Id recomend everyone reading this to test natdex, a meta Witithout ghold, or at least watch replays, to understand How bad the argument was. gliscor is a consustent hazard setter that can spread status And koff the opponent, While Not being so passive thanks to eq. this, is gliscor, okay? I Cant gET Why people sAY gliscor is Good Cause it has many sets And a large movepool when offensive sets are Simply outclassed in this meta? Ban gholdengo would unironically fix the meta, If you want a more balanced neta, alongside With ursa-b And sneasler mostly. The issue is The playerbase that cannot think about long-term as they Have Never did, And The fact that gliscor is a cool mon so it is more exploited than others. ghold dodging a ban would be sign of a playerbase that maybe needs more knowledge of The meta or maybe a sign that reqs should be higher (no offense) to Have The advice of experienced players. But, again, expériences players may Not want what's better for The metaas they'd want to abuse their toy to be Even higher on ladder. I think surveys should Not be a way for The playerbase to decide as The playerbase is objectively flawed(no offense) And I think more power should be given to the council as I did contested bans the council made before realising it was the right décision.