np: OU Suspect Testing Round 3 - So Long and Thanks for all the Fish

Status
Not open for further replies.
You contradict yourself in your part here.You first go off on a tangent about what we can call broken, but then say that not all broken pokemon are bad for the metagame. You then state how broken pokemon invariably significantly harm the metagame, directly contradicting your previous point. Which one is it?

Also, you can't call just anything broken (lol at Dragonite being broken), but there's not even a debate about that. Whether or not something is broken is not a philosophical question, it's a question of how powerful it is in relation to the rest of the metagame, which is why Dragonite isn't broken.

You misunderstand me because I didnt state my own personal views on a top pokemon. The metagame revolves around the top pokemon and changes the face of that tier to represent them. In this way yes a pokemon can be deemed broken. However, A pokemon can only really be deemed broken if it negatively impacts the metagame. It's like last gen with Latias and Salamence. With those two the metagame was mainly a Dragon/Steel Metagame and was rather centralized. Once those two were banned more pokemon came into the metagame from UU and bottom OUs started to be used more. More pokemon came to make the face of the new Top threat Heatran. The metagame became more F/W/G oriented and more pokemon became viable.

The "Face" of the metagame are the major pokemon in said metagame. When a major pokemon is banned the face changes because new threats present themselves and the metagame inevitably becomes better for it. I hope that clears things up a little bit.

You also misunderstood me about Dragonite as I was using that as an example of a pokemon that isn't broken. Dragonite's mixed set is a major wallbreaker which gives it an advantage against stall teams. However, just because Dragonite has an advantage in this aspect doesn't mean that it's broken. I was using this as an example of why Valkyries' statement seemed invalid to me.
 
The banning of Blaziken is something I personally feel the need to disagree on, but I simply won't. I know for a fact that I did not have enough metagame experience during its prime, even though the little experience I had prior to its prime, I had zero problems with it. Coupling that with the fact that the voting pool reached a super majority, I'll give the voters the benefit of the doubt---and rightfully so.

However, Latios is something I do have experience with, and I am completely against it leaving this generation. It has numerous checks, it has numerous counters, and Pursuit walks all over it. It's simple nomination is enough reason for me to attempt to get voting rights as I see no reason this should be sent to Ubers.
 
Blaziken is gone, thank goodness. Now maybe everyone will stop having to run something that can check him, or lose the game. And these checks were very few and far between...

Infernape will still be around though, and he does the exact same Blaziken did... with Nasty Plot, a wider movepool, better initial speed, while lacking Speed Boost and HJK. Still perfectly viable. Just not broken. *shot for dreaful pun*


Anyway, Slowbro useage is almost certain to plummmet. He probobly rose so high due to the 'Salamence syndrome'. Azumarill, however, is still awesome. Seriously, I'm of the opinion Azumarill is 5th Gen's best revenge killer... fact that Nattorei love to stay in or switch in, only to get a face full of Superpower and OHKO'ed is awesome too...

Also, for those of you saying Latios is not broken because Tyranitar counters it:

1: Tyranitar is everywhere, due to weather wars. This makes it seem that Latios isn't that much of an issue, because about 1/3 of players are using Tyranitar.
2: Did Tyranitar stop Lati@s being banned last gen? No. It's not like Lati@s gained any counters in Gen 5 either. Ferrothorn is a check, it does nothing to stop Latios, and Latios could carry HP Fire [Or Trick], especially as it is checked mainly by Steel-types. Usually, compareing 4th gen to 5th is not really relevant, but since Latios' counters haven't changed much, and neither has Latios or it's 'counters'... yeah, if Tyranitar didn't prevent Latios being Uber last gen, then unless the power creep in general makes it less effective that obscene hings introduced in Gen 5, it should still be Uber.
 
Why are people consistently arguing that because a pokemon can run coverage moves for its checks (and predict their switch-ins), they are all of a sudden broken? Latios is just like any other coverage sweeper in that regard, and it did in fact gain various checks.

SpD Tar, SpD Scizor, Jirachi, Metagross, Tornadus, Thundurus, Starmie, Ferrothorn, Escavalier...the list goes on. You don't need to 100% counter Latios for it to be unbroken. The metagame adapting to its presence is not evidence of it being "broken," either. It is akin to Gliscor running Jolly to check Ice Punch Lucario post Platinum.
 
Also, for those of you saying Latios is not broken because Tyranitar counters it:

1: Tyranitar is everywhere, due to weather wars. This makes it seem that Latios isn't that much of an issue, because about 1/3 of players are using Tyranitar.
2: Did Tyranitar stop Lati@s being banned last gen? No. It's not like Lati@s gained any counters in Gen 5 either. Ferrothorn is a check, it does nothing to stop Latios, and Latios could carry HP Fire [Or Trick], especially as it is checked mainly by Steel-types. Usually, compareing 4th gen to 5th is not really relevant, but since Latios' counters haven't changed much, and neither has Latios or it's 'counters'... yeah, if Tyranitar didn't prevent Latios being Uber last gen, then unless the power creep in general makes it less effective that obscene hings introduced in Gen 5, it should still be Uber.

Pokemon are not broken in isolation. They are broken by comparison to the rest of the metagame. There is no "it seems that Latios isn't that much of an issue". If it seems that way, it's because it is. If it appears that Latios isn't a problem because Tyranitar is preventing it from becoming problematic, it's because those are the facts.

Also, I am tired of playing this game of checks and counters. Excluding the fact that Latios does have an assortment of both, counters are no longer the name of the game anymore. This should be apparent to everyone in this thread and yet it seems to be the focal point of every discussion on every suspect and it's redundant as all get out.

Ultimately, when concerning an offensive threat, it comes down to how well a player can deal with the threat. There are three methods:

- Crippling it via status
- Out speeding it and overpowering it
- Walling it and wearing it down

While it's not entirely as black and white as that, and it is subject to interpretation on a case by case basis, these are the fundamentals.

Latios can be crippled via status. He may not suffer from burn, and sleep is not readily available within his speed tier, we have plenty of Pokemon who can paralyze him (particularly with priority Thunder Wave and Stun Spore).

Latios is fast, but it is not the fastest Pokemon in the metagame right now. Latias and Gengar tie with it, while Tornadus, Thunderus, Cinccino, Azelf, Floatzel, Ambipom, Raikou, Starmie, Weavile, Aerodactyl, Jolteon, Accelgor, and Deoxys-S all outrun him cleanly. Some of these are used more than others, but they are all at least worth some variation of consideration.

Latios also happens to have lower physical defenses (and does not often invest in to them) thus he is a primary target for priority moves, namely Ice Shard and Bullet Punch.

I'd also note that there are Choice Scarfers such as Jirachi are able to aptly check Latios with their speed via moves such as U-Turn.

Where Latios excels is his ability to break through defenses, however even that can be accounted for. Any form of Snorlax will shut him down, and Tyranitar (especially ones with Special Defense EV invested variants) are very capable. While Scizor, Escavalier and other Pursuit users can't switch in safely to every move, they are very capable of walking in on a Draco Meteor (which isn't too hard to predict), or they can clean up after Latios has managed a KO and act as effective checks.

And please don't tell me that if you're bringing in something to deal with Latios after its killed something, it has done its job, thus [insertranthereaboutlatiosbeinguber]. Most top OU threats do there job. That's why they're good.

Anyway, it should be obvious that Latios is excellent, but there are plenty of ways to deal with it.
 
Snorlax loses to Latios. Psyshock is a clean 2HKO on a Snorlax with max SpD, and if it's running max defence then it dies to Draco Meteor.
 
Wait wait. Why on earth is normal blaze Blaziken banned as well?

Collateral damage. While it's far from broken, we're (hopefully) not going to start doing Pokémon+Ability or Pokémon+Move bans, so Blaze Blaziken goes too.

I daresay that Cosmic Power/Spikes/Recover/Magic Coat Deoxys-A wouldn't be broken, but that's banned for the exact same reason.
 
Shit just happen

Previous gen : Blaziken : a very good UU wallbreaker Outclassed by Infernape

This gen : Blaziken Top Tier(Hopely) UBER SWEEPER

Anyway to those saying Blaziken blaze is banned maybe because of No ability Combo ban. On Drizzle and Drought we only have exact one poke in the pool/
 
The reason Blaze Blaziken is banned is the same reason Fatmence was banned in gen 4 ou. When a broken pokemon gets banned, all of it's sets get banned, even the non-broken ones.
 
A broken Pokemon ALWAYS gives a significant advantage against every team. I apologize for not making that distinction clear.
So basically, any general Uber such as Palkia and Darkrai are broken because they give a significant advantage to most teams.

Assuming that a broken pokemon is considered an Uber, for a pokemon to be broken it has to cause a significant change to the metagame to the effect that it would be more balanced if the pokemon in question (such as Blazkien) was removed.

Im guessing that Blaziken was banned by majority because most people thought it gave them too much of an advantage as a sweeper compared to other Pokemon?
 
Collateral damage. While it's far from broken, we're (hopefully) not going to start doing Pokémon+Ability...

But y'all already have banned Pokemon+Ability in certain circumstances with Swift Swimmers + Drizzle. For example you can have Kingdra + Sniper + Drizzle but not Kingrda + Swift Swim + Drizzle. Banning Blaze Blaziken is...I don't even know the word for how utterly dumb it is.
 
Im guessing that Blaziken was banned by majority because most people thought it gave them too much of an advantage as a sweeper compared to other Pokemon?

A large factor is that it has no hard counters outside of Slowbro (who dies to a mixed set), as well as just being insanely good in general. Overcentralisation to counter it could be argued as well.

But y'all already have banned Pokemon+Ability in certain circumstances with Swift Swimmers + Drizzle. For example you can have Kingdra + Sniper + Drizzle but not Kingrda + Swift Swim + Drizzle. Banning Blaze Blaziken is...I don't even know the word for how utterly dumb it is.

No, we banned Swift Swim+Drizzle on the same team. No pokemon+abilities have been banned at all. It would open a can of worms we don't want to get into. And like the above say, we can't just ban broken aspects on mons to make them unbroken - moves for example - unless the ability in itself is broken, like Moody was, or Drizzle and Drought are believed to be by some. Speed Boost alone clearly does not break something, and neither does Swift Swim alone, for example.
 
From semi-hero to zero and back up to hero. I actually kinda feel bad for Blaziken, its pretty much doomed to Ubers for the entirety of gen V. We all thought Speed Boost was a blessing for the flamimg chicken, but its in fact a curse. On the bright side Infernape can start dominating again.
 
Have we ever been in the situation where a Pokémon with two possible abilities has been deemed broken with one and not the other before, though? I think Blaziken might be the first time this situation has come up; in which case, maybe it would be better to set precedent and ban Speed Boost Blaziken alone.
 
Have we ever been in the situation where a Pokémon with two possible abilities has been deemed broken with one and not the other before, though? I think Blaziken might be the first time this situation has come up; in which case, maybe it would be better to set precedent and ban Speed Boost Blaziken alone.

NO. Blaziken has a broken set, therefore it is a broken pokemon. It is irrelevant whether it requires a certain ability to make the set broken.

To ban a pokemon + ability combination is absolutely as arbitrary as banning a pokemon + move combination. After all, I doubt Blaziken would be Uber without HJK.
 
Have we ever been in the situation where a Pokémon with two possible abilities has been deemed broken with one and not the other before, though? I think Blaziken might be the first time this situation has come up; in which case, maybe it would be better to set precedent and ban Speed Boost Blaziken alone.

Without Speed Boost, Blaziken would probably be worthless though - inadequate bulk for something with such a low speed, and outclassed pretty much entirely by Darmanitan for a Choice set, and Nape for a boosting set. There's not really a discernable benefit to letting us use Blaze Ken anyway, so it seems not worth challenging policy for it alone.
 
NO. Blaziken has a broken set, therefore it is a broken pokemon. It is irrelevant whether it requires a certain ability to make the set broken.

To ban a pokemon + ability combination is absolutely as arbitrary as banning a pokemon + move combination. After all, I doubt Blaziken would be Uber without HJK.

You mean like how Swift Swim Kingdra is banned on my team whereas Sniper Kingdra is allowed? Isn't that just as arbitrary?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top