1. New to the forums? Check out our Mentorship Program!
    Our mentors will answer your questions and help you become a part of the community!
  2. Welcome to Smogon Forums! Please take a minute to read the rules.

Moving Forward (Re: "Putting My Foot Down")

Discussion in 'Blind Voting' started by Philip7086, Nov 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Snorlaxe

    Snorlaxe 2 kawaii 4 u
    is a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,230
    Group A

    i'll always support you, phil. you've done so much for me so at this point i believe that whatever you think would be best in the long-term point of view for competitive pokemon is truly the best thing to do.
  2. JabbaTheGriffin

    JabbaTheGriffin Stormblessed
    is a Tutor Alumnusis a Super Moderator Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,029
    i like the way you worded those. i was worried you'd word them like "yo phil you're my bro" and "yo dick get da fuck out and put someone better in charge"

    Group B

    i've always been anti-single leader. so this has nothing to do with you i have disagreed with "we need someone to b leader" since the beginning. we need someone to set up votes that's what we need. we're a community we should do things as a group there should be no one with the power to overrule a majority of policymakers that's just my opinion.
  3. Cyrrona

    Cyrrona starlet
    is a Tiering Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    186
    Abstain

    First, some general comments. This situation was obviously handled poorly, so here's some constructive criticism for the future. One of two things should have happened:

    1) Phil puts his foot down from the get-go and decides to adopt what he believes is healthiest for the community (100% adherence) without starting a poll at all.

    2) Phil honors the poll results he asked users for, or (at the very least) holds another poll with more clearly defined options after the drama started surfacing.

    Asking users to decide an issue and then vetoing what a supermajority arrives at because the leader personally disagrees is backwards and unprofessional. It’s only natural people would be angry about this kind of inconsistency. The Critical Hit topic wasn’t a reason to panic either, since the poll clearly showed the community doesn't support adopting radical changes like the ones proposed in that thread regardless of how “persuasive” some of the arguments might be. If anything, the discussion proved that common sense actually can govern when called upon. All that being said, I don’t think Phil is unqualified to lead. I’m confident he’ll be able to maneuver around sticky situations like this with ease after he’s had a little more time to settle into the role. It’s extremely difficult to run things, and we shouldn’t lose sight of that fact. Phil’s a respected battler and (though I may disagree with him on a number of policy issues) a pretty level-headed guy, and I genuinely believe he’s acting with the best of intentions. I may not approve of his recent decisions, but I do support him overall as a Generation 5 Policy leader.

    I am abstaining from this tally instead of aligning with Group B because I’m not entirely sure whether I want another poll created. Though I’m fundamentally opposed to the methods Phil used to arrive at it, letting the current decision stand might ultimately be the simplest solution now that we’ve seen all the commotion this has caused. I wish things had been done differently, but after watching PR these past few days, I’m not positive changing them now is the best course of action.
  4. Nachos

    Nachos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR1VtHOpEw8
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Tiering Contributoris a Tutor Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,515
  5. firecape

    firecape This is the end...
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,048
  6. Yllnath

    Yllnath

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    304
  7. Gouki

    Gouki nice times all the times
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnusis a Past SPL Winnerdefeated the Smogon Frontier

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,282
  8. Tleilax

    Tleilax

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Group A. A leader has to make decisions that might go against the majority. What's the point of having a leader figure if they can't slap us upside the head when we screw up?
  9. Jiggy

    Jiggy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    275
    Group A

    However, that doesn't mean I wouldn't like some kind of re-vote. I want the community to explicitly accept or reject an idea something like this: No element or mechanic of Pokemon is so sacred that it isn't worth debating and potentially changing, regardless of the length of time and the amount of energy those debates require.
  10. uraga

    uraga Walking the streets with you in your worn-out jeans
    is a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    952
    After some deliberation on this issue, I'm going to have to go with Group B. I originally supported your decision to 'put your foot down', because I feel that there is a reason that we have a leader for this whole process and that the leader should be vocal enough to decide on certain issues. Even though I strongly disagreed with your take on the philosophy of following in-game mechanics, I was willing to accept this decision on the basis of moving forward with Gen V.

    However, I have come to believe that this decision was wrong. Although I believe that the chief executive in the Gen V deciding process should reserve the right to make such decisions, I am not comfortable with a leader overturning a supermajority such as the one we had because of his own deeply-rooted ideological views. I feel that there should have been more behind the decision, be it majority's support or more sound logical conviction. As I mentioned before, I am strongly against those who say that modifying the cartridge mechanics in any ways will constitute a shift away from Pokemon into "Smogonmon", as the game is still the game if we make such a miniscule shift that does not change the fundamentals at all. With that said, your justification for ruling the way you did was nothing but a poorly supported (by the PR forum, not the reasoning) dissenting opinion. It's equivalent to the US President bringing a controversial law to Congress, seeing that a supermajority wants to pass it, and then being able to veto anyway. I'd like to think that there is a reason for this forum, and that we participants have a say in the issues that cannot be brushed aside like this.

    Again, I support a powerful leader as Gen V develops, but certainly not on cases like this where we have a clear consensus in one direction on an issue that is not as complex as it is being made out by some people to be. I generally would support an action like this, but this situation seems unacceptable to me and I agree wholeheartedly with Group B.
  11. Pride

    Pride

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    295
    Group B

    I would only like to add that while I believe you made the wrong decision here, that doesn't mean I would like to see you step down.
  12. Great Sage

    Great Sage

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    6,666
  13. apologies

    apologies
    is a Past SPL Winner

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    554
    Group B

    in general i think we should follow in-game mechanics but following ones that are unimportant (mainly classic sleep clause) is a bit dumb. the main reason i voted for group b is because i don't think you should have veto power. i know you'll generally make good decisions, but it isn't fair for him to be able to go against the majority of the community in my opinion.
  14. bugmaniacbob

    bugmaniacbob Floats like a Butterfree, stings like a Metapod
    is a Smogon Media Contributoris an Artist Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,293
    Group B

    I trust your judgement on these matters, especially when there is a deadlock. But I think that common sense rules that a supermajority verdict was significantly enough to show what we wanted. More than anything else, I'd like to see that when we actually, as a community, manage to make a decision, we don't just immediately backtrack because a minority disagrees. That's not going to work. As much as I'm an avid monarchist, and I will support whatever your final decision is on this, I have to vote which way I think is best for the community.
  15. iss

    iss happily ever after
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,093
    Group B
  16. reachzero

    reachzero the pastor of disaster
    is a Super Moderator Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,524
  17. hanke

    hanke
    won the 6th Official Smogon Tournament

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    664
    i want to abstain my vote

    well in my opinion i have no doubt philip is the best name to lead PR, (just see what he do to this community) but i can not agree with some changes like sleep clause, smogon's philosophy on competitive pokemon etc, those clauses are fine just the way they are.

    and yea of course will have some changes for 5th gen but this things are are involved in the mechanics of the game and gameplay

    seriously, Critical Hits (and other such sources of "hax") its ridiculous to be considered important to be discussed, ch's are on pkmn at the first gen and until now they wanna remove ch's just because they hates to lost to hax? then why exist secondary effect's lol

    just some of my opinions and yea i agree phil is the best the to lead PR but i can not agree with those changes that's why i want to abstain my vote :3
  18. LonelyNess

    LonelyNess PK FLASH
    is a Tournament Director Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,427
  19. Ditto

    Ditto /me huggles
    is a Tournament Directoris a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogonis a Community Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,020
    Group A.

    While I do not completely think that it should only be Philip7086 at the top, he is there so I will support him. I like his idea of the council or whatever. I am not sure if they were consulted at all on this event, if not I think they should be from now on.
  20. v

    v I'm on your six
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Site Staff Alumnusis a Super Moderator Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnus
    ULTRA Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,862
    Group A
  21. Megan_Fox

    Megan_Fox

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    928
    Group A

    While i voted the opposite, I still support this decision. As others have said, it was a mistake to have a public poll and then overrule it IMO, but its understandable. You're new to the role so a mistake isn't a big deal at all. Having a leader that doesn't conform to the crowd and tries to lead us in an ideal direction is exactly what we need.
  22. Ulevo

    Ulevo

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    492
  23. jrrrrrrr

    jrrrrrrr wubwubwub
    is a Tiering Contributoris a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    3,172
    Again with the two incredibly vague choices? You really don't get this, do you Phil?

    Group B, because we should be able to re-vote with Jackal's much more specific question.
  24. Aldaron

    Aldaron All da lil birdies chirpin
    is a Tournament Directoris a Battle Server Administratoris a Smogon IRC SOPis a Tiering Contributoris a Contributor to Smogonis an Administrator
    OU and IRC Leader

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,434
  25. RBG

    RBG But I keep cruising, can't stop, won't stop grooving.
    is a Smogon Social Media Contributoris a Super Moderatoris a Site Staff Alumnusis a Smogon IRC AOp Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
    Facebook Manager

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,348
    Group A
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)