Apologies for a somewhat late reply.I believe if you didn't memory link some NPC still reference the previous playable character but they don't say their name and use gender neutral words like "kid" and "child".
And Memory Link was pretty neat with people saying our names and talking about us.
What was exactly wrong with the PokeGear? I can't really think how its any different from the PokeNav or C-Gear. Personally my favorite additional device was the Poketch with all the apps that it had, though the PokeNav Plus is probably going to replace it once Gen VI is over. I found the C-Gear kind of dull with the only use it had was for entering the Entralink to get my Dream World Pokemon & items.
Play Rough is 90% Accuracy? Why? It's only 90 Power and just has a 10 percent chance of doing its secondary effect which is a stat decrease. You know GF this is maybe why you think Special attacks are overpowered, because you're making the Physical attacks stink! And I get it, being you're physically attacking an opponent that technically means they have a better chance of dodging... but that's what evasion is for. Only time a move should have less than perfect accuracy is if they're very powerful with little/no negative effect or it has a really powerful/useful effect.
I see, that's how I thought it was (didn't play through B2/W2 without Memory Link).
And I agree, I also liked Memory Link a lot, it added some more small things to make a fantastic game even better. If there are more sequels in the future, I hope it makes a return. But that doesn't belong here.
What I found wrong with it was that it did the same things as the other gadgets do, but it didn't do them well. Having to cycle through menus every time you wanted to check the map was annoying, especially when trying to hunt down roamers. It was better in D/P/P where you could simply have the map at the bottom screen all the time. The PokeGear had a clock, but didn't display time all the time, unlike the Poketch and C-Gear, forcing you to go through menus once again. Or I could have been less lazy and just used my wristwatch. The style switcher was fine but nothing to write home about. I found the C-gear to do this better. The Phone was hit and miss, it was useful for some things like rebattling trainers (but that should have been much better) and it also had purposes while RNGing. But it was annoying to get useless calls from random trainers which in my opinion happened way too often.
I actually liked the Poketch too. And the C-gear as well (I guess this is unpopular?). I liked the features it had like connecting to the Dream World, going to the Entralink, using Pass Powers, doing Entralink and Funfest Missions, being able to switch skin (not anymore, sadly) and it displayed time at all times - even in battle! Wish 6th gen had kept that... Not sure if I would say the C-gear is my favorite though, but I really like it at least. No opinion on the Pokenav+ yet, might give one in the future once I have tried it for myself.
Forgot about the 10% chance of lowering defense, it never really happened to me because when I used Play Rough and it hit, it pretty much always KO'd stuff. I agree with all else you said about it.
Conkeldurr is, and will always remain, a bleak attempt at making Machamp over again. And it's a poor design, to boot.
That goes for pretty exactly half of the Unova dex too, actually. The latter half of the roster is filled with pretty creative and original designs. The first half is just trash and clones of designs we already saw in the previous generations. You could replace half of Gen. V with existing designs, and I doubt I'd even notice.
You are entitled to your opinion, but this is hardly unpopular. I have seen this exact argument repeated over and over at various Pokemon forums hundreds of times for the past ~4 years. And what's more, I disagree with you, which I believe is actually unpopular. Even if 5th gen isn't as hated now as it was in the past, it still gets unfair shares of hate here and there.
Conkeldurr is not "a bleak attempt at making Machamp over again", nor is it a poor design. I find it to be a really great design (considerably better than Machamp, which is a Pokemon I also like), and while Conkeldurr shares some similarities with Machamp, there are many differences between them. They are based on different concepts and have different designs, and they perform different roles in battle.
Likewise, none of the Unova Pokemon are "clones" of any old Pokemon. If anything, some of them are paying homages to Pokemon from older generations. Some Unova Pokemon have some similarities to older Pokemon but they are very different from each other when it comes down to the very core, which means they are not clones. I find all of the Pokemon from Unova to be creative, unique, innovative and interesting. I don't find any of them to be trash (apart from Trubbish/Garbodor, but that is in a literal and good way). I'm happy that Gen 5 introduced so many new Pokemon because that's just what I wanted from the franchise at that point, as opposed to another game with nothing but Kanto Pokemon everywhere and anywhere.
I'm not saying you are wrong or that you are not allowed to have your opinion on this subject. I just disagree with you.