Tbh yea I've been thinking about this for a while now. What's the point of having them in alphabetical order when they could be organized in terms of viability? It makes a lot more sense and would encourage more discussion than with the current system. I personally think all tiers should do this, and there is really no point of them being in alphabetical order, I know that the VR mods are not going to do this but it would be helpfulKartana going to S rank seems hot rn and i really like the free likes i can get from it. (THANKS IN ADVANCE!)
-> S disagree
I do believe that Kartana the best Pokemon in A+, and it can definitely be compared to Landorus-T and Toxapex in terms of effectiveness, it is very splashable, with the recent exploration of Life Orb I think Kartana got even better, Life Orb boosted Knock Off basically breaks what dark-z does at +2 and a boosted Sacred Sword is nothing to laugh at either. Its Choice Scarf set is arguably the best scarfer in the tier considering how good it is at what it does, the role compression that it provides is very nice, it works very well as a Knock Off user and is a surprisingly effective Defogger. However, its sets do all have flaws that can be exploited, SD is relatively lacking in speed and is prone to being revenge killed. Scarf is very hard to pivot around but once its locked itself into a move u should have an answer to that specific move, always.
Despite this, I don't think that Kartana should be S rank, and I know that what im going to propose is very frowned upon but I'd like to propose for a viability ranking system such as ubers:
this gives an easier insight to players on how viable the Pokemon is compared to the other Pokemon in [said sub-rank] rank. We could also make an S- rank but, that is really stupid lmao.