Finally, the worst suspect thread is dead
And for the people who even without a solution to that still would not like Terapagos bc "complex ban", no, "you cannot use a gimmick on this Pokemon" is not actually a complicated rule people, I'm sorry. The community went over this in a Policy Review thread, and you can see the people's opinions in the responses. The "Complex Bans are Terrible" Tiering Policy nerds/staff have lost the battle of public opinion by a lot, most people who just wanted a good game already agreed that Terapagos should be unbanned. If the vast majority of people actually think the "complex ban solution" is actually more intuitive than the tiering policy/staff's, it's time to accept that it is not gospel.
Take the Pokemon in Ubers and OU and list it as two separate entities in the builder. Track Ubers as is now, and track the OU Terapagos as a separate Pokemon. Or better yet, since Terapagos is only in two tiers in this scenario, does it really matter?"We do not have the ability to track this mon separately,"
And for the people who even without a solution to that still would not like Terapagos bc "complex ban", no, "you cannot use a gimmick on this Pokemon" is not actually a complicated rule people, I'm sorry. The community went over this in a Policy Review thread, and you can see the people's opinions in the responses. The "Complex Bans are Terrible" Tiering Policy nerds/staff have lost the battle of public opinion by a lot, most people who just wanted a good game already agreed that Terapagos should be unbanned. If the vast majority of people actually think the "complex ban solution" is actually more intuitive than the tiering policy/staff's, it's time to accept that it is not gospel.