OU & NU Leader
This is an impossible ask. On the general side, we have a publicized tiering policy framework that gives definitions and whatnot. However, applying this principal to the current metagame is oftentimes a matter of opinion and can be discussed on dozens of different fronts. There’s a reason why we have suspect discussions, votes, and surveys — the community decides what is banworthy (I.e: broken, uncompetitive, etc.) more often than not and that’s how the system is designed. We are already working towards being more publicized with council minutes coming soon and me posting frequently, but this ask is not particularly reasonable for any council or leading group that assigns power to their community.I still think that if anything remotely related to trapping is allowed in the tier, then the council should at least make an official statement about what exactly is competitive or not.
This and the entire second half of your post has no place here. It’s a thread clearly geared towards current metagame discussion; it’s been made public repeatedly that if you have issues with timing or process, you can PM the council. There cannot possibly be anything gained by this and you know that.I just wanna know, am I the only one who thinks that Zamazenta was tested at a wrong time?