?? lolSo what's the alternative? Letting children without parents die on the streets?
there are in fact options aside from 'keep the current adoption system as is with marginally increased funding' and 'let children die in the streets' (which may be more like what we currently have than one would think).
is the 'concept' of adoption unethical? to me it seems like any circumstance that has come about in which a child is taken away from its birth family should be looked at w at least a bit of scrutiny. for example, if it was found that the children of native americans were being widely adopted by white settlers that would probably be something to think about a little bit. from these things i have said it would seem that the concept of adoption is itself defined by a certain type of ambiguity about how to redress the original 'wrong', i.e that the parent and child are separated.
if you read just a bit further you would notice I have indeed provided an article on the topic, recommend reading it.Do you have any proof of this or are just making this up out of nothing because it fits in with your preconceived beliefs?