well psy isnt empowered tommy (who was targeting psy) was empowered
who empwoered me?
well psy isnt empowered tommy (who was targeting psy) was empowered
Actually is empowering just making an ability stronger? Phoopes just made it so Psy's ability went through on Bliz I assume, but wouldn't stop if from being blocked, so they could have been RBed too ig?
To be 100% clear since there seems to be some confusion (which may have been cleared up?):
I used my role on psy.
This means that psy's action CANNOT be redirected. It can be blocked (but it seemingly wasn't).
Thus, since psy's action did not fail, that means that if he targeted Bliz as claimed, the action would've went through on Bliz, and would not have been redirected onto anyone else.
Is that clear
phoopes is claiming that his empower is only a redirect empower and that psys ability can be blockedempowered means you cant be blocked, redirected, delayed
empower means your action will land on target basically and cant be disrupted, its like imagine if the bullet is flying, forces stopping the moving bullet wont work, but it can be stopped on hit by example a doctor
so like shock wave in pokemon, it will hit but can be prevented by protection (like protect or detect)
phoopes is claiming that his empower is only a redirect empower and that psys ability can be blocked
I genuinely don’t understand can you rephraseCelever if a role existed that made abilities used on a certain person a , also effect those targetting them b
at what priority would an empower targetting a, kick in and spread to b, if a was also on target redirected
(you deserve this )
Tommy I think you're town but I feel like I've seen you make the "I'm too smart to make mistakes like this" defense before and like I get you're experienced and all but no one is flawless lol.
I do think the "I haven't even reached my final form yet" claim that you get more shit as the game goes on is interesting tho
I genuinely don’t understand can you rephrase
did you also get the 'you may target an extra person' clause or nahbefore we jump to conclusions I must say, this also happened to me.
did you also get the 'you may target an extra person' clause or nah
no, same as phoopesdid you also get the 'you may target an extra person' clause or nah
phoopes, they were forced to do it in addition to their normal submitted action by some third party's rolewho empwoered me?
night resultthis was a night result or happened before the night during submission phase?
phoopes, they were forced to do it in addition to their normal submitted action by some third party's role
theres no guarantee but isnt this a perfectly good explanation that makes quite a lot of sense?theres a chance or he definitely did? he seemed to be claiming to me that its only a random second success and not a guarentee of who it is on
i assume this isnt a global effect bc likeno, same as phoopes
theres no guarantee but isnt this a perfectly good explanation that makes quite a lot of sense?