I would rather not die after just subbing in, yes.
And now, Q & A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat
UncleSam
However, my vote will remain on you until you answer a few more questions:
-It looks to me like you are simply trying to redirect suspicion towards an (admittedly retarded) post from a noobie, and are just going after the easiest target. Any reason you don't mention ANY other suspicions other than towards Leethoof?
Other suspicions somewhat dilute the strength of a case against a particular user. I just highlighted the most suspicious player FMPOV at the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat
UncleSam
-What do you think of the other vocal users up to this point? Please address each of the following: Myself, Blue_Tornado, Paperblade, Yeti, Ditto, zorbees, Brammi, anyone else I forgot.
The Uncle: jegus lemme post.
*ahem*
Mr. Sam is known for promoting a view of that the announcer should claim, stirring up discussion, being the target of a samwagon, and now arguing with BT. I personally think he's somewhat townlike, but I don't like the side argument that's going on right now.
The Tornado: Got defensive about being jumpy (Post 76) after a bit of pressure from a query about Sam's millslogic. Said defense evolved into a defense of his defensiveness in post 91, and later on a defense of his denial of defending billymills in post 95. Doesn't like the samwagon. I think he's a bit hyper or something, and that the two of them should try and move on.
The Blade: AKA the only person I've seen in an NOC before. He's acting like townblade from my experience.
The Yeti: makes some good points about kidnapper, and is skeptical wrt Sam. I get a town vibe, personally.
The Ditto: Methinks he doth protest too much. Probably should discuss the announcer topic instead of defending his setup idea. I understand that he does not like D1, but even still, it would be productive for him to post his position.
The Zorbees: Is RVSing, and now has switch to a Sam Lynch. I disagree with the Sam Lynch personally, but I see the logic behind it. He's made his position clear on the announcer issue, but other than the random votes and the explanation based on the opinions, I can't get a read on him.
The Brammi: Jumped on Sam's bandwagon twice, so it looks like he's following him. I get this feeling he's overreading, but that might just be me. Another thing that bothers me is that he considers a single vote in the RVS 'weak', when that's really the whole point of the exercise. X votes Y to see how they react. =/
The Ninjask: Post the First was pretty solid, seeing as it was anti-troll lynch + RVS vote, both of which I advocate to some extent. Post the Second was a bit of stating the obvious. Post the third was a counter to Brammi's weak vote comment and a change of trains to Snype/me. I believe he's someone town-telling.
The Coronis: I found their elaboration inadequate, and attempts to justify their echoing highly suspect. I'd like to ask
why he agrees with Yeti and Sam, instead of just saying "oh I'm agreeing with them" and leaving it at that. It's essentially follow the leader mindlessly, otherwise. Suspect The Second, behind Leethoof.
The Kong: First post was sort of omgus, without the vote. His two 'serious' posts were to vote Coronis to pressure him for reasoning, promote activity, to provide a warning about clear townies who don't know how to play proper mafia, and to explain to Coronis even more clearly why he was voting him. I found it solid, but it'd be nice to see more of his posting material.
The Ultra: I have no idea what he was trying to say in that post. He just said 24 man village, so he should probably post more and elaborate that.
The Mills: Contribution to this thread consists of asking for a bell, refusing to elaborate about why, saying that there's nothing off about Sam and I, apparently, keeping his vote on Red while stating he is suspicious of ditto, and trying to advise BT to stop buddying him. Then he goes and votes with zorbees on UncleSam. I don't get town vibes from him, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's mafia.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat
UncleSam
-What do you think of the notable silences from several players I for one would expect to be active? I am looking at TalkingLion (who is currently hosting a game and has been active but hasn't posted in this thread once), jalmont, MK Ultra (his lone post was WAYYYYY too friendly for my tastes), and most especially billymills.
Lion's one post is inadequate FMPOV, but you're already hard at work trying to address that.
Jalmont hasn't said anything other than correcting Quagsires once, which looked like something like an attempt to appear to be contributing. Post more, etc...
I already addressed Mr. Mills and Ultra MK.I.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat
UncleSam
-Do you think it is a bad idea for the announcer to step up at this very moment because we have discussion going (my viewpoint) or would you have thought the same right from the start of Day 1 (BT/PBlade's/zorbees' viewpoint)?
I think it's a bad idea because wedk his faction, and even if he claimed, he wouldn't be clear. This would mean we'd have to waste an inspection on them to clean them, and to do so also carries the risk of a role like an interceptor potentially killing the inspector off.
tl;dr Snike sux