This is probably one of my longest walls of text, so be prepared.
Meat isn't as much of a need as a temptation. We all could survive without it, but it is really what most people crave in a dinner. Why else would people eat meat substitutes? The flavor and texture are just something that can't be duplicated. Sure, we rationalize it, saying that it has vital protein and vitamins. But this is why we eat meat.
I had the pleasure of driving to Pittsburgh to visit Carnegie Mellon this weekend, and I went to an Italian place. I ordered a ravioli dish filled with braised Wagyu beef (like Kobe beef) cooked in savory vegetables and drizzled in tomato rosemary sauce. Oh my fucking god. The best meal I ever had. (I'm making you hungry aren't I? >:-))
Most people, myself included, are not going to take the initiative to become a vegetarian/vegan. It is just too much work for most people. Also, meat isn't as bad as it's made out to be. Many forms of meat, like chicken, are quite good for you.
Originally posted by Fat Ambitions
You can not justify the elimination of species form this Earth, the consumption of 2/3rd of our world fresh water, more carbon emissions the auto industry, as well as pain and suffering, for the satisfying taste of sitting at the top of the food chain.
First of all, how are we causing mass extinction? We aren't nearly as bad as we used to be at this in America, but I could see how this is a problem in places like India and China.
If you're stressing that animals are more than just human playtoys, then why stress the fresh water consumption of animals? They are just as valid a part of a food chain as humans. It's like saying that since grass planted in backyards need water, we should get make everyone have backyards made of stone. Not to mention that humans do their own share of water-wasting.
I don't know why you're attacking the auto industry, but I can tell you that it is much more important than a crapload of cows. The auto industry is doing a lot to reduce their auto emmisions particularly in Europe and Japan. I do recognize that they are similar since both could be a lot cleaner at the people's will.
Pain and suffering are all relative. Sure, complain and explain all you want, but since you are not a cow/chicken/God, you don't know whether the cows/chickens are actually facing any pain in their death as compared to what their natural life would be. You also don't know what happens after death, or whether it would actually be better for them to die than live.
Similarly, I'm sure some people would think that a life of hardship and death at war after leaving high school is better than a life of being overstressed with a job for 50 years.
And no, when a mountain lion (or any animal, rock slide, natural disaster, etc) kill off an american, I Cheer.
That is a very poor, politically incorrect point of view. Humans killed by natural disasters of which they had no control over is not a cheering matter, although it may not be all bad (to keep with the logic I used in my last paragraph). People think that they are more important than mountain lions, so they go on an outrage when a person i s killed at the hands of a cougar. I say to them: Grow up. It's a fact of life. Everything that lives has a 100% chance of dying. A dictator can't expect to have a 100% approval rating when he takes power on his whim and does whatever he wants (I know, not the best comparison, but gets my basic point across).
I do find it funny when stupid people end up hurting themselves doing something stupid (like a robber shooting himself in the balls on accident). It's just sad that the world will always continue to discriminate a group of people/objects/groups/just about anything based on whatever is most prominent to them.