Metagame SV OU Metagame Discussion v3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gliscor is still banworthy even if Gholdengo is removed
this is the speech of a madman that Lost to glisc due to the lack of special attackers in its team. really, tinglu imo is better at setting hazards but gliscor And dengo are gpod in hazards stack. ghold IS the problem here, And everyone saying otherwise should reconsider And take an objective look Not only a "gliscor is bad, it beats my fav mon, my fav mon is sudowoodo" so I think glisc Will be A/A+ in the vr MAXIMUM After ghold ban.
 
I find it kind of crazy that Cyrogonal is being brought up as a fun little antimeta tech months after Morkal first made a post about. With several potential sets, even. Love shit like this and it's only possible thanks to Tera.
Yeah I guess tera's mostly negative impact does lead to some positive impacts, at least because some pretty otherwise bad pokemon can get anti meta stuff
 
sir, most players wont understand the cancer that that engine can give in master duel when the pack first released.
anyways, this is pokemon and not yugioh, we didn't come here to talk about cards
master duel format would still suck shit even without the adventure package, but you're right about what we're here to talk about.

this format sucks shit
 
this is the speech of a madman that Lost to glisc due to the lack of special attackers in its team. really, tinglu imo is better at setting hazards but gliscor And dengo are gpod in hazards stack. ghold IS the problem here, And everyone saying otherwise should reconsider And take an objective look Not only a "gliscor is bad, it beats my fav mon, my fav mon is sudowoodo" so I think glisc Will be A/A+ in the vr MAXIMUM After ghold ban.
the fact that the pro-gliscor camp is making arguments like this is proof that the mon needs to go
 
I don't want to post a one liner but like, What you mean?
your argument states that people who want gliscor banned are idiots who can't figure out their way around it, are incapable of being objective, and run sudowoodo in ou. is that really the best you can bring to the table? accusing the vast majority of qualified survey voters of bias? do you believe that there's some sort of vast hidden conspiracy to unjustly ban gliscor and keep gholdengo? to paraphrase your own words, "what else do you believe? that nobody landed on the moon, that earth is flat, that crocodiles rule the world?"
 
Last edited:
It had Crunch. Knock Off is great, but you mean 17.5 Base Power + Item removal took a mon from UUBL usage to Ubers in a few short weeks?

Moon had untapped potential that flew under the radar was my original point.

To be fair, pre-DLC1 there was a pretty hefty opportunity cost to running moon. As a physical dragon dancer that liked tera, it competed with Baxcalibur. As a physical dark sweeper that liked tera it competed with Gambit. Some teams could afford to stack multiples of these mons but there were many that couldn’t.

Knock was huge for moon because it let it reliably punish switchins, particularly to remove rocky helmets from mons like Dozo/Corv or lefties/boots from Gambit, making them easier to deal with either immediately or later in the game.
 
your argument states that people who want gliscor banned are idiots who can't figure out their way around it, are incapable of being objective, and run sudowoodo in ou. is that really the best you can bring to the table? accusing the vast majority of qualified survey voters of bias?
Id recomend everyone reading this to test natdex, a meta Witithout ghold, or at least watch replays, to understand How bad the argument was. gliscor is a consustent hazard setter that can spread status And koff the opponent, While Not being so passive thanks to eq. this, is gliscor, okay? I Cant gET Why people sAY gliscor is Good Cause it has many sets And a large movepool when offensive sets are Simply outclassed in this meta? Ban gholdengo would unironically fix the meta, If you want a more balanced neta, alongside With ursa-b And sneasler mostly. The issue is The playerbase that cannot think about long-term as they Have Never did, And The fact that gliscor is a cool mon so it is more exploited than others. ghold dodging a ban would be sign of a playerbase that maybe needs more knowledge of The meta or maybe a sign that reqs should be higher (no offense) to Have The advice of experienced players. But, again, expériences players may Not want what's better for The metaas they'd want to abuse their toy to be Even higher on ladder. I think surveys should Not be a way for The playerbase to decide as The playerbase is objectively flawed(no offense) And I think more power should be given to the council as I did contested bans the council made before realising it was the right décision.
 
Id recomend everyone reading this to test natdex
Didn't I already point out why this is stupid not 24 hours ago? Natdex is an OM with extremely different rules, power level, available options, tiering philosophy, people running it, people playing it,and basically everything else. You can use it to get a really, really, really broad strokes impression of how something might work in OU, but the meta is so different that it's incomparable.

Volcarona is Natdex UU last I checked, but here it's Ubers. Is it the OU playerbase's fault for not adapting to it then?
 
Id recomend everyone reading this to test natdex, a meta Witithout ghold, or at least watch replays, to understand How bad the argument was. gliscor is a consustent hazard setter that can spread status And koff the opponent, While Not being so passive thanks to eq. this, is gliscor, okay? I Cant gET Why people sAY gliscor is Good Cause it has many sets And a large movepool when offensive sets are Simply outclassed in this meta? Ban gholdengo would unironically fix the meta, If you want a more balanced neta, alongside With ursa-b And sneasler mostly. The issue is The playerbase that cannot think about long-term as they Have Never did, And The fact that gliscor is a cool mon so it is more exploited than others. ghold dodging a ban would be sign of a playerbase that maybe needs more knowledge of The meta or maybe a sign that reqs should be higher (no offense) to Have The advice of experienced players. But, again, expériences players may Not want what's better for The metaas they'd want to abuse their toy to be Even higher on ladder. I think surveys should Not be a way for The playerbase to decide as The playerbase is objectively flawed(no offense) And I think more power should be given to the council as I did contested bans the council made before realising it was the right décision.
list of defoggers in natdex ou, according to the 1630 stats:
  • lando-t
  • mega scizor
  • zapdos
  • tapu koko
  • gliscor its own fucking self
  • moltres
  • corviknight
  • pelipper
  • rotom-wash
  • if we want to include other defoggers on the vr that aren't in natdex ou by usage, we can also add kartana, tornadus-therian, serperior, tapu fini, ribombee, empoleon, hydreigon, skarmory, mega latias, mega latios, and hawlucha
  • blaziken, dragonite, and the megazards also have access to defog but never run it because natdex is up to its fucking eyeballs in defoggers, to the point where 80% of gliscors don't even bother running spikes
list of defoggers in a theoretical gholdless ou:
  • corviknight
  • maybe mandibuzz?
  • galarian weezing and scizor would at least be on the vr
lack of gholdengo is not the difference that makes gliscor more manageable in natdex
 
Last edited:
list of defoggers in natdex ou, according to the 1630 stats:
  • lando-t
  • mega scizor
  • zapdos
  • tapu koko, which runs it on a non-negligible percentage of sets even at a detriment to its own terrain—that's a sign that people are a bit desperate for anti-hazard tech over there too
  • gliscor its own fucking self
  • moltres
  • corviknight
  • pelipper
  • rotom-wash
list of defoggers in a theoretical gholdless ou:
  • corviknight
  • maybe mandibuzz?
lack of gholdengo is not the difference that makes gliscor more manageable in natdex
I agree with this general sentiment but I feel like people are counting out our boy Scizor as a defogger, esp when there are two prominent frail as shit fast fairy types being used on quite a number of teams that do not appreciate Technician Bullet Punch.
 
I agree with this general sentiment but I feel like people are counting out our boy Scizor as a defogger, esp when there are two prominent frail as shit fast fairy types being used on quite a number of teams that do not appreciate Technician Bullet Punch.
that's true, but i initially was thinking only of "ou by usage". extending it to things like scizor that are viable but not ou by usage actually strengthens my point because natdex has a bunch of other defoggers sitting in uu and below that are still on the ou vr there. you end up with something like 20 viable defoggers in natdex altogether and maybe 4 in ou
 
Something to keep in mind is that whatever hazard situation natdex was going through was SIGNIFICANTLY better than OU's current hazard situation. Even when Ghold was legal, most teams I saw ran 2 boots users at most with maybe a Lando-T or Rotom-W for good measure. I saw very few 6 Boots squads outside of, like, stall maybe. Mons like Rotom-W and Lando-T still would get the Defog off most games, albeit Roton-W had to go a more offensive route with Nasty Plot Hydro Vortex.
 
i'm just gonna say it, anyone who votes for tera to be gone just doesn't want their pokemon to have drip- like look at how cool their hats are, you're telling me you REALLY wanna get rid of them??!??! for SHAME!

View attachment 567666
this is what tera deniers are trying to prevent your playerbase from having!!! wake up, sheeple!!!
if tera is banned, there should be a "dudunsparce clause" that allows dudunsparce to tera anyway
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top