dont give me that bs. belichick is primarily responsible for the patriots being the most dominant team of the past decade. all good things must come to an end (not necessarily saying this is the end of the patriots reign, but it IS getting close). don't blame belichick for this.I really Hope people understand that Belichick is the problem with the patriots and not brady
As a GM and Coach hes run the team into the ground
Bill Belichick Doesn't even have a winning record as the patriots coach without Tom Bradydont give me that bs. belichick is primarily responsible for the patriots being the most dominant team of the past decade. all good things must come to an end (not necessarily saying this is the end of the patriots reign, but it IS getting close). don't blame belichick for this.
you know whos really the culprit for the pats failures? the O line coach, dante scarnecchia. dude retired after being with the organization for like 20 years, and now the O line is a complete mess.
YepSo instead of chasing out his vets by cutting them if they don't sign pay cuts and trading away players Brady/offense likes (Welker) for even more injury prone replacements (Amendola)...yeah I think his stingyness is finally bearing fruit with subpar talent that can't be coached up as well.
dont give me that bs. belichick is primarily responsible for the patriots being the most dominant team of the past decade. all good things must come to an end (not necessarily saying this is the end of the patriots reign, but it IS getting close). don't blame belichick for this.
you know whos really the culprit for the pats failures? the O line coach, dante scarnecchia. dude retired after being with the organization for like 20 years, and now the O line is a complete mess.
The patriots have 20 more wins than the steelers and 26 more wins than the giants over that time period. So they're averaging almost 3 wins a year more than the giants, and over 2 wins more a year than the steelers. There's a big difference between averaging being a 12.2 win team and a 10 win team...Past decade? Uh no, since 2005 the Giants and maybe Steelers have been the most dominant teams. I'll take super bowl wins over division wins in a terrible division. The Patriots have been good, yes, but there are two teams at least who have been more dominant than them.
hold up, did you just call the giants a "dominant" team? the giants who beat the pats in the 2007 superbowl were anything BUT dominant... they barely squeaked into the playoffs as a wildcard, got hot throughout the playoffs and pulled off probably the greatest upset and one of the THE luckiest plays in NFL history to beat the patriots. they made the superbowl in 2011 in practically the same way. thats not dominance to me. thinking of the giants as dominant is like thinking of eli as a HOF quarterback... it just sounds weird.Past decade? Uh no, since 2005 the Giants and maybe Steelers have been the most dominant teams. I'll take super bowl wins over division wins in a terrible division. The Patriots have been good, yes, but there are two teams at least who have been more dominant than them.
ftfy ;)Too bad Peyton Manning will never break Favre's INT record!
There's a reason Philly cut him after his rookie season. You have to be pretty bad to be cut before you reach age 50 as a kicker :)ftfy ;)
I want to murder every kicker in the state of Michigan.
hold up, did you just call the giants a "dominant" team? the giants who beat the pats in the 2007 superbowl were anything BUT dominant... they barely squeaked into the playoffs as a wildcard, got hot throughout the playoffs and pulled off probably the greatest upset and one of the THE luckiest plays in NFL history to beat the patriots. they made the superbowl in 2011 in practically the same way. thats not dominance to me. thinking of the giants as dominant is like thinking of eli as a HOF quarterback... it just sounds weird.
the steelers were pretty good from 2009-2011. 2 superbowl berths, one win. sounds pretty good. but think of the patriots, who have been consistently good since brady took over. 3 super bowl wins, 5 appearances, like 6 or 7 AFC championship appearances. to me, the pats are a lot like the san antonio spurs: always in playoff contention and consistently a top team in their conference. and both those teams have been doing it for what seems like forever.
Irony.Hope Everyone doesn't overreact to this pats win like they did when they lost last week
The Demise of Tom Brady lol
Dude, the Giants had Eli Manning who was coming off one of the greatest seasons ever by a qb, a defense who manhandled two of the greatest offenses ever, and a team overall who blew out a 15-1 team at their home. Was I wrong to believe this team was the best in the league?Milos, ignore some hero, he's known for being one of the most biased homers on the forums. 2 years ago he tried to give us a serious discussion and debate on why the Giants would go 16-0 during the 2012 season, etc. Just reply to everyone elses posts but his. I miss YTP btw, what happened to him :(
Eli Manning's 2011 numbers: 61.0 comp %, 4933 yds, 8.4 YPA, 29 TD/16 INTDude, the Giants had Eli Manning who was coming off one of the greatest seasons ever by a qb, a defense who manhandled two of the greatest offenses ever, and a team overall who blew out a 15-1 team at their home. Was I wrong to believe this team was the best in the league?
But I didn't see the offensive collapse that was to come. I saw it after the first egg game but it was too late. The OC was going to take the team down with him. I put 0 blame on Eli for 12/13. The dudes 2011 season was THAT ridiculous. If it weren't for Rodgers Eli should have been MVP.
I am half tempted to edit that into his post XDIt's one of the best seasons ever by a QB named Eli Manning.