Unpopular opinions

I'm probably a rarity that I've played since Gen 1, but Gen 7 is my favorite generation.

Alola to me had the best story/characters, great Pokemon/Trainer designs, and really fun competitively. It also has the largest selection of Pokemon for any generation, had great wifi play options, and good systems for training up your team to what you want for online. The Sun/Moon anime is also probably the most fun the series has been in forever, they really went wild.
 
I don't like the big new menu sprites.

Firstly, there's that a size disparity exists at all. One of the main reasons the menu sprites exist is to be laid out on a grid (in the PC box), so having an inconsistent size looks really clunky.

Secondly, I don't like the selection process for the larger sprites. It's not great for what it picks as "fully evolved" when looking at crossgen evolutions (e.g. linoone-Hoenn is small despite being incapable of evolving), and it brings the series historic inability to get sizes right to a new format (why is 40cm bellossom shown larger than 200 cm wailmer?). As someone who plays for the interesting combinations, it also bothers me when a NFE that fulfills a different niche as its evolution (e.g. Dusclops) is labeled as 'lesser' solely because of being related to a mon doing something else.

I also don't have any that I think look that much better than the old ones, but that's not a conceptual problem.
To me, while they look good from an artistic standpoint, there are two issues where I feel the old sprites are better:

First, you mentioned the size disparity, but GF seems to have been bizarrely inconsistent in doling out the big sprites. You mentioned Linoone, but then you have Farfetch’d, which has a tiny Kanto-form sprite and a big Galar-form sprite, while Mr. Mime has big sprites in both forms. And then all the Alolan forms have tiny sprites... except, for whatever reason, Marowak and Exeggutor, which have two big sprites.

Second, this isn’t a problem unique to Gen 8, but does anyone else miss the animated menu sprites of Gens 3-5? I feel they gave the menu a bit more character then the ones in Gen 6 onwards, even if the latter were more accurate.
 
Second, this isn’t a problem unique to Gen 8, but does anyone else miss the animated menu sprites of Gens 3-5? I feel they gave the menu a bit more character then the ones in Gen 6 onwards, even if the latter were more accurate.
Eh, old menu sprites suffered color limits of all sharing 3 palettes, since GBA was limited to 16 palettes for dynamic objects, and they needed extra for menu themes. Hence odd colored ones
 
Gen1 player here who really liked Kalos. Not challenging enough, but they made an effort to put a lot of different pokes early, which is so big for replayability. Most games you get early route normal/bird/bug/monotype, a cave or forest with about 4 mons, and that's it for variety until the second gym. In Kalos you've got 4 routes with a decent variety of unique mons per route before gym 1.
 
Regarding favorite generations and nostalgia, I think I have posted my thoughts on this before but I’ll post them again since the topic came up once more. This whole thing about someone's first generation also being their favorite doesn’t apply to me because I started with Gen 1, but my favorite is Gen 5. While I have many positive memories from Gen 1, I don’t care much for it anymore and I actually find it overrated nowadays. The extreme focus it has gotten in many other generations (notably Gen 2 and 7, but also 6 and 8 as well as 3 and 4 to various extents) has also made my feelings towards it more sour. In comparison, Gen 5 is my favorite because it is the generation I had the most fun playing. It is not my favorite because of nostalgia because I don’t find it old enough to feel nostalgic for… yet. It is getting closer, though. It will be 10 years since the English release of B/W in just two months... where did all these years go? Time flies.

Anyway the real reason I’m posting here is because I came up with a some new unpopular opinions, so here they are.

I have never understood the hype for Goomy or Snom. While those are fine Pokémon, I don’t think there’s anything really special or unique about them.
First, we have Goomy. Gen 6 introduced many great Pokémon, but while the fandom at large seemed to fall in love with Goomy, I have personally never cared much for it. In fact, I like the majority of the other Gen 6 Pokémon better than the Goomy line. I’m not a huge fan of slimy things, so that’s probably the main reason. I have also never found Goodra to have any unique or special niche in battle, something I feel that all other pseudo-legendaries have. I have used Goodra twice on two different teams, and while I liked it a bit better afterwards, it is still my least favorite pseudo-legendary without any doubt.
Then there’s Snom. Apparently, this is one of the most popular Pokémon from Gen 8? I don’t get it. While I think it is fine, there are many similar small Bug Pokémon which I like about equally or better than it. For me, the best thing about Snom is that it evolves into the much more awesome Frosmoth which is an awesome Pokémon with a cool design.

One discussion that seems to pop up rather often is whether the 2D sprites or 3D models are better for Pokémon. My possibly unpopular opinion here is that I liked both the sprites and the models. I think the sprites were really good, especially in Gen 5. Gen 4 & 3 had several good ones too, and I think even Gen 1 & 2 had some sprites that were pretty good. But I like the 3D models too. I think they mostly did a great job with them in the 3DS games, but I like them even better in Gen 8, the Switch allows them to really shine. While there are both sprites and models that could have been even better, I still like both in the end.

I don’t think D/P are the worst Pokémon games. I won’t deny that they have issues, but I think they had a large number of positives too. New and awesome Pokémon, good training spots, a great post-game, the P/S split, better movepools for most Pokémon, and I think Sinnoh is a really great region, my second favorite after Unova. On the whole, I think I’d rank D/P somewhere in the middle if I were to rank the main series Pokémon games. I would place them right below S/M, which is interesting since I feel that those two pairs are very similar to each other in many ways. If anything, the big problem for D/P is not necessarily that they are bad, but rather that they are obsolete. There’s no reason to play them now when Platinum exists. But even so, I still think they were good for their time, I had tons of fun with them back in 2007-08. With that said, my least favorite Pokémon games are still a certain pair from Gen 4… but it isn’t D/P.

Not sure if this is unpopular, but this is something I wanted to say anyway. I think I have partly said it before, but I might as well say it again. As stated earlier in this post, Gen 5 is my favorite. B/W & B2/W2 are my favorite Pokémon games. But… I don’t want it to stay that way. Ever since the end of Gen 5, I have wanted a new generation and new games to take their place and become my new favorite Pokémon games. But that has yet to happen. I think the ones that got the closest so far were X/Y which are awesome games, but they didn’t quite reach the top. I really want the series to move forward instead of backward, which is what I feel that it has been doing in recent years, starting with Gen 6 and then sadly continuing from there with almost every new game release. In the past, I wanted both Gen 6 & 7 to become my new favorites, but it didn't happen, and by Gen 8, I had sort of given up on the whole idea.

I guess the above is also partly tied to why remakes are my least favorite type of Pokémon games. If there were to be new remakes of an older game pair (for example, D/P remakes for Gen 8) and those would turn out better than the main games of the generation, then I think that would be a bad sign for Pokémon on the whole. Because if the best game of a generation is a remake, what does that say about the quality of the new generation? To me, it would say that the quality of the new games are not very good and that an older generation is better, as the remakes have shown by being better than the new games. Fortunately, this has yet to happen as I do not personally think that any of the remakes we have gotten so far have been the best games of their respective generation.
 
Alola to me had the best story/characters, great Pokemon/Trainer designs, and really fun competitively. It also has the largest selection of Pokemon for any generation, had great wifi play options, and good systems for training up your team to what you want for online. The Sun/Moon anime is also probably the most fun the series has been in forever, they really went wild.

This definitely seems to be an unpopular opinion, especially judging from what I've seen online, but I concur. It's an opinion I wholeheartedly with. The generation seven games are severely underrated in my opinion for the reasons you've pointed out. Yes, the hand holding was annoying, but as you say, it arguably has the best story in the franchise, second to BW, a great selection of Pokemon, great online options, a very unique region design, they look fantastic given the limitations of the 3DS and it was made easier than ever to make a competitive team. I also appreciated the efforts they went to to do something other than the gym system. Although granted what we got were bascially gyms in disguise. But nevertheless, island trials did actually make you think and strategise somewhat. Although the wifi options were great, I'm sure I don't need to expand on this, but one gripe I do have is that festival plaza left much to be desired and was definitely a step down from the PSS system in my view.

I'm not sure if this one is an unpopular opinion so I'm kinda testing the waters here (pun intended), but I strongly believe that the peak of Pokemon design came in generation three. Like seriously, everytime I go back and look over the Hoenn Pokedex there's barely a single Pokemon that's a dud to me. Such a fantastic roster of well designed and thought out Pokemon. My personal favourite generation for example, gen 5, arguably has a LOT of, and if not more objectively, stellar designs, but equally it also has quite a number of truly horrendous ones. Hoenn for me on the other hand just has an extremely consistently well designed set of mons. Although as stated above, I'd be interested to see if this is actually an unpopular opinion.
 
Last edited:
Hoenn for me on the other hand just has an extremely consistently well designed set of mons
And then we had this....
castform.jpg

But yeah, 3 is my top for mon designs along with 1
 
I'm not sure if this one is an unpopular opinion so I'm kinda testing the waters here (pun intended), but I strongly believe that the peak of Pokemon design came in generation three. Like seriously, everytime I go back and look over the Hoenn Pokedex there's barely a single Pokemon that's a dud to me. Such a fantastic roster of well designed and thought out Pokemon. My personal favourite generation for example, gen 5, arguably has a LOT of, and if not more objectively, stellar designs, but equally it also has quite a number of truly horrendous ones. Hoenn for me on the other hand just has an extremely consistently well designed set of mons. Although as stated above, I'd be interested to see if this is actually an unpopular opinion.

I think a lot of people would very subtly agree with this, and you can tell just how good Gen 3's roster of Pokemon is by how immensely popular many Gen 3 Pokemon are. The Hoenn starters are by far the most beloved set of starters to date aside from maybe the Kanto starters and Greninja. Sceptile, Blaziken, and Swampert are universally extremely popular and soooo many people love those three. Even their base forms are well known as well (and we all know Mudkip has achieved meme popularity). Beyond the starters though, you have a ton of iconic Pokemon in the fanbase. There's Gardevoir, Aggron, Flygon, Absol, Milotic, and of course Salamence and Metagross as standouts who have massively popular fanbases. Kyogre, Groudon, and Rayquaza are also arguably among the most well received cover legendaries of the lot. Let's not forget how well known the Regis and Latis are, the Regis so much so that we got Regigigas a gen later and even as of late new members to the Regi group.

While the likes of Gens 1 and 2 had a whole lot of dud/not good Pokemon, Gen 3 by far has the biggest fanbase in terms of its Pokemon. Pretty much everyone at least knows many of those Pokemon and there are many of those that have become memorable and iconic over the years and are massive fan faves. It's true that as much as I love say, Gens 4 and 5, even they don't have as many Pokemon that have reached the level of iconic that many Gen 3 Pokemon have achieved.
 
I think a lot of people would very subtly agree with this, and you can tell just how good Gen 3's roster of Pokemon is by how immensely popular many Gen 3 Pokemon are. The Hoenn starters are by far the most beloved set of starters to date aside from maybe the Kanto starters and Greninja. Sceptile, Blaziken, and Swampert are universally extremely popular and soooo many people love those three. Even their base forms are well known as well (and we all know Mudkip has achieved meme popularity). Beyond the starters though, you have a ton of iconic Pokemon in the fanbase. There's Gardevoir, Aggron, Flygon, Absol, Milotic, and of course Salamence and Metagross as standouts who have massively popular fanbases. Kyogre, Groudon, and Rayquaza are also arguably among the most well received cover legendaries of the lot. Let's not forget how well known the Regis and Latis are, the Regis so much so that we got Regigigas a gen later and even as of late new members to the Regi group.

While the likes of Gens 1 and 2 had a whole lot of dud/not good Pokemon, Gen 3 by far has the biggest fanbase in terms of its Pokemon. Pretty much everyone at least knows many of those Pokemon and there are many of those that have become memorable and iconic over the years and are massive fan faves. It's true that as much as I love say, Gens 4 and 5, even they don't have as many Pokemon that have reached the level of iconic that many Gen 3 Pokemon have achieved.

Well I guess that answers that then. But seriously, thanks for the insightful response. It makes me happy that my love for Hoenn's Pokedex seems to be shared by a large proportion of the fanbase.
 
Salamance's design is definitely on the lower end for me
No I don't care about the Devilman ref, the wings look like cardboard
Similarly, Volbeat's nose ruins it compared to Illumise who lacks it
And Taillow's beak, though the sprite in RSE hides that. Sadly based on Finches in general having really wide beaks
Otherwise that's it for me for dislikes. I like Castform's other forms a lot better than default
 
Gen 3 Hoenn had a lot of great mon designs. I gotta stan Gen 4 tho. Especially Starter-wise. Best trio. Hoenn is definitely up there tho.

Gen 6 Hoenn had a bunch of Megas that... ain't it. Manectric is just ridiculous, Sharpedo is also straight-up silly, and Salamence is literally a joke.

All is forgiven tho, they gave my boy Gallade a cape. :swole:
 
Me

Stupid 2% encounter rate, garbage stats, pincushion-looking tail

Every Pokemon is liked by somebody. Even if its line is garbage in battle it's a wonderful Contest Pokemon if you're into those as a Coordinator. It has a great movepool for contests, especially the Cute category if you're playing the Hoenn games. Its evolution Delcatty is also a great partner for any Coordinator to have and use in contest performances.

It's all about what you're looking for in a Pokemon, so even Pokemon that aren't liked by competitive players for their lack of usefulness or even impracticality in battles in either competitive or in-game playthroughs can still be liked by some people for other reasons, especially if battling aspect is not of their priority. Everyone has different tastes for different reasons, in many cases purely for aesthetic reasons as well.
 
Must a Pokemon have "stats" and a "movepool"? Is it not enough for it to be cute and pink? :puff:
We already had several of those in Gen 1, two of which also evolved with a Moon Stone, and two of which have actual stats that still see use in competitive play.

I don't actually hate Skitty but its design doesn't do anything for me, and the line seems to add several needlessly difficult aspects together (rare encounter, stone evolution) to no real reward. When they gave its signature move to other Pokémon, well, that kinda removes any real incentive I would ever have to use it.
 
garchomp is ugly as hell

Definitely agree with this, never really understood the hype behind this guy design wise (ok, maybe I did when I was like 7 but my opinion has changed since then). Maybe this is controversial, but I think Gible is a far better design. I also think that many pseudo first stage mons in general have some of the best designs in the series, with some argubly almost or on par with their final evos. For example, we've got Larvitar, Gible, Deino, Bagon, Goomy and Dreepy to name a few, all of which have phenomenal designs imo. Come to think of it, I would say there's a number of regular first stage (and second stage in a few cases) mons that I prefer or at least hold in as high of a regard as their final stage. Some examples off the top of my head would be, Sandshrew, Numel, Phanpy, Totodile, Trapinch, Bulbasaur, Swinub, Grovyle, Shellos, Litwick, Wooper, Oddish, Spheal, Staryu, Joltik, Lotad, Venipede, Deerling, Shinx, Scyther, Solosis, Gligar and Haunter.
 
Back
Top