Conversations are just the forum equivalent to DMs. It's a private conversation between only the participants of the conversation, from 2 to pretty large numbers if you want a group chat.
All drafts simply get cleared after awhile, so "drafts" in the sandbox forum would just be full threads instead, which won't be deleted
ok thank you
The idea of those sets, especially Torn-T, is to sort of "test the waters." I'm going to use Torn-T as an example. If Torn-T gets in, right off the bat it has a choice on whether it wants to pose a threat by clicking Nasty Plot or keep momentum by clicking U-turn. If the opponent makes an aggressive play and say, switches Kyurem in as Torn-T Nasty Plots, Torn-T again has the option of clicking Focus Blast or hitting U-turn and not taking any risks.
I just manually copied the url, here it is:
There isn’t any restrictions to your profile picture; just be sure to not put anything NSFW on it (except if you crop it, which is acceptable)
Alrighty then. Thank you.
Certain email hosts have been almost exclusively used to create spam accounts with, so they aren't currently valid for use. It's primarily those that would be affected by this. It's a bit unfortunate when it happens, but please use a different one.
This has been suggested and rejected in the past in both the natdex and doubles sqsa threads, I'm not sure if their decision is still as firm after a few months but to my knowledge there are no plans for a natdex doubles tier currently. The proper way to suggest formats can be found here though Format suggestions - Pokémon Showdown! (pokemonshowdown.com)
I don't think OI really want most of those more casual Pokémon threads (tier lists or what have you) that come out of Smogoff. I've found OI to be fairly structured, with plenty of active threads that encompass a lot of different topics already.
I don't exactly remember how xf1 was, but this is how xf2 actually looks like completely unmodified for comparison:
Seeing as we've already modified the base xf2 style quite a bit, It's probably doable from a technical standpoint. I do think we'll continue to have this sort of problem regardless, as it's often newer users who make these sort of mistakes and probably don't spend too much time looking in to what's allowed and what's not (see the OU and various analyses subforums). It's also not the biggest thing to have to deal with as a mod + it's not like it's a structural issue where even experienced users are confused.
