel, this mon is walled as long as the opposite counter is on the ground. That's a big difference which is very important, Floatzel can pass your own counter but only in bringing a different set which is less flexible than the traditionnal Physical one. And again, Floatzel isn't the only mon in ZU which is in this position, Pokémon such as Pinsir, Electivire, Komala,... doesnt have real true counters according to their set.
2) Agree with you.
3) Here, you totally misundertood my point so I'm going to explain it again.
I've never said that these niche mons were the perfect true counters to Frosttom and Stoutland. I said these niche mons were a lot used only due to the presence of the fridge and the dog. You can always talk about the efficiency of these mons in countering/checking them (and i can be agree with you about that but just not the subject here), the problem is to use in large quantities only niche mons to counter a threat.
We lack of good stats because I dont think there is someone which made the usage in tournaments and the ladder is pretty bad. I will use only the usage stats of the september month of the ladder because it was a month with a suspect ladder so there were more people who play it and more good players than usually. I'm totally aware that it is not perfect stats but we dont have unfortunately better numbers.
What you can notice it's the usage of mons which are just correct or even bad outside of Stoutland. You can notice Avalugg is ZU with these stats, Dusclops too, Mawile as well, Tangela is pretty high, Hippopotas is very high for a lol reason, etc etc. Of course these mons aren't perfect Stoutland counters but there are used simply because Stoutland existed and if Stoutland wasn't here, they wouldn't have eexisted
It's the same but to a lesser extend with Frosttom with stuff like Seaking, Chinchou or even sometimes Color Change Kecleon which were used to switch only for Frosttom.
And the most important thing, I didnt say that to compare the degree of brokeness of any mons but to point the difference in the centralization between Floatzel and what an usual S rank does.
We often heard that Floatzel is overcentralizing and it's one of these arguments to keep Floatzel S rank. But that's not a really fair point, the mons which are usually used to check it are totally viable even outside of Floatzel's match up. Gourgeist-Super will be anyway used even without Floatzel, same for Silvally-Water, Swanna or Mareanie because Combusken or Monferno both exist. Electivire or Zebstrika are great mons even if you dont face Floatzel. What I wanted to show, it was NOT a debate about does Seaking / Carbink were true counters to Frosttom / Stoutland (it's a non sense, it's not the subject) but that the degree of centralization of Floatzel is nothing comparable with what a real centralization is, as we have seen before.
You talked about Frilish and Slowpok to counter Floatzel but lets be serious, these mons aren't used like Seaking was, like Dusclops was. I played Frilish/Lampent to counter Monferno / Combusken when i didnt want to play Mareanie, i could also play Slowpoke, but it's not that which makes mons S worthy. Except if we see a peak of use of frilish in the futur, it's just a meme.
4) I dont understand pretty well the subject of the fourth point so I will try to answer in the best way I can
Floatzel cannot be Taunt / Switcheroo / Physical Bulk Up Taunt / Hidden power Electric at the same time in the same set. You forget that if you play BulkUp Floatzel, you are totally walled by Gourgeist-Super, Mareanie, some Swanna's sets, etc. If you choose to play a different set to be able to pass them (such as special Floatzel), the opponent can just check with a middle play (muk, aboma, whatever vally). Just a move is enough to see the set. And again, the special set relys far more on prediction than the physical one and lack of power without, that's why it is a bit less played.Forget the fact that the amount of sets Floatzel can run is to the point where you could be sacking something if you guess incorrectly, or the fact that Taunt/Switcheroo shuts down/cripples the majority of Floatzel checks bar maybe Gourgeist-Super, Silvally-Water, and bulky Swanna. I think I already touched upon the main issue with Gourgeist-Super (the fact that it cannot at all deal with LO/Specs Ice Beam), but bulky Swanna is threatened by a possible Hidden Power Electric tech.
Silvally-Water was a viable mon even before Floatzel. It has always been in the A rank (A- before Floatzel came iirc). Thunderbolt has always been played due to Mareanie. Now that Frosttom is gone, Seaking is somewhere betwen C- and Unranked. Silvally-Water isn't at all the Seaking of Frosttom, Vally-W has always been excellent.Thunderbolt Silvally-Water is the one true defensive Floatzel counter, the Seaking to Floatzel's metaphorical Frostom.
Komala Wish + Silvally Water is a great core... And not only due to Floatzel by the way. Wish + a Vally has always been good but it was only played in some stall (which wasn't the best playstyle few month ago) due to how passive Licky was. Komala is a better wish passer Sure, it's less easy than the classic Leftovers + recover but if you lack of staying power, it's a good option.While these calcs definitely show Silvally-Water can handle Floatzel (also cannot be Switcheroo'd), this is negating the fact that Silvally-Water has no recovery outside of Rest (which is like, why would you sacrifice STAB or the compression Defog can provide?).
252 SpA Choice Specs Floatzel Hidden Power Electric vs. 252 HP / 40 SpD Pyukumuku: 114-136 (36.3 - 43.3%) -- 98.6% chance to 3HKO after Leftovers recoveryAnother huge issue with your point here is not every team archetype wants to run a revenge killer. Stall does not run Electivire/Zebstrika/Scarf [insert super-effective type-advantaged offensive Floatzel check] so I generally cannot identify with this statement. So, by this train of logic, one can argue Floatzel invalidates stall to some degree, as stall cannot revenge kill Floatzel.
I guess Floatzel can Switcheroo... But without the choice specs what does it too exactly against stall ? And Pyukumuku runs usually Z-Toxic on stall (and not only due to Floatzel by the way, just to deal with general taunt users such as Vigoroth, Simipour, Simisear, etc).
Silvally-Water has always been in the top three in the ZU meta and is the one which stays there during the longest time. Yeah, without Floatzel, it would be less used than currently but it would stay excellent. It's nothing comparable with Seaking which was B rank when Frosttom was there and at the moment at the limit to be Unranked. Mareanie forced to run Sludge Bomb it's like Floatzel forced to run Hidden Power Electric to pass Swanna, the meta adapts to the new threats without it's a sign of an intensive centralization. Z-Toxic Pyukumuku has always been a set in stall teams to avoid to be 6-0 by Taunt Vigoroth / Simipour / Simisear. You exaggerate the influence that Floatzel really exerces on the meta.While Gourgeist-Super, Silvally-Water, Mareanie, Pyukumuku, and Swanna definitely are great Pokemon in their own ways, to attribute their success solely to their power is incorrect. I doubt Silvally-Water would be THE Silvally in a Floatzel-less meta, or that Mareanie would be forced to run Sludge Bomb to deal with a Choice item being Switcheroo'd onto it, or that Pyukumuku would be forced to run Z-Move to not have to deal with Switcheroo/get a one-time Taunt bypass.
And again, all these mons would be used even without Floatzel because you need them against Combusken or Monferno.
The problem with Frosttom was its ability to Volt Switch on this amount of checks/Counters. If the opponent had Grumpig, you could send it on Frosttom but the only thing which happens is you lose 25% of your life on Volt Switch and then you lose the Momentum because the opponent brings a solid mon which threats your frosttom's switch in. That's why an electric immunity was mandatory but the problem was that the majority of electric immunity was severely hurt by Blizzard. That's why Seaking was so popular. Again, the situation is different with Floatzel. If you play Taunt Bulk Up, as long as there is a Mareanie or a Gourgeist in the opposite team, your Floatzel cannot do anything. You cannot take the Momentum with it, you cannot weaken the opponent.I think something you neglect in this part, mostly for the point of Frostom as an S-rank who had no "normally viable" checks/counters, is the AMOUNT of Frostom checks/counters that were agreed upon by the community as solid Frostom checks/counters. While I would hate to overhype, Groundium-Z Smack Down Probopass, Gothitelle (one of the main reasons it got ranked was that a Mago Berry + Recycle set could tank Icium-Z), and Grumpig come to mind, beyond Seaking. Something to note: this is where another parallel of Frostom/Floatzel comes into play. A handful of their checks have uses beyond checking [x]. During Frostom meta, Grumpig was also used to check Fire-types such as Monferno, in addition to being a bulky special wall. Gothitelle pressured Defoggers via Competitive, making it a better Grumpig for Mareanie spikestack, but worse in most other scenarios. Groundium-Z Smack Down Probopass was a Bronzor lure. I won't touch on Stoutland as that is a totally different case, but I will concede that Stoutland ran through its "checks" (see above).
I dont know why you're talking about Gothitelle because she wasn't played. I dont think she has a large use in tournaments either. If you have informations about this, dont hesitate to send me links because i dont understand well why she comes here.
I dont understand well either why you're talking about Probopass because it arrived in the same time than Stoutland so it's hard to say if it was used only due to Frosttom or due to Stoutland. Anyway, one thing is sure now, it's not used anymore.
I hope I was clear this time. Thank you for your answer.
Last edited: