I posted something about this earlier in SQSA but here it is again to get more opinions.
Hacking wild pokemon to EV train good or bad?
this doesn't seem like a big deal to me as it speeds things up for people who do not have a lot of time.
I posted something about this earlier in SQSA but here it is again to get more opinions.
Hacking wild pokemon to EV train good or bad?
this doesn't seem like a big deal to me as it speeds things up for people who do not have a lot of time.
I... don't know why you'd bother. It's easy enough to do it legitly with 'rus and a power item that hacking out wild pokemon for EVs seems like overkill.
Whats the difference between these two? They BOTH speed up a process which is going to happen anyway. If I am going to hatch 1 000 000 eggs using the 6 step hatch trick until i get strait 31's, it takes the same amount of time as using strait 31 Parents and not using a 6 step hatch trick. IMO either both are fine or both aren't.Is this Considered a Hack or not?
Using Hacked Parents: This, IMO is just as bad as hacking the Pokemon itself. You may argue that "I still went through the process of breeding the Pokemon", but that argument just won't be registered as valid. You have an unfair advantage over someone who does it fairly. Having a godly parent highly effects how the offspring will turn out. So hacking yourself a godly parent IMO would be considered an illegit Pokemon in my view. It is just an attempt at being clever at getting around the fact that you didn't hack the Pokemon itself.
Quick hatch trick/step reduction: This trick basically cuts down the number of steps you have to take to hatch an egg from thousands to almost nothing (6, IIRC). This, in my opinion, does not ruin legitimacy. Yes, you are speeding up a process that would otherwise take much, much longer, but you are doing nothing more than speeding up the inevitable. You're going to get those eggs, whether you get them fast or slow. Yes, this indeed does give you an advantage over others. Though I don't think using this trick ruins legitimacy, I still think you should inform anyone you're trading with that you used this method to hatch your egg.
I suppose you could. It still seems like overkill for something that takes about 20 minutes or so anyway, unless you're aiming for complicated spreads, in which case re-inputting the codes might take the same amount of time as you're saving anyway.Yah but u could hack something worth 3 EVs instead of 1 or 2 and make them the only type that shows up making it just a little bit smoother. :naughty:
I suppose you could. It still seems like overkill for something that takes about 20 minutes or so anyway, unless you're aiming for complicated spreads, in which case re-inputting the codes might take the same amount of time as you're saving anyway.
IMO it's still technically hacking, but, like the breeding hacks, not something that's really detectable.
You can see I've never actually used an AR. XD I take it back then, but it still seems pointless to me.Actually you dont have to reput in codes just toss out a diff number of masterballs![]()
Using Hacked Parents: This, IMO is just as bad as hacking the Pokemon itself. You may argue that "I still went through the process of breeding the Pokemon", but that argument just won't be registered as valid. You have an unfair advantage over someone who does it fairly. Having a godly parent highly effects how the offspring will turn out. So hacking yourself a godly parent IMO would be considered an illegit Pokemon in my view. It is just an attempt at being clever at getting around the fact that you didn't hack the Pokemon itself.
Quick hatch trick/step reduction: This trick basically cuts down the number of steps you have to take to hatch an egg from thousands to almost nothing (6, IIRC). This, in my opinion, does not ruin legitimacy. Yes, you are speeding up a process that would otherwise take much, much longer, but you are doing nothing more than speeding up the inevitable. You're going to get those eggs, whether you get them fast or slow. Yes, this indeed does give you an advantage over others. Though I don't think using this trick ruins legitimacy, I still think you should inform anyone you're trading with that you used this method to hatch your egg.
Meh, I don't even have AR, but on the hacked parent subject, I could personally care less from a data standpoint. Technically the pokemon is created legally, just from illegal sources.
I'll use a metaphor... So lets say a child is born to two criminals wanted for, idk, robbing a bank. You don't arrest the kid just because their parents are bad, right?
Perhaps I choose to use that metaphor in a somewhat extreme point, but you still get my point. If the pokemon is created legally I consider it legal withen the game's limits, then its still legit. I know Smogon is quire strict about this, but I don't even own AR so I could care less really. As long as I don't get cheated in a battle/trade, I'm fine.
Since when did Pokemon have rights? :P
Hacked parents shows up in the hex data. If you got hack checked at an official nintendo event, you would probably be DQ'd.True, but as I said, judging from the games data, it is still considered legit.
I'm actually against hacking myself for the most part (cloning, getting items, etc. is fine), but if someone were to offer me a really good pokemon and say, "Oh, by the way, it turns out the quad-flawless parents of that pokemon were hacked, do you still care for it?", I would still gladly accept and consider it legit, as the pokemon itself wasn't directly hacked with AR.
I'm not saying it is not wrong, I'm just stating my opinion in saying I find it acceptable to a certain degree.
One shows up if you check hex data, the other, as far as I know, doesn't.Whats the difference between these two? They BOTH speed up a process which is going to happen anyway. If I am going to hatch 1 000 000 eggs using the 6 step hatch trick until i get strait 31's, it takes the same amount of time as using strait 31 Parents and not using a 6 step hatch trick. IMO either both are fine or both aren't.
What if your pokemon's parent was one with EV's hacked onto it. As I am doing a breeding Project for TheMantyke and the parent he gave me had its EV's hacked onto it. Also when using this parent EVERY egg i get has the Dittos nature XD Ive hatched over 100 Jolly eggs in a row... :SHacked parents shows up in the hex data. If you got hack checked at an official nintendo event, you would probably be DQ'd.
One shows up if you check hex data, the other, as far as I know, doesn't.
Hacked parents shows up in the hex data. If you got hack checked at an official nintendo event, you would probably be DQ'd.
True, but as I said, judging from the games data, it is still considered legit.
I'm actually against hacking myself for the most part (cloning, getting items, etc. is fine), but if someone were to offer me a really good pokemon and say, "Oh, by the way, it turns out the quad-flawless parents of that pokemon were hacked, do you still care for it?", I would still gladly accept and consider it legit, as the pokemon itself wasn't directly hacked with AR.
I'm not saying it is not wrong, I'm just stating my opinion in saying I find it acceptable to a certain degree.
This sums up my thoughts.My personal opinion is that you should either not use any hacks at all, or use all of them.
If you, say, use the immediate hatching hack and not any other hack, then you could just as well hack your baby with perfect IVs, nature and moves, since you WILL eventually obtain such a baby given enough time. The same applies for any other hack, no matter how innocuous it looks.
So my stand is: either just hack your Pokemon straight away, or else don't use ANY hack.