I saw
rssp1 asked me a question. I started typing up an answer at the time and then it got deleted lol. Well, idk... Celever clearly comes across as scummier, but has a stronger presence so that's kind of obvious. PGNXB subbing back in kinda screwed up my read on him, which was never really solid anyway. The only really clean scenario where Celever can be mafia is where he's partner with you, and in that case he's playing very, very, very, very recklessly. Unless he thought his lynch on you at the start of the day (when it would never be carried) was subtle. PGNXB could plausibly be mafia with you or UTO, and refuses to play his hand. It's extremely bold and aggressive play, which I wouldn't put past him, but it's sincere play. What I do not like about it is that it was slippery and evasive beforehand, but has suddenly become committal despite the lack of breathing room for it. I know Celever and I are different people, but compare it to me, for example: I played extremely aggressively on Day 2, got a mafia lynched, and now am reserving my judgment because it's LYLO.
Celever's play towards UTO has been consistent whereas his play towards you has been inconsistent, which I would consider positive for you both, but today is Day 3 and it is possible that Celever is simply taking refuge in audacity / has overestimated my willingness to lynch UTO and is now stuck committing to that playstyle (because anything else would give the game away, wouldn't it?)
I find it interesting that Celever is equally happy to lynch PGNXB and UTO, but cannot make a case on PGNXB (as I cannot) because PGNXB doesn't post much. (Part of this is just PGNXB naturally being afraid of getting things wrong, but it would suit a mafia PGNXB very well.) This makes sense from both a town and scum Celever. If Celever is scum with you then either of those lynches are achievable autowins. If Celever is town, PGNXB is confirmed scum to him and he apparently received some sort of divine transmission about UTO. (Who do you pray to, Celever? Can I convert?)
What I like about Celever's play is that he's not really trying to people-please like he was before. He's quit dodging my questions for the most part. Before he was playing obsequiously (and to his own admission, afraid of experienced, dominant players despite being experienced himself, which is why I suspected him of sucking up to UncleSam and trying to avoid my attention) and it reeked of mafia trying to find friends and mislynch. However, he knows that's why I was attacking him, so...
I find it odd that PGNXB is primarily interacting with acid, who is the Ice Mafia, and not the town. These would be very safe posts for a stealthy mafia to make, because everyone knows the object is scum already. The longer he goes without adding thoughts about UTO and rssp1, the scummier I have to consider him. I don't want him to just pick a side, I know he's afraid of getting the wrong one, so am I. I want him to explain his thoughts about each side and why he ultimately can't find anything scummy. I don't so much want conclusions so much as I want reasons, stream of consciousness, raw and honest thought dump. Celever is also refusing to provide this, but he answers when I ask, which is something. This is the exact same shit I called you out for, being unable to find anything noteworthy about DLE and UTO (from your PoV, both of these players are mafia).
Now I want to point out this post (
#901, btw I got #1000 in this thread LOL) by Celever.
U-Turn Out said:
sorry I didn't really read it indepth before posting. Mostly I feel that when Celever's post said "real doctor cc", it was implying that he wanted his partner, who was rssp1 to cc even though he knew he wasn't doctor; I think he knew that if we got organized we would probably win the game. I doubt he would do this with pokeguy since pokeguy has been acting antidoctor (dont know how else to put it) and would not ask the same thing otherwise.
This is an extremely salient point (with something very fascinating contained within btw, but we're discussing Celever/PGNXB) and to my knowledge (point me if I'm wrong), Celever has never refuted it. His response was:
I just don't believe that you're doc. You claimed in an incredibly scummy way.
which has not been articulated, which prevents me from providing my full thoughts on the doctor claims because I refuse to allow Celever to mimic me on a couple of things I want to say at a later date. Now I'm gonna be fair to Celever here, and it's possible Celever has actually explicitly said this and I forgot, in which case Celever can just say that and I'll apologise and whatever. It's possible that Celever meant the incredibly scummy way was offering to post their role details, which were publicly available in the signup thread which UTO claimed to not have read (one of Celever or UTO may have slipped though, because the generic villager PM doesn't contain the details from the signup thread. Actually both of them could've slipped and UTO is doctor and Celever is Fire Mafia and so they both know what power role PMs look like :p the only person we can trust in that situation is acidphoenix, and who knows if the PMs all follow a consistent format).
Here's the potential slip I'm referring to. I thought this point was fairly flimsy and since Celever continued to reiterate the scumminess of the claim I assumed they were separate. They may not have been. But if they were then why would Celever pursue that point against UTO so aggressively
Town should never be so certain. You yourself believe this, you eventually came to believe I was town in most reasonable scenarios, but you rightly said that without a cop and a flip nothing is confirmed. You've seen my logic process at work because I show my working when I post, you know that I don't jump to conclusions. I don't expect Celever to post essays like me, I expect him to post like he normally does (short and sweet, good post analysis, concise summary of ideas) and elaborate on anything important. And the #1 thing I have found suspicious this game is people who seem to be statically pushing agendas and not reacting to new information. Celever's swap from lynching you to refusing to believe UTO (especially after your exchange about doctor) screams that the first lynch was insincere or not intended to be carried and potentially a distancing move, which is how I have pondered it before.
jumpluff I'm town. I have no idea how you could possibly think that I'm partners with rssp1 given that I'm trying to lynch him. That would be pretty awful play.
Not if you're bluffing at the literal start of the day.
And it's weird because Celever was like 'rssp1 has been playing like a power role' when it's been established well in the UTO vs. rssp1 argument that rssp1 has been playing the opposite of TIK and UltrasPlot.
In this, PGNXB's natural hesitance (while wearing out its welcome) rings truer of a town thought process, but it's also very personally authentic and cannot be read purely as town (by which I mean PGNXB, if Fire Mafia, can't afford to commit to the wrong side -- if he sticks up for UTO it cements the rssp1/Celever vs. PokeguyNXB/UTO shit that's going on and risks him getting outed if they don't win today, if he sticks up for rssp1 could it be that he would lose his partner, UTO?). I have a feeling that if PGNXB and UTO are the Fire Mafia, they agreed to continue the pattern of play where UTO would play on the defensive as the voice of reason (because UTO's contributions have been mostly good, which is why I stuck up for him in the first place) and PGNXB/sunny would try to stay ambiguous, underestimated, and out of sight. In fact, mafia UTO pretending PGNXB is the doctor makes as much sense as town (and thus doctor) UTO pretending PGNXB is the doctor in this vein. But UTO clearly signalled that they knew the doctor at the start of the day, whether it was to shield PGNXB and UTO saw PGNXB wasn't going to catch on or because they were attempting to bait out PGNXB, we will see.
Finally we have the nightkills. I don't believe it was the doctor claimant
necessarily who wanted Yeti dead, and it may not have even been personal, because neither rssp1 or UTO had a reason to go after Yeti except for a safe town kill. I was right about the nightkills before, so let's run with it a little more. The Yeti kill demonstrated competence and a similar modus operandi to the ButteredToast kill (not giving much information because of lack of partnertells/consensus views, likely to hit around the doctor). Was there a possible motive for the ButteredToast kill now acid has stated twice the Spiffy kill was his and DLE's (which I fully believe), outside of this seemingly specific victim profiling (only two data points, etc.)? Not really IMO, BT never said anything. PGNXB doesn't care who dies. His hypothetical partner (probably UTO) does. The people they want dead most (other than US, who died at the hands of the Ice Mafia) survived the night.
Meanwhile Celever has reacted weirdly to the nightkills both times. DLE lied about the Spiffy kill, which I called out (and was proven right, etc. etc. I told you so), but we know that Celever isn't DLE's partner, so Celever can't be responsible for the Spiffy kill, which makes sense. In the same post he said:
If I had to say one kill target it'd be Walrein. He's generally thought of as town, especially yesterday, but at the same time he hadn't actually said much, and there were few very concrete reads. I guess ButteredToast fits under this too, but Walrein came to mind first.
I think this is a very plausible comment from someone who would kill Yeti, even though she had said plenty and had reads, because it's an essential admission, 'well, yeah, there's plenty of reason I would've done the ButteredToast kill'.
This time both of you came from the PoV of assuming the nightkills were dumb, which confounded me and struck me as an attempt to obfuscate what went down, because they were very Bad News for me but not very surprising. But then we had acid claim responsibility for the Spiffy and UncleSam kills (idk if I agree with the reasoning behind the US kill, but there's no reason to reject it, and the Spiffy kill was very clearly DLE's). Celever kept trying to argue acid probably killed Yeti. Why? Well, either because fsr he genuinely believed acid would lie about the kill (which was possible and why I requested reconfirmation), or because he knows who killed whom and knows his team killed Yeti and wanted to cover it up ... and if that's the case, his team is rssp1/Celever, in which case Yeti is an excellent kill for them, because I was town to null-reading rssp1 and UncleSam was vehemently defending rssp1, whereas Yeti was going after him. But Celever gains nothing from making this argument unless he genuinely believes it, so idk.
Admittedly the sentence was incoherent in the first place
Let's not forget that if we're to believe acid the Fire Mafia killed Yeti last night I think. This is definitely more likely to be acid.
but Celever kept backing it up with arguments about activity prodding so... I assume Celever was genuinely arguing what I've been refuting.
I'm not sure how much I believe it. I think that the real doc should cc.
Also I'd say that rssp1 and UTO is the likeliest. UTO and Pokeguy is possible in some way, but only if rssp1 is the true doc or something.
This might be a surprising conclusion for you, but I still think (including for reasons unstated) PokeguyNXB has a reasonable chance of being the Fire Mafia villager, but I have to go do that post separately basically and it's harder because there's less actual meat to pick at. I just can't commit to it and so my response to that is to articulate all the thoughts I have on Celever in the hopes someone might help my thinking along.
I'd finally like to note that DLE wanted to lynch Celever and UTO the most, and was deflecting suspicion onto me in what I see as primarily a defensive move (this game is 2v1 after all), I will need this point later and don't wanna forget it so yea. Some of this is undoubtedly out of date sorry but like this took mammoth effort from me :(