That's all well and good, but I was under the impression that the standard convention is that we have a proposal, it is then discussed in depth to evaluate both sides of the argument, and then a vote is held after the discussion has come to a reasonable eqillibrium so that people have had a chance to read up on the issue and think about it in depth. This is not a proposal, it is a poll, and it is presented in a blatantly misleading fashion. Such an important matter should not be left to something so hasty and I strongly believe the results of this poll are significantly affected by the presentation of the information in the OP. If you are so convinced level 50 is genuinely superior, why are you opposed to a impartially presented re-poll? Like I said, it would be important to have things looked over by both sides to ensure the new OP was an impartial as possible. If that skews things away from level 50 voting then clearly my point that voting is affected by the bias present in the OP must be true. If it does not, the vote will play out and the option smogon truly believes is the best, having considered all the facts, will be the winner.The OP is a proposal. It is trying to make a case as to why we should change from what we are doing. It is trying to argue one side. Of course it seems biased to you if you disagree. But it is not trying to deceive people. Everything it says in the OP is a fact. If people choose not to inform themselves before voting that is no one's fault but their own. Besides, if you actually think the majority of the people even read the OP, you are kidding yourself. Polls like these are frankly worthless as the majority of people make reactionary votes without actually thinking about anything. This is really a debate of what philosophy we should follow, but people vote based on what meta they think they would like more, completely ignoring the actual intent of the poll.