i need some help, im kinda a noob at this. so i saw a shuckle analysis in the QC rejected area in this thread. would i ask the origianal writer if i could take over that analysis, and then if he agrees, i would post here that i am now doing it?
If it was already QC rejected then the original author loses the rights to that analysis, so you can start it again on your own steam. However, it has to be sufficiently different from the one already rejected and needs to provide convincing reasoning as to why it shouldn't be rejected for a second time (for example, if you have a new set that exploits a hitherto undiscovered niche in the metagame, or whether the relative viability of previously rejected sets has been increased as a result of tiering changes or metagame shifts).
If you do not provide this reasoning, then your analysis is likely to be locked. Don't let this put you off trying, though, if you genuinely think that Shuckle is viable (I wouldn't personally have thought so, but I won't judge before having read your argument).
And yes, once you have posted a new thread you would post here with the link so I can add it to the index.
First of all, I'm in charge of the Salamence analysis, which also contains the analysis of the Scarf + Moxie set, so you barely have rights to it. Second, this may be a bit subjective since this is based purely on one's experience, but this Salamence is just about one of the best sets it can offer, and revenge killing, rather than "sweeping", should come first-hand.
I think he meant "terrible" as in "terrifying" or some such alternative but more positive use of the word that is so unfortunately common these days... the sentence doesn't make any sense otherwise.
EDIT: And man this is actually really confusing, there's dragonne and there's dragonnite...
On another note, 900th post woo
Now start finishing those wave 1 analyses please, they are driving me insane
EDIT2: One other thing... if you change your name, and you are in the index somewhere, please do kindly inform me, so I can keep this thing from tracking users that don't exist any more. That also goes for the people who are in the archives.
EDIT3: Also after a twenty-minute check, the index is up to date