I believe only Doug's #1, KoA's and Soy-Monk's may have CompoundEyes.Ironically, none of them have Compoundeyes.
People love the ability but couldn't give a shit how it actually works with regards to the art.
Hee hee hee.big, bold Venonat ones.
Also also, this should definitely come to a second vote with the top 3 picks. The art is pretty damn important.
Cooper already thought ahead.Also, this will be a three-part poll. The first will narrow the eight drawings to four, the second will narrow four to two, and the third will decide the winner. In the interest of time, each poll will only be open for two days. The winner is usually decided by then anyway. So without further ado, these are your choices:
Wow, it was my opinion. No need at all to go crazy over it. Although, Pokémon are generally simply done with no really complex detail. Soy-Monk's artwork has far too much detail and looks like a Digimon imo.Then is it suppose to look like then? No I'm serious, that has alway bugged me when people make fake pokemon and such. What does a pokemon suppose to look like anyway? Is there a clear and soild defintion/guildline on how a pokemon, real and/or made up is suppose to look like?