• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Ninetales (Gen 4, full revamp)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys leave it alone... althought J7r, all HeYsUp is trying to say is that usage statistics don't always determine what is best on the set. I'll give you an example: When I was doing the Dragonite and Gliscor analysis I came accross this problem. Over 60% of Gliscor were running NO speed EVs, even though we all know that is dumb as shit. Does that mean the main Gliscor set needs to have no speed EVs? No, it just means that the community is largely misinformed perhaps because the analysis was not up to date. In Dragonite's case, over 50% of Dragonite when I did that analysis were the Jolly-natured Outrage, Earthquake, Fire Punch, Dragon Dance Dragonite that was completely outclassed by Salamence, thus making it not competitive. Yet, it was still used by an overwhelming majority of the community largely because the analysis was outdated. In just a two or so months, both problems corrected themselves.

EDIT: Caelum beat me to it. Yeah, what Caelum said.
 
Obviously, Ninetales users think that Hypnosis is more effective. I never said that stats should be the sole driving force behind putting things there, its just that the stats are so overwhelmingly tilted against HP Rock that you can't really ignore them. HP Rock looks good on paper, but for some reason that nobody is caring to explain, it is not used competitively.

The same argument can be said about Electivire and the physical set; the Special based mixed one is more effective yet used less. From what I have seen, HP Rock would be more beneficial, as the Fire types such as Arcanine are common switch ins. Hypnosis's drop in accuracy seems to be too hit and miss, in my opinion, to be the only viable option other than Substitute.
 
The thing that separates Ninetales with other sweepers is having access to a sleep inducing move and a +2 boosting move. In my revamp I'm working on on my Microsoft Word i have both HP Rock / Hypnosis slashed in. Hypnosis still gets a mention despite the 60% accuracy.
 
Guys leave it alone... althought J7r, all HeYsUp is trying to say is that usage statistics don't always determine what is best on the set. I'll give you an example: When I was doing the Dragonite and Gliscor analysis I came accross this problem. Over 60% of Gliscor were running NO speed EVs, even though we all know that is dumb as shit. Does that mean the main Gliscor set needs to have no speed EVs? No, it just means that the community is largely misinformed perhaps because the analysis was not up to date. In Dragonite's case, over 50% of Dragonite when I did that analysis were the Jolly-natured Outrage, Earthquake, Fire Punch, Dragon Dance Dragonite that was completely outclassed by Salamence, thus making it not competitive. Yet, it was still used by an overwhelming majority of the community largely because the analysis was outdated. In just a two or so months, both problems corrected themselves.

1) gliscor has never *needed* speed evs since lucario only ran ice punch for a very short time.
2) DDDragonite may be outclassed by Salamence, but that doesn't mean that the set is not competitive. As I've explained countless times on this forum, if DDNite can perform at an OU level, it deserves to be mentioned. I also support some of Blaziken and Infernape's sets overlapping, etc. I'm not being inconsistent or illogical here.
3) rest of my response is down there v

The same argument can be said about Electivire and the physical set; the Special based mixed one is more effective yet used less. From what I have seen, HP Rock would be more beneficial, as the Fire types such as Arcanine are common switch ins. Hypnosis's drop in accuracy seems to be too hit and miss, in my opinion, to be the only viable option other than Substitute.

Special vs Physical Electivire really isn't relevant since both of them are still seriously outclassed. Its not like Mixed electivire is so much better than physical Evire that it makes a difference in terms of movesets. Even then, moves like Flamethrower and Tbolt are STILL used on about 1/4 of Evires. HP Rock is barely used on 1/10 of Ninetales, so obviously SOMETHING is happening that makes Hypnosis a much more appealing option to a huge majority of players. To me, a free nasty plot is much more worth it than hitting Mantine (who isnt used) and Moltres (who loses to SR, Hypnosis or NP) when you could just sleep them, and when you have other moves that can do it already. Hypnosis helps Ninetales support the team as well as allowing it to get that free boost. Hypnosis has been 60% for three generations yet it was always a very common move...why do people suddenly think it sucks? 10% is not that much of a difference =\

I agree that Sub doesnt belong there, I already said that I was just using it to illustrate why theorymonning sets out doesnt work. Hypnosis, as heysup has been helping me illustrate, is really the only reason to use Ninetales over Houndoom. Why would you not take advantage of that? If HP Rock was as revolutionary as you guys are saying, wouldnt more than 11% of people use it? Wouldn't Ninetales be used more too if that were the case?

I don't really think my position here is that out of the ordinary, the moves that get used more should be given precedence over moves that are not used. You guys can sit here and theorymon about type coverage all you want, but the fact still remains that at this point in time, 9 out of 10 Ninetales users do not see HP Rock as a competitive option for that last moveslot. HP Rock is not common, and it should not be portrayed as such. Nobody has explained why we shouldn't represent reality in the analysis.

I personally use analyses more from a defensive standpoint. If a ninetales comes out, I'm going to want to know what people are actually likely to use on it so I know how to prepare myself. Preparing for HP rock is useful, but you are more likely to be hit with Hypnosis. It would be a complete disservice to not mention what moves are actually used on the pokemon in question, whether or not they are the best on paper. THAT is my point...does anybody actually disagree with what I'm saying?

(just so i dont have to repeat myself, hypnosis/hp rock is what i would put as the last option and I dont care that it only has 60% accuracy. Ninetales isn't frail and it is faster than almost everything in UU, including all of its counters. Hypnosis is going to hit much more often than it misses.)
 
So j7r, are you suggesting that the analyses for every single Pokemon get updated every month based on the monthly statistics to account for the common trends? It seems that you must be if you're sticking to the policy you've outlined above, though I don't recall that ever being done before or even if it's feasible.
 
Isn't the whole point of this updating process to keep the analyses up to date? Wasn't the whole point of the first AW cleaning project done by myself, Aldaron and BK to keep them up to date? Why would we NOT strive to have the best, most accurate analyses possible? If something serious changes from month to month, it should be updated asap to reflect the changes in the metagame. If an analysis doesn't reflect what people are actually using, what point is there to even having the analysis?

From Aldaron's post in the "Past Analyses, New Analyses" thread stickied on this forum:

Smogon is the premier competitive Pokemon site and resource.

As such, a constant effort to always improve the main source of its competitive knowledge, the Pokemon Analyses and the Pokemon Articles, is absolutely necessary.

Through the various efforts of our contributors, we have Pokemon analyses that are constantly updated with metagame relevant sets. This accomplishment is no small feat and should be appreciated accordingly. However, I firmly believe that if we can improve something, we should.
So, yes. I am suggesting that we do everything we can to keep the analyses as up-to-date as possible. Why wouldn't we?
 
Updated:
-Added the bottom section and Team Options
-Added Hidden Power Rock suggested by others
-Revamped with help from Cosmic

Feel free to make suggestions..
 
I think the Life Orb set is done, lol, but I was wondering what other people thought about RL's suggestion for the Specs set:

[SET]
name: Choice Specs
move 1: Overheat / Fire Blast
move 2: Hidden Power Rock
move 3: Energy Ball
move 4: Flamethrower / Hypnosis
item: Choice Specs
nature: Timid
evs: 252 SpA / 4 SpD / 252 Speed

I don't really see the need for Extrasensory. Its really only for like...Hariyama and Muk lol. I kind of like RL's set more, but I havent used choice Ninetales so I wonder if someone else had an opinion there too >_>

Also, can scarf be slashed on it there and just rename it "Choice"? idk if Scarf Ninetales has the SpAtk to be effective but that seems to be the general trend in analyses.
 
I tested Extra Sensory and it's pretty much filler. Hariyama is still a sight for sore eyes to Ninetales and it is required to hit Hariyama and still hurt Flash Fire users neutrally. With Flamethrower + Overheat / Fire Blast it won't give you that much coverage. I might consider slashing in Hypnosis on the choice set.
 
I think the consensus was to make the LO set look like

this..

move 1: Nasty Plot
move 2: Fire Blast / Flamethrower
move 3: Energy Ball
move 4: Hidden Power Rock / Hypnosis

Firstly, Fire Blast has better damage per attack, even when factoring in misses, not to mention it gets important KOes. Flamethrower should be a secondary option for accuracy loving people. Its also VERY contradictory to have Flamethrower on for accuracy, when Hypnosis is suggested later on....

Secondly, I think we argued enough that Hidden Power Rock was more viable because of the perfect coverage, and being the more reliable option, when Hypnosis is a secondary option due to its bad accuracy.

Its not so much the order, but how the analysis portrays it, mainly the contractiction, when it says something to the effect of "flamethrower is more accurate", and Hypnosis is there. It also says you can more reliably get off a Nasty Plot with Hypnosis, but thats 60% chance...thats not more reliable at all.

I just want to get this right >_<.

As for the Specs set, just mention Extrasensory in SC over Hypnosis/FF because Hariyama walls it otherwise.
 
I still think Hypnosis needs to be #1 option and strongly mentioned because it is something that separates Ninetales from other Fire-types. Hypnosis+ Nasty Plot is the basic synergy is has and it should be mentioned first. I might consider changing the order of Flamethrower / Fire Blast to Fire Blast / Flamethrower because like I stated it has a chance to miss a OHKO.
 
Thats like saying you should use Heal bell on a DD Dragonite set, because its different.

The fact that Fire / Grass / Rock have perfect coverage (much better SE coverage than Doom), and its faster, and has high SDef is what differentiates it.

Just because a move is different, doesnt mean its automatically better. With the lowering of Hypnosis' accuracy, its pretty much impossible to use as effectively for most Pokemon.


@ Jrrr for the specs set.

Ninetales has too shitty SpA to pull it off.
 
Why would we not use the order of what people actually use to decide? The main option for more people is flamethrower and hypnosis first...but it really doesn't matter. Why change it to something that people don't use? Its not like adding Heal Bell to DDNite, Hypnosis is a completely viable move to use on this Ninetales. Without it, you are relying on your opponent switching to get an NP. You see Hypnosis' accuracy as making it unreliable, I see "praying for your opponent to switch" as being more unreliable. Oh no, they decided to sacrifice Registeel instead of switching out...now I have a dead Ninetales that didn't do anything for my team.

I have personally used FT Ninetales because having multiple moves with shit accuracy is usually a no-no. If Fire Blast actually gets KOs that FT doesnt, then make that the main option and explain why. Hypnosis being dismissed is retarded, especially if you choose to replace it with a move that nobody uses.

And yeah, I thought that's what would happen with the specs/scarf set. It was just a thought.
 
Thats like saying you should use Heal bell on a DD Dragonite set, because its different.

Nasty Plot + Hypnosis is effective and gives Ninetales a reason to use other than other Fire-types. Hypnosis gets first mention because it has the edge over all the Fire-types in UU that don't have acess to it. Heal Bell on Dragonite is different situation than Nasty Plot + Hypnosis
 
Why would we not use the order of what people actually use to decide?

I just picked some random quote to respond to, I skimmed everything.

Analyses are not an archive of what is popular. They do not exist to be "up to date" with what people are currently using. Analyses are supposed to list the most competitively viable sets in the current metagame.

What is on a Smogon analysis has a significant effect on the metagame. There are countless examples of this statistically. They are not a "chronicle", they are a force. Thus it's the writer's duty to list the most competitively viable sets to be as helpful as possible to the community.

Statistics are not evidence of what is good. You yourself have argued this countless times in PR in opposition to usage based declarations of Uber and OU. People are retarded, so they will use what's on an analysis. Which can sometimes suck ass in the current metagame. So by going by the order of what people use, you're effectively in a vicious cycle locking us in to analysis changes from months ago.

If everyone and their mother used stupid bullshit like Outrage (insert favorite non-dragon type here), would you really put it on an analysis?
 
I agree for the most part chris, but people were advocating taking hypnosis out for a move that literally nobody uses. My problem came because people were advocating removing FT and Hypnosis, even though they are clearly more likely to be on a Ninetales moveset, without actually giving a reason as to why. I was just wondering why "what people actually use" shouldnt be considered.

Now that someone finally showed that FB can get a KO that FT cant, I don't care about that moveslot, although FT is still definitely an option. I just picked FT out because it lets you beat Moltres, while Fire Blasts can be stalled out. I'm trying to just get people to use more common sense and actual battling situations when making analyses and edits, instead of theorymonning things out like other edits sometimes do.

While stats might not be the indication of what's good, they can certainly be used to describe what is bad.

Hypnosis is a completely viable move, it deserves to be where it is. Hidden Power Rock is a nice move to have for type coverage, but as we've seen with Electivire, type coverage isn't everything. If this is the case, the argument for HP Rock immediately becomes weakened. HP Rock isn't mandatory for this set to sweep, while Hypnosis guarantees a Nasty Plot. It is just more likely to benefit you than HP Rock is. Even from a theorymon perspective I dont see what you guys are arguing about. More teams would prefer the reliable sleep, since there arent many pokemon in UU that even have access to a sleep move.

Analyses are not an archive of what is popular. They do not exist to be "up to date" with what people are currently using. Analyses are supposed to list the most competitively viable sets in the current metagame.

If everyone and their mother used stupid bullshit like Outrage (insert favorite non-dragon type here), would you really put it on an analysis?

Why should the analyses not be up to date with what people are using? If people suddenly shift to something, chances are that its because it has a competitive advantage.

And yes, if everyone and their mother used Outrage Gyarados or Tyranitar for a reasonable amount of time, that would indicate that they have competitive value. Whether or not they actually have competitive value is a different argument though, since Hypnosis and FT are both viable on this Ninetales set. I really doubt that people are suddenly going to flood to HP Rock ninetales because of this edit (unless someone who disagreed with me did it on purpose, which I really wouldn't doubt =\). It would likely increase, but by 40% (to where Hypnosis currently is)? I doubt it. This is a dumb argument either way.

Does anybody actually disagree with me? People are saying "hp rock type coverage! omg!!!" and nobody except chris has even remotely expressed an issue with my opinion that the analyses are just as valuable for defensive purposes, and should reflect what people are actually using..
 
I agree that Hypnosis is viable on Ninetales, I was mostly arguing about principle. Why wouldn't someone want to include Hypnosis?
 
I agree that Hypnosis is viable on Ninetales, I was mostly arguing about principle. Why wouldn't someone want to include Hypnosis?

I think HeysUp wanted it to be "slashed" second. He didnt say he didn't want to include it.
 
Oh. The order of the slashes has nothing to do with viability, what's the big deal then?
 
Nasty Plot + Hypnosis is effective and gives Ninetales a reason to use other than other Fire-types. Hypnosis gets first mention because it has the edge over all the Fire-types in UU that don't have acess to it. Heal Bell on Dragonite is different situation than Nasty Plot + Hypnosis

How many other Special Fire-types can boast that awesome coverage or Speed? None. Thats the point.

You are now giving up what makes Ninetales worth using for a move that will help you maybe 60% of the time, but it lowers your sweeping chances.

In the analysis regarding hypnosis you are implying that you should risk Hypnosis to get a Nasty Plot, which is terribly wrong. Ninetales should be played as such:

Send ninetales into resisted / fire attack.
Use Nasty Plot.
If something walls you, use Hypnosis if you can afford to live through an attack, otherwise switch out.

Now with HP rock you dont run into that problem, except for vs Chansey.
 
heysup do you think Hypnosis is worth using or not? For some reason you are still ranting about how much better hp rock is despite the fact that nobody uses it, and about how shitty Hypnosis is (even though it is clearly not a bad move in uu) but you aren't taking the next step and proposing a change. Youre just arguing for the sake of arguing and it is dragging this entire thread down. Do you want hypnosis/hp rock as the option there like everyone else does or just hp rock? I know how much you want the last word to gain some personal victory, so can you please just suggest a change if you think something needs to be added so that we can get on with this thread? Otherwise, why are you still persisting with this retarded argument that you agree with me on :(

You are also seriously underestimating hypnosis, that disappoints me =\. With 100 base speed and stellar special defense, 9tails makes a decent user of the move tbqh...especially when you consider that a free NP is much better than just praying that they switch =\
 
How many other Special Fire-types can boast that awesome coverage or Speed? None. Thats the point.

Houndoom?

Why are you arguing on and on and on about the order of the slashes on a set, something a moderator has told you IN THIS THREAD doesn't matter at all?
 
Thank you for considering my changes Franky.

I just wanted to say that the way you mention Arcanine with Blaziken and Hariyama in the Choice Specs set makes it seem like you should use Extrasensory against it instead of HP Rock, and that perhaps it should be omitted.
 
Thank you for considering my changes Franky.

I just wanted to say that the way you mention Arcanine with Blaziken and Hariyama in the Choice Specs set makes it seem like you should use Extrasensory against it instead of HP Rock, and that perhaps it should be omitted.

No problem, at one point I had something written down but just decided to use some of your because it was written better. I put my own input also but yeah thanks for that catch removed Arcanine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top