I am so glad I didn't make that trade although Thomas fucked me over somewhat anyways.fuckin budaj...
I am so glad I didn't make that trade although Thomas fucked me over somewhat anyways.fuckin budaj...
Why is Bertuzzi such a major acquisition? He's been a shell of his former self since the Moore incident, he's only been shuttled to 4 teams since then.Calgary was one of the teams who had some major acquisitions this year (with Cammalleri and Bertuzzi)
I just believe that Calgary is a place where he can regain that offensive touch he once had in Vancouver, but that's just my opinion. Also Bertuzzi played minimal time on the teams he's been traded to (except Anahiem), so it's hard to judge him based on that.Why is Bertuzzi such a major acquisition? He's been a shell of his former self since the Moore incident, he's only been shuttled to 4 teams since then.
As long as he doesn't bad mouth the Thrashers, we're cool. ;)you're arguing with a canucks fan don't bother lol
Get the Center ice package, its worth it.On another note, I really wish I could see the Atlanta vs. Washington game. There are also some pretty tight matchups (i.e. Chicago vs. NYR, Columbus vs. Dallas).
That last goal was pretty fucking bad though ;/ fucking theodore is it too late to get kolzig back ?_? Not that I'm defending the rest of the team's defense so far...i have to go soon but posting to inform everyone of two important tidbits
nhl gamecenter is finally free, from today to the 15th SO YOU CAN WATCH WASHINTON FOR 3 GAMES NOW
and maxim afinogenov started with kotalik and mair not vanek and roy I was wrong DM =( looks like they were just showing him off for tradebait
picked up ray whitney and dropped maxim with that news
EDIT: also feel bad for theodore two goals he couldn't do anything against...CAPS need to tighten up this is reminding me of early last year :(
The people shitting on Vancouver's secondary scoring don't know what they're talking about, evidently. The Canucks have 3 lines that can score in different ways with the Sedins/Bernier line that can control the puck on the cycle, the Demitra/Raymond/Pyatt line that can burn teams with their speed, and the Kesler/Burrows/Hansen line that can check other team's top lines tenaciously while getting lots of chances on the counter-attack.But with a score of 6-0? Calgary was one of the teams who had some major acquisitions this year (with Cammalleri and Bertuzzi), whereas Vancouver was getting shit on about how they don't have reliable secondary scoring. I also though Kippy would play decently, but 6 goals on 23 shots just doesn't cut it.
!you're arguing with a canucks fan don't bother lol
Both good changes, stuff that "makes sense" that I'm kind of surprised it took this long to change...1) A PP automaticly now starts with a face-off next to the penalised team's goalie.
2) There cannot be commercial breaks after an icing call anymore. No line-change for the team called for icing and now no break.
It just stopped in whatever zone it was touched up in before(so most teams just took it across center ice and dumped it), mainly penalizes teams more for penalties taken in the offensive zone or when in possession of the puck.It wasn't already like this? I thought that was the rule.
Not completely. Depending on where it was touched it makes a difference. For example, if it was touched up in the offensive zone(for the team that is getting called) the faceoff will be outside of the offensive zone.It just stopped in whatever zone it was touched up in before(so most teams just took it across center ice and dumped it), mainly penalizes teams more for penalties taken in the offensive zone or when in possession of the puck.
Well, Gerber blew the game...again. Auld Auld Auld Auld?Well, the Canadiens slaughtered Toronto 6-1, ole ole ole ole?
except this should all be in past tense because thats not the rule nowNot completely. Depending on where it was touched it makes a difference. For example, if it was touched up in the offensive zone(for the team that is getting called) the faceoff will be outside of the offensive zone.
I didn't think he was that bad really, the last one was kinda weak but it was deflected and it's not like he didn't stop quite a few shots that had a decent shot of going in... I'd be more a little more worried about the 41 shots than the 3 goals I think! Although honestly with the officiating in that game I'm not sure how much you can draw from it either way...Stall said:Well, Gerber blew the game...again. Auld Auld Auld Auld?
Back-to-back games for them, goalies rarely get both starts.Dumb question as a new hockey "fan" (Rangers)
Why didnt Lunqvist play today ??