Other XY OU Viability Ranking Thread (B- and C+ Pokemon discussion)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Volcarona could fit in B+. Both offensive and bulky sets have merit in the metagame, and are especially notable for beating slower special attacking Water-types (bar Manaphy) one-on-one. Offensive sets can get really dangerous really quickly, and can screw up certain defensive responses with either Giga Drain or Hidden Power Ground. Bulky sets put their resistances and SpD boost from Quiver Dance to much better use, and can outlast and overpower bulky threats with Roost or even occasionally make use of Flame Body to soften certain hits (mainly Fighting-types that forgo Rock coverage). The Stealth Rock weakness as well as the presence of Talonflame, Mega-Pinsir and Azumarill do not do it any favors whatsoever, but an amazing boosting move in Quiver Dance coupled with very nice STABs are hard to ignore.
B+ sounds like a good spot for it. It definitely needs a lot of support - namely hazard removal - but physically defensive Volcarona's been working wonders for me (248HP/252Def/8SpAtk Modest). It can safely switch in on a lot of relevant threats, namely Genesect and Mega Lucario, and can even set up against Rotom-W then heal up with Giga Drain if it hasn't volt switched out.

Some calcs of interest:
+1 4 Atk Genesect U-turn vs. 248 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 68-81 (18.2 - 21.7%) -- possible 7HKO after Leftovers recovery
+1 4 Atk Genesect Extreme Speed vs. 248 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 104-123 (27.8 - 32.9%) -- 84.2% chance to 4HKO after Leftovers recovery
+1 252 SpA Genesect Flamethrower vs. 248 HP / 0 SpD Volcarona: 134-158 (35.9 - 42.3%) -- 92.7% chance to 3HKO after Leftovers recovery
0+ SpA Volcarona Fiery Dance vs. 0 HP / 0 SpD Genesect: 508-604 (179.5 - 213.4%) -- guaranteed OHKO

Flame Body is the icing on the cake here, and has swung several matches in my favor by taking the edge off of U-Turns.

252 Atk Adaptability Mega Lucario Close Combat vs. 248 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 147-173 (39.4 - 46.3%) -- guaranteed 3HKO after Leftovers recovery
252 Atk Mega Lucario Extreme Speed vs. 248 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 98-116 (26.2 - 31%) -- 9.7% chance to 4HKO after Leftovers recovery
252 Atk Adaptability Mega Lucario Bullet Punch vs. 248 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 50-59 (13.4 - 15.8%) -- possibly the worst move ever
252 SpA Adaptability Mega Lucario Aura Sphere/Flash Cannon vs. 248 HP / 0 SpD Volcarona: 89-105 (23.8 - 28.1%) -- possible 5HKO after Leftovers recovery
0+ SpA Volcarona Fiery Dance vs. 0 HP / 4 SpD Mega Lucario: 326-386 (116 - 137.3%) -- guaranteed OHKO

It's completely safe for Volcarona to switch in on any common attack from Mega Luc or SD/NP, take a hit, and then OHKO in return. In a similar vein, Volc can be used to revenge a +2 Lucario. The only thing it needs to worry about is Stone Edge, but a Mega Luc running Stone Edge has things other than Volcarona to worry about.

(hi everyone first post)
 
I'm not being an authority figure, you are just being ignorant to the fact that Ammongus is outclassed in it's role by other OU Pokemon. It is bulky and has Regenerator, making it hard to OHKO, but in the end, there are many OU threats that can handle it in battle, and many supportive Pokemon that can prefer it's role better. If you really want to put something to sleep, Smeargle and Venusuar (even without it's mega), are examples of better options. No rank, unless you really want it to have a C-/D.

I think a defensive pivot alone is sufficient to hit C+/B-, I seriously think that you have been underestimating the power of regenerator, 1/3 health per switch out is a lot. What this mean is that you can throw in this mon randomly and take a hit, either threatens you opponent with a sleep for those which cannot KO you, or try a double switch if they may want to get a grass type out, and do not lose any momentum in the prossess, which can not be done by any other sleep inducer(besides yawn Slowbro perhaps) in the meta. It does possess a lot of flaws, but regenerator is sufficient to allow it to stand out and have a kind of niche.
 
I think a defensive pivot alone is sufficient to hit C+/B-, I seriously think that you have been underestimating the power of regenerator, 1/3 health per switch out is a lot. What this mean is that you can throw in this mon randomly and take a hit, either threatens you opponent with a sleep for those which cannot KO you, or try a double switch if they may want to get a grass type out, and do not lose any momentum in the prossess, which can not be done by any other sleep inducer(besides yawn Slowbro perhaps) in the meta. It does possess a lot of flaws, but regenerator is sufficient to allow it to stand out and have a kind of niche.
All the truely viable Regenerators (Amoongus, Slowbro/king, and tangrowth(but tangrowth really wants AV)) this gen all can put the oppenent to sleep. Although Amoongus is the only one with spore, the fact that they all can put the oppenent asleep means Amoongus isn't special in the sense.
But I do say Amoongus deserves at least B-, B+ max. B would be a good place for it IMO

There should also be big flashing words next to sylveon saying "FLORGRES WILL NEVER BE RANKED".
Honestly
 
Last edited:
All the truely viable Regenerators (Amoongus, Slowbro/king, and tangrowth(but tangrowth really wants AV)) this gen all can put the oppenent to sleep. Although Amoongus is the only one with spore, the fact that they all can put the oppenent asleep means Amoongus isn't special in the sense.
But I do say Amoongus deserves at least B-, B+ max. B would be a good place for it IMO

There should also be big flashing words next to sylveon saying "FLORGRES WILL NEVER BE RANKED".
Honestly

I was talking about C+/B- to begin with lol

For Florges, well, if it gets an extra grass typing than it may actually worth a second glance, which should be rational consider everything presented in her kit.
 
I was talking about C+/B- to begin with lol

For Florges, well, if it gets an extra grass typing than it may actually worth a second glance, which should be rational consider everything presented in her kit.
Grass/Fairy is a worse defensive typing than Fairy. its weak to more than the two almost irrelivant weaknesses in poison and steel
 
C Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who can be effective given the right support, but either have crippling flaws that prevent them from consistently executing their strategy or are completely eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks.

Amoongus is the DEFINITION of C rank being completely outclassed by Mega Venusaur.
 
Grass/Fairy is a worse defensive typing than Fairy. its weak to more than the two almost irrelivant weaknesses in poison and steel

Why are we even talking about extra typings as this really has nothing to do with tiering. And again we are NOT ranking Florges.
 
I'm not being an authority figure, you are just being ignorant to the fact that Ammongus is outclassed in it's role by other OU Pokemon. It is bulky and has Regenerator, making it hard to OHKO, but in the end, there are many OU threats that can handle it in battle, and many supportive Pokemon that can prefer it's role better. If you really want to put something to sleep, Smeargle and Venesaur (even without it's mega), are examples of better options. No rank, unless you really want it to have a C-/D.

to be honest, if anyone is being ignorant, it is you. you compare amoonguss to smeargle and whimsicott and to venesaur without his mega stone and say amoonguss has leech seed when he doesn't b/c you don't play against him often. none of those pokemon mentioned act similarly to amoonguss. no one runs a defensive regular venesaur without its mega stone. smeargle is a suicuide lead and whimsicott is a prankster user who can shut down set up sweepers with taunt, encore and stun spore. amoonguss, as mentioned before, now backed up by a lot more people, is a bulky pivot switch that can take a hit and force the opponent to switch if it is afraid to be put to sleep.

furthermore, you mention counters like heatran and goodra. your point? goodra counters defensive rotom wash one on one, should rotom wash not get a rank. genesect can't beat heatran one on one, should it not get a rank. seriously, every pokemon has its counter. you just have to predict right on the switch. if a team doesn't have a grass pokemon and a goodra, expect the sap sipper ability and the switch into the amoonguss. btw, no heatran can really switch into amoonguss if you haven't put something to sleep.
moreover, 4 SpA Heatran Lava Plume vs. 252 HP / 116+ SpD Amoonguss: 206-246 (47.6 - 56.9%) -- 31.6% chance to 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery
amoonguss can take a hit from it, and put it to sleep.

the point i'm trying to make is that you can't say a pokemon is useless b/c you obviously don't play it often. you mention other pokemon that fulfill the role better, but those pokemon play completely different roles. amoonguss has a nice role in the current metagame and is a good answer to a volt-turn core as he take the hit, dish out a 4x super effect hit on a scizor or genesect, or giga drain on rotom.

lastly with your calculations (these are very biased and don't even show amoonguss potential)
4 SpA Flash Fire Heatran Lava Plume vs. 252 HP / 252+ SpD Amoonguss: 270-320 (62.5 - 74%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (you have flash fire on)
252 Atk Life Orb Weavile Ice Punch vs. 252 HP / 252+ Def Amoonguss: 273-322 (63.1 - 74.5%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (weavile has so many counters, why would you stay in on him)
252 SpA Life Orb Protean Greninja Ice Beam vs. 252 HP / 252 SpD Amoonguss: 299-354 (69.2 - 81.9%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (can't switch in, unless you predict the water type move, but at least he can take the hit and put it to sleep)
252+ Atk Choice Band Huge Power Azumarill Ice Punch vs. 252 HP / 252+ Def Amoonguss: 270-318 (62.5 - 73.6%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (no azumarill runs ice punch! it is either knock off or superpower on their last move slot. amoonguss doesn't mind a knock off thanks to regenerator and superpower on him, isn't really that super)

also i forgot to mention, amoonguss is pretty good when it comes to scouting (choice bands or choice specs) as he can take the hit and then based off the damage, figure out what kind of set the pokemon is. is it expert belt or choice scarf, choice specs or choice banded. also if a rotom was goes for a trick, amoonguss won't mind (black sludge) and amoonguss doesn't need his recovery, he can always go for spore or an attack.

the only point i agree with you on is his low speed. i actually don't like ur reasoning. a lot of walls can be taunted easily, however amoonguss' role isn't to stay in long and retaliate back. you mention thundurus with prankster and taunt stopping it. i talked earlier how amoonguss is a strong check to nasty plot thundurus as it can clear smog the nasty plote and live the hp ice at 70% with a nasty plot boost (check calcs on pg 55) before doing so. if the thundurus is a taunt set, switch into tyranitar (or at least another check), a very good check and counter to him. but back to the point about speed, i sometimes find it hard to double switch with him as faster mons like rotom, instead of staying in, can always volt switch out so sometimes you have to stay in on the hit, even though you know the switch is coming.

i currently have a core of landorus I(bulky pivot switch), assault max spdef tyranitar, my amazing amoonguss, healing wish, defog, life orb latias, and a choice scarf rotom wash as my core with my team and a nasty plot lucario as my setup sweeper. with the right core, amoonguss can fill an effective role on an offensive balanced team.
 
Why are we even talking about extra typings as this really has nothing to do with tiering. And again we are NOT ranking Florges.
I am completely aware. i was just merely saying that even if florgres had a dual typing that was grass/fairy it would be even worse. I said in an earlier post that we should just put "WE ARE NEVER RANKING FLORGRES" in the OP
 
C Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who can be effective given the right support, but either have crippling flaws that prevent them from consistently executing their strategy or are completely eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks.

Amoongus is the DEFINITION of C rank being completely outclassed by Mega Venusaur.

You are switching in a lot more frequently than Megasaur, and you have an extra move slot because synthesis is not mandatory, you also get your item slot, all these together should be enough to make a difference. I am honestly curious why people are so underwhelmed by regenerator? It is arguably the top 5 defensive ability one pokemon may have.
 
C Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who can be effective given the right support, but either have crippling flaws that prevent them from consistently executing their strategy or are completely eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks.

Amoongus is the DEFINITION of C rank being completely outclassed by Mega Venusaur.
Not quite. Access to Spore over Sleep Powder is a selling point, but the main reason to run Amoongus over Venu is its ability as a pivot. Constant switching does take its toll on Venusaur, especially if you plan on constantly switching about, taking light hits and switching out quickly, which Amoongus does rather well thanks to Regenerator.

Venusaur does outclass it as a tank and a pure wall thanks to its greater bulk and offenses, but I'd think that Amoongus can carve out a niche as a utility pivot.
 
I'd weigh in at C for Amoongus- it walls well, spore is great, but its too onedimensional and easily countered, which is the crippling flaw. Its also partially outclassed by msaur.
Possibly C+, having seen its uber usage, but that probably isn't relevant.
 
Unless I read the list wrong, breloom isn't on it. I think it at least deserves a mention, though talonflame weakened it a lot. It could still be viable, albeit with sash and stone edge a must.
techloom likes rock tomb more than stone edge since it's 60BP, 95% accurate, and the speed drop is a nice effect too
 
"C Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who can be effective given the right support, but either have crippling flaws that prevent them from consistently executing their strategy or are completely eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks."

I think the phrase in bold needs to be clarified or reworded to make it more clear. If a pokemon is completely outclassed by a pokemon used in OU, it shouldn't be on the list at all regardless of its effectiveness. For example, Sylveon vs. Florges. It can be agreed that Sylveon completely outclasses Florges as the role of a specially defensive fairy type that offers cleric support. Florges was rightfully taken off the list because of this fact. However, it clearly meets the definition of a C. Technically, nothing can exist as a C if we are only including viable OU mons. It is illogical to use something that is completely outclassed by something else, so it is not viable.

"I understand what is meant here, but I think a lot of equivocation is confusing the message. I think the part in bold needs to reworded to something like, "Or are mostly eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks." or just omitted.

Just because something is completely outclassed by something else does not mean it is not viable. It means you shouldn't use it. Those things are actually different. A pokemon is viable if it can be used to reasonable effect, which florges actually can, even if there is NO excuse for using it whatsoever.

That is clearly not what is meant by viable for this thread. Jolteon and Florges were removed because you should not use them. They are clearly viable by your definition and should be listed, but they are not. Why? Because viability in this case means this, "Using it over something similar does not always decrease your chances of winning."
 
Last edited:
Just because something is completely outclassed by something else does not mean it is not viable. It means you shouldn't use it. Those things are actually different. A pokemon is viable if it can be used to reasonable effect, which florges actually can, even if there is NO excuse for using it whatsoever.

Regarding Amoonguss, it's not only partially outclassed by venusaur (it's saving grace being the mega slot), but also Tangrowth. Tangrowth just has all-round better stats than amoonguss, as well as access to Earthquake to deal with heatran and other steels without resorting to hidden power. It has a generally better attacking movepool, actually, if you exclude foul play. Assault vest Tangrowth is probably a B rank mon. The poison typing is a key difference, of course. I don't rate it too much offensively; it really needs mega venusaur's excellent special attack stat to be useful, because it largely only hits neutrally (or against pokemon with fantastic special defense). Defensively, I suppose it is worth rather a lot, though. U-turn doesn't generally do all that much to tangrowth, but the fairy resistance actually makes a substantial difference against Azumarill and Mawile.
 
If something shouldnt be used, then it shouldnt be ranked. Thats why i hate the D-E-F rank novelties. Theres no reason to rank things that are clearly inferior to others, this doesnt really help the players or the metagame at all.

They might be lower ranks because they fill a specific niche that is very noteworthy and has potential, but might not be seeing play right now or requires a specific team dynamic players haven't used yet. Magnezone and Magneton are good examples of this. Though I agree that I would throw something like those in to say C tier. Getting in to the F tier is a little silly.
 
If something shouldnt be used, then it shouldnt be ranked. Thats why i hate the D-E-F rank novelties. Theres no reason to rank things that are clearly inferior to others, this doesnt really help the players or the metagame at all.

I don't know...there have always been lower-tiered Pokemon that were used in OU, so I don't see why NOT to include those that are usable. Amoonguss has been one of those Pokemon, as have the Nidos, Smeargle, Shedinja (though mostly in Ubers...can you imagine Shedinja in OU? The death rate would be higher than any other Pokemon!)...just to name a few lower-tiered Pokemon. A niche, when properly supported, can become the game winner, especially when it's a usable niche. For example: BW2 Kyurem had a niche with its powerful Blizzard in Hail. Darminitan had a niche with its Sheer Force Flare Blitz+other moves. Do these Pokemon require support? Absolutely. Does that mean they aren't worthy of ranking? Not necessarily, though we must follow the "only Pokemon getting an OU Analysis" rule in regards to our posting. A niche Pokemon that's usable and worth it is worthy of C, while a niche Pokemon that's worth more trouble than its worth (I'm looking at you, Malamar) is D. It shouldn't be THIS hard, guys...
 
In the post I quoted, you mentioned that Amoonguss requires "needless support" to function. Define "needless support" for me, because I'm quite intrigued as to what that would be. You need needless support to sweep with Luvdisc. You need needless support to sweep with Delibird. You need needless support to use ACTUALLY BAD POKEMON, not a RarelyUsed Tank that is Overused Usable and has been since Regenerator came out.

Needless support is unnecessary forms of support that hinders your teams in the long run. Using Delibird, etc. won't help your case, cuz they are just extreme examples of needless support. NS can apply to OU viable pokemon in situations such as having some one like Volcarona on your team after having two other Pokemon (EXP: Charizard Y and Talonflame) weak to Stealth Rocks, cuz then your game plan will be too focused on keeping rocks off the field, than actually dealing damage. Running 3 Pokemon weak to SR would require more Spinners/Defoggers on your team than the average team, cuz if your spinner/Defogger should die, you are screwed!!! This all could have been prevented if you decided not to add another Pokemon weak to SR on the team.

Ammongus is too predictable in today's OU metagame. Grass/Poison typing does allow him to beat Fairies, but remember he's still weak to Fire, Psychic, Flying, and Ice, all very common types today. His bulk and recovery options are his biggest strengths, but his slow speed, and his predictability are weaknesses.

The OU Analysis even stated this for Amoonguss:
"once Sleep Clause is activated, Amoonguss is fairly easy to counter"

Yes, no one would appreciate a Spore at first, but there are many Counters to this move such as Sap Sippers, Sleep Talkers, Lum Berry Sweepers, and Grass Types. The calcs i showed earlier shown Pokemon 2HKO/3HKO Amoonguss with powerful SE moves, but what if they have set up?! The analysis for Ammooguss for OU, UU, and RU list Pokemon that can handle it well. Some of the Pokemon listed, like Crobat in the UU Analysis, are not even OU viable today.

As stated earlier:
"D Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who have a small niche in the current OU metagame, but have very noticable flaws that make them more trouble then their worth the majority of the time."

With that being said, Ammongus has very noticable flaws, with it's only use being to take hits and Recover, or use Spore/Cripple, and thus should be ranked no higher than C-/D, if not, no rank at all.
 
ShadowMarioGalaxy64 Ulevo The problem is when we reach the point that things that have literally no niche and therefore no reason to be used, are being ranked. Amoonguss vs venusaur, darmanitan vs victini, kyurem vs kyurem black is not the same as florges vs sylveon. Amoonguss still has regenerator and doesnt eat a mega slot, darmanitan hits harder and doesnt suffer life orb recoil, kyurem has pressure+subroost. Florges however has no niche that sylveon doesnt fill better and is a clear example of something that should not be ranked ever. Thats also the reason the D rank is useless ''D Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who have a small niche in the current OU metagame, but have very noticable flaws that make them more trouble then their worth the majority of the time.'' If they are not worth the trouble most of the time then why would i ever want to use them and what exactly is the point of ranking them in first place? Maybe if we reach another ''dusclops in uu'' situation, where something is useless in the tier it is in but we have to rank it because it has enough usage to be part of said tier this rank could be useful but for now theres no reason for this to exist.
 
They might be lower ranks because they fill a specific niche that is very noteworthy and has potential, but might not be seeing play right now or requires a specific team dynamic players haven't used yet. Magnezone and Magneton are good examples of this. Though I agree that I would throw something like those in to say C tier. Getting in to the F tier is a little silly.

I agree. Pokemon such as Magnezone, although outclassed by other options, do have some viability in the OU tier to deserve a C-Rank. Magnet Pull came come in handy for trapping Scizor's without Superpower, and killing them off with HP Fire.

Other Pokemon, such as Florges, who has been stated many times to be outclassed by Sylveon, stilll has viability in OU. Sharing the same typing, and very similar stats/moves to Sylveon, Florges can play the same roles it can, as they can both wall Special Attackers that cannot harm them, with Florges having the disadvantage of poor abilities, low HP, and a limited movepool. With that in mind, they should also be checked/countered by the same Pokemon. If Florges truly is less viable than Sylveon, then there should be numerous amounts of OU threats that can check/counter it, while Sylveon can handle those same threats. So the big question is, what Pokemon checks/counters/walls Florges, but is unable to do the same to Sylveon? And vise versa? Some examples could be Blissey/Chansey, who can wall Florges, but because of Sylveon's access to Psyshock, have to be more careful. If this list is small, then Florges should be placed in a Rank below Sylveon, realistically being B-/C+/C. If the list is large, the Florges will be thrown in the D and under category and we can call it a day.
 
I agree. Pokemon such as Magnezone, although outclassed by other options, do have some viability in the OU tier to deserve a C-Rank. Magnet Pull came come in handy for trapping Scizor's without Superpower, and killing them off with HP Fire.

Other Pokemon, such as Florges, who has been stated many times to be outclassed by Sylveon, stilll has viability in OU. Sharing the same typing, and very similar stats/moves to Sylveon, Florges can play the same roles it can, as they can both wall Special Attackers that cannot harm them, with Florges having the disadvantage of poor abilities, low HP, and a limited movepool. With that in mind, they should also be checked/countered by the same Pokemon. If Florges truly is less viable than Sylveon, then there should be numerous amounts of OU threats that can check/counter it, while Sylveon can handle those same threats. So the big question is, what Pokemon checks/counters/walls Florges, but is unable to do the same to Sylveon? And vise versa? Some examples could be Blissey/Chansey, who can wall Florges, but because of Sylveon's access to Psyshock, have to be more careful. If this list is small, then Florges should be placed in a Rank below Sylveon, realistically being B-/C+/C. If the list is large, the Florges will be thrown in the D and under category and we can call it a day.

The problem is that there is literally no good reason atm to use Florges over Sylveon in XY OU. There's no point ranking it whatsoever.
 
Here we go again. Mr. Scytha, let's go by this little by little again.

Needless support is unnecessary forms of support that hinders your teams in the long run.

...oddly enough, I have no major gripes with this definition. Personally, I find Needless Support closer along the lines of "supporting a competitively dead Pokemon", but this works out.

Using Delibird, etc. won't help your case, cuz they are just extreme examples of needless support. NS can apply to OU viable pokemon in situations such as having some one like Volcarona on your team after having two other Pokemon (EXP: Charizard Y and Talonflame) weak to Stealth Rocks, cuz then your game plan will be too focused on keeping rocks off the field, than actually dealing damage. Running 3 Pokemon weak to SR would require more Spinners/Defoggers on your team than the average team, cuz if your spinner/Defogger should die, you are screwed!!! This all could have been prevented if you decided not to add another Pokemon weak to SR on the team.

Now we have a new problem when it comes this needless support: What brain-dead monkey would make a team consisting of Volcarona, Talonflame, AND Charizard Y? Having more than one typing on a team is fine if you have ways to support the Pokemon, but THAT would just be overdoing it. Forget Needless Support; the person responsible for such a team requires needed tutoring or brain surgery.
Getting back on track, it's typically bad team building to put more than two Stealth Rock weak Pokemon on a team without some form of Rapid Spin/Defog Support. That is an example of needed support. Need to remove those Faeries for Hydreigon to pull off a sweep? That's needed support. Support could be as simple as a well made core, not unlike Heatran/Rotom-W/Mega Venusaur.
Also note that Delibird is a "competitively dead Pokemon", therefore it'd be worthless trying to support it (even if Gamefreak gave it Spikes and Destiny Bond...wait a minute...they did?) because it's absolutely dead weight. To avoid needless support, stick to the teambuilding basics and give thought when adding Pokemon. To be fair, if a team of those three Stealth Rock Weak Pokemon did exist, the gameplan for the team would be as you said it would be, which is why teambuilding logic is needed to avoid such a dilemna.

Ammongus is too predictable in today's OU metagame.

1 point for being correct about Amoonguss. This is something I will not argue.

Grass/Poison typing does allow him to beat Fairies, but remember he's still weak to Fire, Psychic, Flying, and Ice, all very common types today. His bulk and recovery options are his biggest strengths, but his slow speed, and his predictability are weaknesses.

Every Pokemon has weaknesses--that's why we throw in teammates that can aid them. That Heatran isn't going to live long against a Ground-Type, so throw in Rotom-W. Have problems with Fight-Types? Throw in a Poison-Type and you're good! Teammates are meant to support each other in some way, whether it be the Double Dragon strategy of Rayquamence where one dies and the other finishes or, as mentioned before, a Defensive Core.

The OU Analysis even stated this for Amoonguss:
"once Sleep Clause is activated, Amoonguss is fairly easy to counter"

I'm not denying that fact, yet there are plenty of Pokemon like that. Once they have done their primary role, some Pokemon ARE relatively easier to counter. Focus Sash Alakazam, for example, will likely lose its Sash, so throw some Priority in the mix. Once Heatran has tanked a few hits, it's likely to have less health and therefore more manageable. I'm just throwing examples out the door, though.

Yes, no one would appreciate a Spore at first, but there are many Counters to this move such as Sap Sippers, Sleep Talkers, Lum Berry Sweepers, and Grass Types.

There is this magical thing called Double Switching, but maybe I'm just being silly. A couple things to note:
Sap Sipper is such a rare ability. What uses it, Goodra? ResTalk Pokemon have come up in the ranking, but Spore can prevent them from using Rest and recovering health, so that's a small boon. If a Sweeper is carrying Lum Berry, they're typically using a boosting move, so Clear Smog. Grass-Types...that's an obvious "duh" when stopping Spore.

[quoteThe calcs i showed earlier shown Pokemon 2HKO/3HKO Amoonguss with powerful SE moves[/quote]

I hate to be THAT guy, but your calculations were a bit silly. To quote:

4 SpA Flash Fire Heatran Lava Plume vs. 252 HP / 252+ SpD Amoonguss: 270-320 (62.5 - 74%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (you have flash fire on)
252 Atk Life Orb Weavile Ice Punch vs. 252 HP / 252+ Def Amoonguss: 273-322 (63.1 - 74.5%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (weavile has so many counters, why would you stay in on him)
252 SpA Life Orb Protean Greninja Ice Beam vs. 252 HP / 252 SpD Amoonguss: 299-354 (69.2 - 81.9%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (can't switch in, unless you predict the water type move, but at least he can take the hit and put it to sleep)
252+ Atk Choice Band Huge Power Azumarill Ice Punch vs. 252 HP / 252+ Def Amoonguss: 270-318 (62.5 - 73.6%) -- guaranteed 2HKO after Black Sludge recovery (no azumarill runs ice punch! it is either knock off or superpower on their last move slot. amoonguss doesn't mind a knock off thanks to regenerator and superpower on him, isn't really that super).

I think this explains the silliness a bit.

but what if they have set up?!

GG, you lost.
No, I wouldn't be that cruel, but let's take this one a bit more seriously. Amoonguss is going to switch into a threat it knows it can tank, so when a set-up sweeper comes in, they take the Spore and Amoonguss switches out to another Pokemon. If a Pokemon HAS already set up, I don't expect even Mega Venusaur to be able to tank their most powerful attack. Once a Pokemon has completely set-up, there aren't many Pokemon (if any to begin with) that can wall them. Your only hope would be to sacrifice a Pokemon and Revenge Kill if possible.

The analysis for Ammooguss for OU, UU, and RU list Pokemon that can handle it well. Some of the Pokemon listed, like Crobat in the UU Analysis, are not even OU viable today.

I have fun when people like to bring up checks to Pokemon that are in lower tiers. Terrakion with Golurk, Tangrowth, and Claydol? Should the checks be OU and Terrakion be NU (let us never imagine this again...)? How about Shedinja against Kyogre? Each Pokemon has flaws; it's the team builder's job to make sure that each Pokemon support each other to make sure the synergy is as close to perfect as possible...at least in my eyes. I could just be a bad teambuilder...

As stated earlier:
"D Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who have a small niche in the current OU metagame, but have very noticable flaws that make them more trouble then their worth the majority of the time."
With that being said, Ammongus has very noticable flaws, with it's only use being to take hits and Recover, or use Spore/Cripple, and thus should be ranked no higher than C-/D, if not, no rank at all.

If you believe that Amoonguss should be given that kind of rank, all to you. I think Amoonguss more closely fits the C Rank, though.

OU Viability Thread said:
C Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who can be effective given the right support, but either have crippling flaws that prevent them from consistently executing their strategy or are completely eclipsed by a Pokemon in the above ranks.

Amoonguss can be effective when given the right support, with it being usable in a few teams. It has crippling flaws that does prevent it from consistently executing its strategy AND is eclipsed by Mega Venusaur. As I've stated before, I'll maintain my Amoonguss for C Rank, but I will not deny the flaws of Pokemon when it comes to ranking.

I have to say, this wasn't a post that overly bothered me. I've seen much lousier posts by much lousier people and the fact that you attempted thought with posting...you have a bit of respect from me.

ShadowMarioGalaxy64 Ulevo The problem is when we reach the point that things that have literally no niche and therefore no reason to be used, are being ranked. Amoonguss vs venusaur, darmanitan vs victini, kyurem vs kyurem black is not the same as florges vs sylveon. Amoonguss still has regenerator and doesnt eat a mega slot, darmanitan hits harder and doesnt suffer life orb recoil, kyurem has pressure+subroost. Florges however has no niche that sylveon doesnt fill better and is a clear example of something that should not be ranked ever. Thats also the reason the D rank is useless ''D Rank: Reserved for Pokemon who have a small niche in the current OU metagame, but have very noticable flaws that make them more trouble then their worth the majority of the time.'' If they are not worth the trouble most of the time then why would i ever want to use them and what exactly is the point of ranking them in first place? Maybe if we reach another ''dusclops in uu'' situation, where something is useless in the tier it is in but we have to rank it because it has enough usage to be part of said tier this rank could be useful but for now theres no reason for this to exist.

I never said anything about wanting Florges ranked (if anything, let it remain unranked), but I will say this: I brought up Pokemon barely anybody ran that had merits. Florges...it's entirely outclassed. Maybe it will get something new later...maybe not. Hard to say as is, but until then, Sylveon is fine where it is and Florges is fine where it isn't.
 
I agree. Pokemon such as Magnezone, although outclassed by other options, do have some viability in the OU tier to deserve a C-Rank. Magnet Pull came come in handy for trapping Scizor's without Superpower, and killing them off with HP Fire.

Other Pokemon, such as Florges, who has been stated many times to be outclassed by Sylveon, stilll has viability in OU. Sharing the same typing, and very similar stats/moves to Sylveon, Florges can play the same roles it can, as they can both wall Special Attackers that cannot harm them, with Florges having the disadvantage of poor abilities, low HP, and a limited movepool. With that in mind, they should also be checked/countered by the same Pokemon. If Florges truly is less viable than Sylveon, then there should be numerous amounts of OU threats that can check/counter it, while Sylveon can handle those same threats. So the big question is, what Pokemon checks/counters/walls Florges, but is unable to do the same to Sylveon? And vise versa? Some examples could be Blissey/Chansey, who can wall Florges, but because of Sylveon's access to Psyshock, have to be more careful. If this list is small, then Florges should be placed in a Rank below Sylveon, realistically being B-/C+/C. If the list is large, the Florges will be thrown in the D and under category and we can call it a day.

No. You compare don't compare Florges and Sylveon, or any other mons really, by the pokemon they can handle or what can handle them. You compare them by how well they can do their role, in this case of Florges and Sylveon, being a Tanky Cleric.

By definition of a Cleric, a mon that can support others, so obviously Wish-passing as well as healing statuses, Sylveon and Florges can do both but Sylveon does it slightly better cause of Sylveon's higher HP. So, right now, Sylveon > Florges. So far so good? Next,

Now we look at Sylveon's and Florges' other attributes that may help it with its role. Let's see, both have same typing(therefore same weakness/resists), both have more or less the same bulk with negligible differences. Clerics are known to be mono-attackers, and looking at their attacks, Sylveon hits harder with its Pixilate-Hyper Voice(not to mention going throug subs) than Florges' Moonblast. But Florges can carry Enery Ball while Sylveon can carry Shadow Ball/Psyshock, but this is a moot point as this does not help Florges and Sylveon with their primary role, which is being a tanky cleric. Therefore, Sylveon completely outclasses Florges in its main role. Florges doesn't have any other niche/unique trait that is viable in OU. Therefore, there is no viable reason for Florges to be ranked.

Now I will revert to Amoonguss vs. MSaur argument. Both are used as tanks/walls. One of the inherent traits that are needed for both is bulk, which MSaur has more of than Amoonguss. Another requirement would be recovery. Both have more or less the same movepool for recovery, but MSaur can't hold an item while Amoonguss can(Leftovers), as well as Amoonguss' Regenerator ability. Both have the same typing, but MSaur' ability in Thick Fat reduces it's weakness to just Psychic and Flying. Also, MSaur costs a mega-slot.

Now, comparing them side-by-side, MSaur completely outclasses Amoonguss bulk-wise. However, Amoonguss has more recovery power + it doesn't cost a mega-slot. Therefore, MSaur does not completely outclass Amoonguss, by the virtue of Amoonguss having a viable, unique niche/trait that MSaur doesn't have(recovery+not costing a megaslot). Therefore, Amoonguss is worthy of ranking.
 
Just because something is completely outclassed by something else does not mean it is not viable. It means you shouldn't use it. Those things are actually different. A pokemon is viable if it can be used to reasonable effect, which florges actually can, even if there is NO excuse for using it whatsoever.
.
No, this is wrong. Outclassed mons should only be ranked if they have something over their opposition. Florgres has literally nothing useful over Sylveon. they have almost identical movepools, but sylveons is better offensively and it takes hits overall better. Florgres only should be considered over sylveon in doubles where its ability gets use, but even so Sylveon should still do better than it. We do not want to give people the idea that certain pokemon are OK to use when Florgres is NOT ok to use as it is outclassed in every single possible way by a single pokemon alone and it gets nothing over that pokemon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top