np: OU Suspect Testing Round 1 - ...wait, I'm not Jumpman16!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is my line of thinking based off of what you're saying:
[Link to serebii with all Sand Veil users: http://www.serebii.net/abilitydex/sandveil.shtml]
[Link to serebii with all Snow Cloak users http://www.serebii.net/abilitydex/snowcloak.shtml]

Garchomp, Sandslah, and Cacturne (excluding NFE's) all have sand veil as their only non-DW ability in 5th gen. In sand, these pokes would be be violating the heart of the Evasion Clause, not the letter. If we are going to look at Garchomp and ban it because of its sand veil ability, what of Sandslash and Cacturne? While I agree their respective movepool, base stats, and typing would make them inferior to Garchomp, we cannot ban Garchomp on grounds of the Evasion Clause with its Sand Veil ability if we do not also ban Sandslash and Cacturne respectively.

For Snow Cloak, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear all have only Snow Cloak as their ability, again non-DW. If the community decides to ban the Snow Cloak ability for violation of the Evasion Clause, then the community is also effectively banning Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear because they lack secondary abilities.

If the community were to decided to ban just the Sand Veil / SnowCloak ability because of the Evasion Clause, then that is the same thing as banning Garchomp, Sandslash, Cacturne, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear, bar DW abilities, because they lack secondary abilities.

However, the community may decide to change the nature of the evasion clause for the 5th gen, or add/subtract to/from it. In this case, my argument may be in vain.

The big question, is an evasion-boosting ability broken enough that the community decides to ban it or not? Does the fact that these abilities require weather affect the effectiveness of these abilities? Will we see a upsurging of Cloud Nine bearers (Golduck or Altaria/Likcylicky in DW) in order to counter the potential threat from evasion-boosting weather mons?

If Garchomp gets re-classified as ubers and not Sandslash, Cacturne, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear, then it is not because of his ability to dodge opponents attacks in the sand, it is something much more.

He's not saying that they are broken, just like evasion may not necesarily be broken. they are simply haxy beyond what the community is willing to tolerate. Last gen we had to, since they had no alternative abilities. Now they do, and we can ban the abilties without banning the pokemon.
 
Anyone else tried Wobb + Hyper Offense yet?? It is ridiculously easy to pull off, I would have won quite a few matches now if it weren't for the server disconnecting. Right now, I'm putting Dual Screens into the equation as well, so it's pretty much Lead + Wobb + Bronzong + 3 setup sweepers. Even without the "hey one turn = autowin" like a lot of Ubers can pull off, you still have great setup sweepers like DD Mence, RP/SD Terakion and other stuff. Oh, Shell Break works pretty well too.
 
Anyone else tried Wobb + Hyper Offense yet?? It is ridiculously easy to pull off, I would have won quite a few matches now if it weren't for the server disconnecting. Right now, I'm putting Dual Screens into the equation as well, so it's pretty much Lead + Wobb + Bronzong + 3 setup sweepers. Even without the "hey one turn = autowin" like a lot of Ubers can pull off, you still have great setup sweepers like DD Mence, RP/SD Terakion and other stuff. Oh, Shell Break works pretty well too.

Yeah, its even harder to beat, when you throw weather into the mix. I have found though that it leaves you weak to weather, because of the lack of resistances, and revenge killer. One of my most successful teams was Politoed+Wobbuffet+Kingdra+Manaphy+Deoxys-S+Darkrai that utilized that strategy. Wobbuffet was almost the star of the team since it let Manaphy and Darkrai set up for free.
 
@gabe
i didn't say my team wasn't running a dragon counter, my garchomp isn't really my dragon counter, i have someone else for it.
Cresslia is a problem but i don't see them very often so it isn't a threat
Abomasnow can always OHKO with blizzard even with yache, it doesn't truly register as a threat since i would never pull him out without him being handled.
 
This is an interesting point that I've been meaning to make myself, but haven't found the right spot to do it. I believe that, currently, Garchomp is the only pokemon with an "evasion ability" who does not have a second option it can use at the moment. I would propose that if/when everything with Sand Veil/Snow Cloak is released with an alternate ability, we actually do take a long, hard look at banning these abilities themselves under the evasion clause.

Accupressure is a much different case from Inconsistent and is not nearly as broken because you cannot just sit there using stalling moves while you get a random boost every turn. You have to actively use the move, leaving you open to anything your opponent wants to hit you with.
Sand Veil and Snow Cloak raise it by a set amount (1 stage). This cannot be increased. The reason that Double Team/Minimize/Inconsistent are different is because you can boost yourself up to +6.

Suppose that Swords Dance Scizor could only boost to +1. It's not going to sweep a good team. The only way it'll sweep is if you let it get up to +6. In the same way, when Evasion cannot go beyond +1, you really won't be avoiding that much. +1 simply isn't a large enough boost to make it broken.

And we all know why Acupressure is different.......



Thunder is great as well, but Dragonite needs Dragon Pulse for STAB.
Considering that you'll mostly be spamming Surf and Hurricane/Gale/whatever-it's-called, Dragon Pulse will really only be used for coverage. So Dragonite doesn't necessarily need STAB on a coverage move.

But Dragon Pulse has more power than Thunder anyway, I was just saying that it can abuse rain even further....
 
Okay, guys, we really have to stop talking about banning inconsistent. When you talk about banning that, that's like saying we should ban hax, which is just ridiculous. We've come to accept that hax is just part of the game, so just deal with it. Yeah, it's annoying, but that's part of pokemon. And clefable walls octillery all day anyways, as I mentioned earlier, so it's not like it's completely broken.
 
Okay, guys, we really have to stop talking about banning inconsistent. When you talk about banning that, that's like saying we should ban hax, which is just ridiculous. We've come to accept that hax is just part of the game, so just deal with it. Yeah, it's annoying, but that's part of pokemon. And clefable walls octillery all day anyways, as I mentioned earlier, so it's not like it's completely broken.

I want it banned, but I can deal with it if it's not banned.

The reason is that up until now, hax would occur because you'd get a lucky freeze, or your Fire Blast would burn, or your Surf would crit. But now there is luck every single turn. You get "hax" by using Protect.

The difference between hax and Inconsistent is that hax is normally when you get a lucky break. Not when something good happens by default. This is sort of like if Thunderbolt would paralyze every time it hit. That's not paralysis hax, it's mayhem.
 
Unfortunately for me I'll probably only be able to l=play a little today and tomorrow. Work and all that. I probably won't be back stateside for another 2 1/2 years. I'll have B/W when it comes out but I'm gonna miss out on a lot of this Gen's metagame :(
 
Here is my line of thinking based off of what you're saying:
[Link to serebii with all Sand Veil users: http://www.serebii.net/abilitydex/sandveil.shtml]
[Link to serebii with all Snow Cloak users http://www.serebii.net/abilitydex/snowcloak.shtml]

Garchomp, Sandslah, and Cacturne (excluding NFE's) all have Sand Veil as their only non-DW ability in 5th gen. In sand, these pokes would be be violating the heart of the Evasion Clause. If we are going to look at Garchomp and ban it because of its Sand Veil ability, what of Sandslash and Cacturne? While I agree their respective movepool, base stats, and typing would make them inferior to Garchomp, we cannot ban Garchomp on grounds of the Evasion Clause with its Sand Veil ability if we do not also ban Sandslash and Cacturne respectively.

For Snow Cloak, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear all have only Snow Cloak as their ability, again non-DW. If the community decides to ban the Snow Cloak ability for violation of the Evasion Clause, then the community is also effectively banning Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear because they lack secondary abilities.

If the community were to decided to ban just the Sand Veil / SnowCloak ability because of the Evasion Clause, then that is the same thing as banning Garchomp, Sandslash, Cacturne, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear, bar DW abilities, because they lack secondary abilities.

However, the community may decide to change the nature of the evasion clause for the 5th gen, or add/subtract to/from it. In this case, my argument may be in vain.

The big question, is an evasion-boosting ability broken enough that the community decides to ban it or not? Does the fact that these abilities require weather affect the effectiveness of these abilities? Will we see a upsurging of Cloud Nine bearers (Golduck or Altaria/Likcylicky in DW) in order to counter the potential threat from evasion-boosting weather mons?

If Garchomp gets re-classified as ubers and not Sandslash, Cacturne, Glaceon, Froslass, and Tsunbear, then it is not because of his ability to dodge opponents attacks in the sand, it is something much more.
I think you're missing my point. I would not support banning any pokemon outright just because of its ability, be it Garchomp or Cacnea. What I was suggesting was a ban on the abilities Sand Veil and Snow Cloak, but only at such a time when everything that has those abilities also has a legal second option. That way, nothing is banned unnecessarily, a loophole around the evasion clause (which is a part of standard rules, like it or not) is removed, and of course random bullshit like losing to Garchomp because your 100% accurate Ice Beam missed is eliminated (and please don't make stupid arguments like "use aerial ace" when we're talking about a pokemon with defensive stats higher than Swampert).
 
Okay, I seriously hate Skymin now. When used against you, it would flinch you like 4 or 5 times without fail, while when I use it myself, Air Slash would miss twice in a row quite often.
 
Okay, I seriously hate Skymin now. When used against you, it would flinch you like 4 or 5 times without fail, while when I use it myself, Air Slash would miss twice in a row quite often.

Evo Stone Porygon2 is 5HKOed by Air Slash. And it has Recover. And it can OHKO Skymin with Ice Beam.

If that doesn't make you a counter, I don't know what does.

But Skymin wins every time because it flinches Porygon2 4 times in a row.
 
Evo Stone Porygon2 is 5HKOed by Air Slash. And it has Recover. And it can OHKO Skymin with Ice Beam.
If that doesn't make you a counter, I don't know what does.
Its still 2hk0'd by Seed flare however accounting in the S.def drop of course.So not really a very good counter.
I'd say the best this thread produced in terms of Shaymin-S counters was Specially deffensive afro bull.
Anyway..I honestly think banning sand veil is going a bit too far but i just dropped like 10 ranks out from top 3 because i missed 1 ice beam and 1 Hp ice on a garchomp so wtf bann that shit and il be very very happy ;].
Edit: Derp.
 
Its still 2hk0'd by Seed flare however accounting in the S.def drop of course.So not really a very good counter.

I didn't mean counter as in an actual counter.
I thought it would be obvious that I purposefully left out Seed Flare, because NO ONE talks about Skymin and "forgets" Seed Flare.
But apparently it wasn't obvious.

Anyway, my point wasn't even about countering Skymin. It was an example of how it can hax its way through pokemon which threaten it, thanks to Serene Grace.



Crobat is the best Skymin counter.
Crobat will never be OHKOed by Timid LO Skymin's Air Slash, even after Stealth Rock.
But Jolly Crobat will always OHKO Timid LO Skymin with Brave Bird, assuming it runs at least 124 Atk EVs.
 
Read above.

Also, Octillery, as I said, needs to get the Speed boost on that first turn so it can go first. It's so slow that most offensive pokemon can attack before it Subs and get it to <25% so that it cannot Sub.

Of course, defensive pokemon are basically set-up fodder for it. They let it get a free Sub ad then it can truly become broken. But that's not my point. My point is in my reply to shrang, directly above.
Ok. Well I didn't ask you about your stance on the matter, I just wanted to make sure you knew that your faux-consistent is an inaccurate representation of how a battle would normally play out for an Inconsistent user. I'm not talking about what boosts you get or how many teams you sweep, but the moves you'd make to maximize success. I don't know where you got "3 chances" from, but it's wrong.

First, you start off subbing on something you know you can force out or can't harm you, or Protect on something that can only do moderate damage to you at best and hope you get something good as you set up a sub next turn. By the time the suitable response comes in, you have the advantage. You can Protect from behind the sub, sub immediately after the attack, and stall out for boosts.

Keep in mind that I'm in no way implying you'll get any gamebreaking boosts before you run out of juice; I've gone through a full stall session without getting anything good. The point is that even the most narrow of setup opportunities gives you way more than three chances to stall for good boosts. And Bibarel praying for an evasion boost vs. a Fighting type as the last Pokemon is not a narrow setup opportunity, it's gg.
 
Oh yeah and all this kingdra hype...To be honest I find Kabutops, Qwilfish, hell even poliwrath a LOT more threatening. Nattorei dominates pretty much all kingdra sets while burungeru is a great switch-in to the mixed set. Kingdra is probably the easiest "rain abuser" of the lot to play around.
 
@The guy who used the "banning hax" analogy:
They actually had a poll on that in PR. Go figure.

Anyways, why are people complaining about Sand Veil and Snow Cloak? If I recall, Glaceon and Sandslash were never banned for having evasion boosts. If you can't deal with a Pokemon at +1 Evasion, than
A) That Pokemon is broken
but far more likely...
B) Your team has a weakness to it, so you just yell broken to avoid having to deal with it

But seriously, I just saw posts about the banning of Bidoof and Jumpluff. Can we please not yell "Glaceon is broken!" before we at least address more powerful threats (who I still don't think should be banned).
 
The thing about hax is, if it's removable, a lot of people would just ban it. We don't have to accept hax if it's removable. If crits were removable I'd definitely move to ban them.
 
The basis behind the ban of evasion is not that it's necesarily broken. It's that it's luck based shit.

And I believe statistical analysis shows that 1 boost of evasion is best in terms of set-up time versus benefit, meaning that sand veil/snow cloak is even better than double team (not sure about minimize) since you don't need to set it up and it doesn't take up a moveslot.
 
While I back the removal of Inconsistent, due to the evasion and general ability to sweep by stalling with sub and protect, people talking about the removal of crits and other form of hax have clearly gone too far. Where do you stop with this, if a pokemon is fully paralysed, is that hax? Do we remove that from the game? Lava Plume's burn chance? Sacred Fire's burn chance? We don't remove these because even if you get critted once you can use the rest of your team to play around this whereas with evasion even if you have six counters to your opponents pokemon if you don't have a counter to evasion itself you can lose through sheer luck.
 
i think if someone say mence is banworthy it is arguable that nite come close.
Nite in this gen work very well due to MS and his helpin bulk. Seting him up is so easy like hell with this factor. Assuming a HO team with formula of
lead + set up + wobb + Bronzong as said by Shrang nite is a great choice in the sweeper slot(yeah and this is not uber where dual screen + groudon, dancing and polished since 2007 and will not Ohkoed by most priority = oh crap)

Among OU mon

The big 4 : mana is troubling me. Skymin is lucky factor, rai depend on set, and deo a is meh. So i only disagree on Deo-A tbh.

Mew: best set is stall set due to abundance of below base 100 and nattrei buru core(depend on set mew running too. Natt buru need both WoW and toxic to be handled reliably)

Mence : DD mence is now standard and mixmence is now too standard too. His WB-ing is hindered by that nattrunkeru core. DD mence risk burn and mixmence meteor is lol and buru will just burn and stall to hell. Its about time mence isnt dangerous anymore
(okay if you dont know even SPECS zandora cant deal enough damage to 2HKO with DM so dont hope for mixmence)

Garchomp : mixed opinion tbh. SD set is very dangerous unlike most said. Scarf usage has go down since sd set is now very popular and threatening. Set up is fairly easy and he can plow through team easily.

Dragonite : no one will expect nite to be such a beast dontcha ? even in beggining o gen 5 many say nite will be UU after all . But now what happen is beyond imagination. Nite become serious beast. Its insane bulk combined with set up is insane. But still not overpowered. Nite danger level is on par with garchomp and mence.
 
My comment about hax was about removable hax. The only reason we've come to accept secondary effects and crits and such is that we cannot remove them at all. These matter at times and may turn an easy win into a loss. But I was just talking about a hypothetical in which they could be removed.
 
regular sd chomp is not too crazy and same case with yachechomp
Bulky Haban chomp on the other hand....
 
i think if someone say mence is banworthy it is arguable that nite come close.
Nite in this gen work very well due to MS and his helpin bulk. Seting him up is so easy like hell with this factor. Assuming a HO team with formula of
lead + set up + wobb + Bronzong as said by Shrang nite is a great choice in the sweeper slot(yeah and this is not uber where dual screen + groudon, dancing and polished since 2007 and will not Ohkoed by most priority = oh crap)

Among OU mon

The big 4 : mana is troubling me. Skymin is lucky factor, rai depend on set, and deo a is meh. So i only disagree on Deo-A tbh.

Mew: best set is stall set due to abundance of below base 100 and nattrei buru core(depend on set mew running too. Natt buru need both WoW and toxic to be handled reliably)

Mence : DD mence is now standard and mixmence is now too standard too. His WB-ing is hindered by that nattrunkeru core. DD mence risk burn and mixmence meteor is lol and buru will just burn and stall to hell. Its about time mence isnt dangerous anymore
(okay if you dont know even SPECS zandora cant deal enough damage to 2HKO with DM so dont hope for mixmence)

Garchomp : mixed opinion tbh. SD set is very dangerous unlike most said. Scarf usage has go down since sd set is now very popular and threatening. Set up is fairly easy and he can plow through team easily.

Dragonite : no one will expect nite to be such a beast dontcha ? even in beggining o gen 5 many say nite will be UU after all . But now what happen is beyond imagination. Nite become serious beast. Its insane bulk combined with set up is insane. But still not overpowered. Nite danger level is on par with garchomp and mence.

Agreed with pretty much everything said here.
At least that's how I feel.
Mence, while still a very powerful sweeper/pokemon, I don't see it being any better than Dragonite overall anymore. To be honest, I can see some saying/preferring dragonite as the overall better DDer than mence (I wouldn't but still won't ever deny that dragonite's effectiveness has skyrocketed in this gen.

As for garchomp, I've been saying the SD sweeper set is not as blend as some have been saying. While it's true it's not as effective as it was in the early stages of DP, I don't see it being any less effective than it was when it was a suspect back in DPPt (esp when the latis were suspects).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top