inhales
there specifically to indicate that it was me - there's not really any point in posting in a quiet thread with a 4-odd line post that doesn't actually add anything of value. the haha react isn't at the fact that you're nomming blissey, it's at the over-the-top language for one mon on an OM vr.
regarding the health, most people don't bother going to 703 because of a mixture of simply not remembering that it's a thing and that the 1 hp damage is usually inconsequential. the argument is then 704 vs 714 - while blissey has the 10 hp advantage if you aren't running eviolite, it's ultimately a value judgment as to whether the potential to mindgame your opponent is worth the 10 hp - it usually is in my opinion.
little tangent to when i was first learning bh in gen 8, i made an aerilate rayquaza set with boomburst/espeed/v-create/sap life orb (this already existed before, but people had sort of just forgotten about it). i posted it in OMcord, and one of the first responses i got was "why couldn't this be a yveltal"? it sounded silly at first, given that yveltal's triage set was arguably much better, but upon thinking about it i realized that there wasn't really much point in not being yveltal - just because triage was better didn't mean that this aerilate set was somehow worse, and it benefitted from most yveltals either being nasty plot triage or boots aerilate spin. the takeaway from this would be that just because a mon isn't using "arguably the best set" doesn't mean alternative sets are automatically bad - that's my point here with chansey running different items than eviolite. eviolite is the best, but that doesn't automatically mean the others are bad or less valuable.
"And you still keep pretending the 18% PR usage at top ranks of Blissey is not even worth a rank, let alone a B-one, despite clearly proving herself so many times to be a solid pokémon with reasons to be used over Chansey OR WITH, which is enough of a reason to rank a pokémon btw, even if outclassed in most cases or even all cases."
with the aggressive tone, exaggerated capital letters, etc. then i'm instantly finding it harder to take you seriously, since i'm now having to decide if this is a ragepost or actual criticism. just a formal nomination or a "hey, i think you missed blissey / the other imposter items" or something would be much easier for both of us to work with.
if you couldn't tell, i left theTea Guzzler, I know it's you who edited my post; I didn't knew you have those admin powers though. And I knew you weren't taking me seriously because you reacted with a laugh; No one who takes a post seriously reacts to it with a laugh.

psychological warfare is always an iffy point because there's no way of measuring it. however, the main benefit of having chansey is that the default position is that it's eviolite - when you haven't been able to confirm it, the default position is to play as if the chansey is eviolite, which can put you in a really dodgy position if you do something that's supposed to beat eviolite but hard loses to x other item (eg. setting up with SNR lunala against a spooky plate chansey). using the blob to improof an ally is only ever feasible when said ally is a pretty weak special attacker if you don't have eviolite (something like boosting etern is off the table without evio for example), but even in these cases, chansey being slower and having less attack is arguably a good thing, since it gives away less strength sap recovery and has the slower pivoting (and min speed chansey also increases the chance that an opposing imposter transforms into it, thus you know the enemy's exact capabilities if you both lead imp turn 1 - blissey will always outspeed chansey and thus can't do this).Also, Is it really that valuable to make the opponent not know what the item is? I genuinely doubt it, because:
- We're talking about using the pink blobs. Anyone knows/expects they're imposters when alone, specially because they're very popular as leads (I know the last one because of the tournament data). You're not playing imposter Chansey or Blissey for the surprise factor, is for the safety one. If anything Blissey has better surprise factor due to some people trying to use sets other than imposter.
- Good players can figure out eviolite with a singular damage roll anyways because it's their pokémon what they're copying; eviolite just gives too high of a boost to not be noticed, like choiced items. Again, the surprise factor isn't really something of much value with Chansey unlike other pokémon in BH.
- You're losing more than just 10 health, you're losing 11 (To take less from all the passive damage going around you should get only 703 HP. No idea why almost no one is doing it at top level in a meta full of stone axe, mortal spin and salt cure), and also becoming unable to switch safely into passive damage if going eviolite.
- In case of knock off or without eviolite Chansey is just a worse Blissey; can't use special attacks, it's frailer and slower. While indeed Chansey would have lost more health, it's common for them to overheal with Strenght sap and regenerator, which does put a good emphasis to base bulk despite all the chip damage.
regarding the health, most people don't bother going to 703 because of a mixture of simply not remembering that it's a thing and that the 1 hp damage is usually inconsequential. the argument is then 704 vs 714 - while blissey has the 10 hp advantage if you aren't running eviolite, it's ultimately a value judgment as to whether the potential to mindgame your opponent is worth the 10 hp - it usually is in my opinion.
this is correct - when chansey's best item is eviolite and blissey doesn't have it, eviolite becomes a massive selling point for chansey.There's only one logical conclussion here then, considering there's no surprise in imposter or eviolite chansey: The reason to run Chansey over Blissey is eviolite.
According to Smogon's data over 97% of Chansey games have her with eviolite and over 96% imposter. Chansey has a pressense of 68% btw, while Blissey still has 18%. Also, Blissey only pairs with Chansey 34% of the time.
What do I mean with this? Well, basically that the whole "Chansey vs Blissey" thing is more about "What item should my imposter use?"
I agree with you that eviolite Chansey is USUALLY the best imposter, but that doesn't mean every single time as an unranked would suggest; sometimes you do need to proof your team against an Arceus form or the resiliance against chip damage, something Chansey just does worse than Blissey.
little tangent to when i was first learning bh in gen 8, i made an aerilate rayquaza set with boomburst/espeed/v-create/sap life orb (this already existed before, but people had sort of just forgotten about it). i posted it in OMcord, and one of the first responses i got was "why couldn't this be a yveltal"? it sounded silly at first, given that yveltal's triage set was arguably much better, but upon thinking about it i realized that there wasn't really much point in not being yveltal - just because triage was better didn't mean that this aerilate set was somehow worse, and it benefitted from most yveltals either being nasty plot triage or boots aerilate spin. the takeaway from this would be that just because a mon isn't using "arguably the best set" doesn't mean alternative sets are automatically bad - that's my point here with chansey running different items than eviolite. eviolite is the best, but that doesn't automatically mean the others are bad or less valuable.
i own this thread but the VR isn't just my opinions - everyone on council pools their opinions on the vr, given current meta and nominations people have made in this thread justifying rises/drops, and we literally have a spreadsheet where we put the votes. short answer is that blissey simply wasn't considered at the time we were making the VR, which was before that last round - this is also why other imp items like cloak and spooky plate are absent, as the people that rate them high simply forgot (pretty much everyone on council except me), and the terminal non-evio imp haters (me) just didn't bother nomming what i see as a meh at best mon. this is going to be biased, of course it is, because people don't tend to make their voices heard in formal posts like the ones on this thread, and collecting data en-masse via a survey or something is just infeasible given time constraints.As a moderator of this tournament you also should know about the last week, where the three winners used Blissey to win, one being Augustakira who I quoted earlier. Let remind you we're right now on top 12 and is a money tournament, they would have literal 0 reason to use unviable pokémon...
And that's my problem with the tier list you're showing, is excessively stiff in terms of "what's viable" in a tier where the main limit is creativity and ridiculous powermoves. This ranking feels too, subjective and personal, rather than something who is actually looking the data with some small bias, it feels like bias with maybe some light looking at data, despite proving her value in way too many games, despite most seeing Blissey more as a tool in case eviolite isn't more valuable than imposter proof on certain structures.
read above about bias being sort of inevitable in what is essentially a pool of subjective ranking. i don't think i've said anywhere that blissey and regieleki are on the same tier of noobtrap, and i don't think i've said anywhere at all that blissey is a noobtrap, because it isn't - i just think chansey is kind of better, hence my hostility to blissey. regieleki is ultra ass and you will be laughed off the pitch for using moldy 4 hazards or whatever, blissey is just worse chansey in my eyes, which still can't do poorly because its a high-hp imposter, but can still do better imo. what this seems like is you extrapolating my dislike of blissey to "blissey is a noobtrap and you should be shamed for using it" because i'm not budging, which i don't really like because it simply isn't true.Final words. I might not be the smartest person in the site, and might also be impulsive as a player, but I can notice bias. Why? Because I study data analysis, and when bias is this severe it becomes easy to notice through mere looking at data, and treating Blissey as a noob trap like Regieleki when she's top 15 usage at all ranks with respectable viability ceiling, it just reeks double standard.
This ranking is here to help players to understand what does and does not work, to get how the meta actually is behaving. Saying "Blissey is bad because Chansey is always better" rather than "If you don't need imposter to cover X Chansey is better" is precisely that noob trap of thinking, failing to do the job of this thread to begin with of helping players to understand how the meta does and does not work...
i'm not deliberately avoiding these mentions for what it's worth - i just think you're picking probably the worst way to get me to pay attention to them, being open hostility. if i'm reading:And that's the reason I'm so insistent with what I do feel are more accurate rankings, because I DO WANT TO HELP NEW PLAYERS, that's why I do this tour tables despite them taking me like a dozen hours to complete, to help others to get a clearer broad picture.
Sorry If my manners weren't the appropiate, is just that I had so many stuff to say about the elder pink blob I notice you're deliverately avoiding to see. Hope you can understand my motives, Tea Guzzler.
"And you still keep pretending the 18% PR usage at top ranks of Blissey is not even worth a rank, let alone a B-one, despite clearly proving herself so many times to be a solid pokémon with reasons to be used over Chansey OR WITH, which is enough of a reason to rank a pokémon btw, even if outclassed in most cases or even all cases."
with the aggressive tone, exaggerated capital letters, etc. then i'm instantly finding it harder to take you seriously, since i'm now having to decide if this is a ragepost or actual criticism. just a formal nomination or a "hey, i think you missed blissey / the other imposter items" or something would be much easier for both of us to work with.