Okay then explain that if he meant every death, why did he word it so the objection was in general to all of them. If anything that could be a potential slip made in frustration that his partners killed hawkie and texas against his wishes. It's a reach, but both ways one reads it I can easily see scum hitmon making that statement.I didn't say scum wouldn't say that, I said scum leet wouldnt say that.
Since as much as he's voicing against the mislynches, he is also saying that about the kills and no offense to leet, but I don't think his scum game is clever enough to say that unprompted as in the past leet has shown a very subdued scum game
Like. Yes maybe grandstanding or maybe leets scum game has just straight up gotten better. But for now I'm fine with that slot unless the current ventures fail
TIL that everyone thinks I'm a terrible scumI didn't say scum wouldn't say that, I said scum leet wouldnt say that.
Since as much as he's voicing against the mislynches, he is also saying that about the kills and no offense to leet, but I don't think his scum game is clever enough to say that unprompted as in the past leet has shown a very subdued scum game
Like. Yes maybe grandstanding or maybe leets scum game has just straight up gotten better. But for now I'm fine with that slot unless the current ventures fail
TIL that LightWolf thinks I don't have two brain cells to rub togetherOkay then explain that if he meant every death, why did he word it so the objection was in general to all of them. If anything that could be a potential slip made in frustration that his partners killed hawkie and texas against his wishes. It's a reach, but both ways one reads it I can easily see scum hitmon making that statement.
That first bit doesn't make any sense to me (Why did he word every death if he meant every death?)Okay then explain that if he meant every death, why did he word it so the objection was in general to all of them. If anything that could be a potential slip made in frustration that his partners killed hawkie and texas against his wishes. It's a reach, but both ways one reads it I can easily see scum hitmon making that statement.
His sentence reads as all his town reads died despite onjecting to them, which is why I called Freudian Slip. Which btw Hitmon doesn't mean you are an idiot.That first bit doesn't make any sense to me (Why did he word every death if he meant every death?)
And I guess? But to barrow your words, that feels like a reach to me and gives me no real reason to push for him at this time
Stop, not another word.I can see a world in which Tex offers Hitmon up as Mason cover. It's a world I'd have to be coaxed into approving of because of the numbers game and the icky thought of Town technically bussing, but I can see it happening.
>Says he isn't calling me an idiotHis sentence reads as all his town reads died despite onjecting to them, which is why I called Freudian Slip. Which btw Hitmon doesn't mean you are an idiot.
Speaking of which Hitmon how about keeping on keeping on with my questions instead of ascertaining your mind dominance.
Also actually quote the whole post when you make an argument. It's unscrupulous otherwise.I've honestly got kind of burnt out now that literally every one of my town reads died in quick succession despite my objections. Gonna be a bit out of things today, sorry.
Solve above, and you can take the recap as reads. Not going to get it all finished today. I'm considering taking dramamine and sleeping through deaqdline.Knights do you have an updated reads list yet
I'll be in a meeting then.kk cool
who gonna be here for eod? ~4 hours