Close enough.Why am I feeling a 13-10 win for the Lions
Except when you're the Giants.The Patriots are gonna drop 60 on the Cowpoke
All these years and people stil haven't learned about what happens when you call out Tommy boy.
That line about the Duplo hahahaThe Giants sole purpose for existing is to appear every 4th calendar year to prevent the Patriots from winning another Superbowl and make it look like someone can actually challenge them.
Then they fade back into irrelevancy for 3 years while Eli builds the new Lego set his father got him for winning the big game.
And i'm talking about the Duplo kind of Legos not the normal ones.
Still better than Josh Johnson starting so I'm okay with this. I'm just really worried that Andrew Luck is gonna become a "Colin Kaepernick". By that I mean, shines in his first few seasons then flounders later on. I still think it's too early for that label but I'm starting to get nervous that'll be the case. Anyway, the Colts are doing the right thing in waiting for Luck to be 100% so he can play against the Pats next week. This is not gonna be an impressive game for the Colts at Houston but it's a winnable game even with Luck out. Patriots are not a winnable game without Luck. You could make a valid case for it not being winnable either way but they would need their offense to be 100% if they want to win or even come close. Without Luck, that's not the case. But what scares me most is that we're 2-2 in the easiest part of our schedule. We have games against New England, Carolina, Denver, Atlanta, and Pittsburgh still left. If we lost to the fucking Bills and Jets, and barely beat the Titans and Jaguars, how the hell are we gonna win those tough games?Hasslebeck is starting today despite the fact that he hasn't practiced all week due to being sick.
Sorce: http://deadspin.com/the-colts-are-an-absolute-mess-at-quarterback-1735414973
this made me smile.Still better than Josh Johnson starting so I'm okay with this. I'm just really worried that Andrew Luck is gonna become a "Colin Kaepernick". By that I mean, shines in his first few seasons then flounders later on. I still think it's too early for that label but I'm starting to get nervous that'll be the case. Anyway, the Colts are doing the right thing in waiting for Luck to be 100% so he can play against the Pats next week. This is not gonna be an impressive game for the Colts at Houston but it's a winnable game even with Luck out. Patriots are not a winnable game without Luck. You could make a valid case for it not being winnable either way but they would need their offense to be 100% if they want to win or even come close. Without Luck, that's not the case. But what scares me most is that we're 2-2 in the easiest part of our schedule. We have games against New England, Carolina, Denver, Atlanta, and Pittsburgh still left. If we lost to the fucking Bills and Jets, and barely beat the Titans and Jaguars, how the hell are we gonna win those tough games?
If he's still alive, you can't tell by the way he's playingNext week we'll learn that Andrew luck actually died
It's not being overcautious. It's called being smart and letting your star QB rest up for an extremely hard game where you'll need him to be 100%. The Colts can go to Houston and win with Hasselbeck. They can't play the Patriots ,home or not, and win with Hasselbeck.The AFC South is god awful, but someone has to win it and that team will be represented in the playoffs. The Clots know even if they make it, they're not going anywhere considering how flawed they are in the trenches on both sides and secondary (sans Davis). So if you thought Indy felt pressure to make the playoffs this year, you wouldn't know it. Luck could prolly go tonight, but they're being overcautious
I'm not sure you got my point. Let me phrase it again,They can't play the Patriots and win regardless of whom they start at QB
If they want it to be even a decent game than they need Luck. History goes against the Colts but it's a new season. Upsets happen. But they don't happen with Matt Hasselbeck.Anyway, the Colts are doing the right thing in waiting for Luck to be 100% so he can play against the Pats next week. This is not gonna be an impressive game for the Colts at Houston but it's a winnable game even with Luck out. Patriots are not a winnable game without Luck. YOU COULD MAKE A VALID CASE FOR IT NOT BEING WINNABLE EITHER WAY BUT THEY WOULD NEED THEIR OFFENSE TO BE 100% IF THEY WANT TO WIN OR EVEN COME CLOSE. Without Luck, that's not the case.
Is it worth it to sacrifice potentially losing one game over the comparatively minimal chance luck would not be 100% in a game he's sure to lose? Honestly, their chances of beating the Texans drop more than their chances of beating the Patriots rise.I'm not sure you got my point. Let me phrase it again,
All of the Patriots' running backs are worse than Arian Foster. We stuffed him last night holding him under 100 yards and scorelessI'm just excited to see which Patriots back will go for 200 and 4 TDs this time around
Arian Foster was clearly not 100%, it was kind of painful to watch...All of the Patriots' running backs are worse than Arian Foster. We stuffed him last night holding him under 100 yards and scoreless
And Lagarrette blount was much worse than a banged up arian foster.All of the Patriots' running backs are worse than Arian Foster. We stuffed him last night holding him under 100 yards and scoreless