why are all the sets max hp and attack?
why not max attack and max speed with jolly so it can outspeed walls like slowbro?
why not max attack and max speed with jolly so it can outspeed walls like slowbro?
Because their is nothing that slowbrow can do to him that he fears. (Besides a scald burn)why are all the sets max hp and attack?
why not max attack and max speed with jolly so it can outspeed walls like slowbro?
Yeah, real mature there. Are you going to act like a six year old now and accuse me of getting my ass kicked by Escavalier? No, Escavalier never 6-0'd me because I never honestly met someone who would use Escavalier. I see Scizor much more often. And even if I met an escavalier, I don't see how it can sweep a team, with that incredibly low speed (with no technician bullet punch), and very shallow offensive movepool that most walls can take (skarmory and forretress says hi).Did he like 6-0 your team or something? Are you butthurt?
If not, then the reason is because IMO, I like him more, and I'd rather have a bulky/hardhitter then a scout which I already have filled on my team.
If you refer to a video I posted earlier in this thread, you'd see exactly what I mean.
Scizor is not flat out better, if it was then we wouldn't even be discussing this, we'd be in total agreement.
Maxing out that 20 base speed won't outspeed much, besides maybe slow walls, but it doesn't have trouble with them in the first place (unless they have a surprise HP fire). Giving max HP gives a substantial amount of bulk that ensures it can survive hits better.why are all the sets max hp and attack?
why not max attack and max speed with jolly so it can outspeed walls like slowbro?
The thing is, it is safe to do it to Escavalier. After an intimidate, escavalier's strongest attack is Return against Gyara, which is a 2-3HKO to 4/0 gyarados. Offensive Gyarados after a +1 is able to OHKO 252/4 Escavalier with stealth rock support with waterfall.
Ok, i'm going to dispute this stupid claim right now. A 4/0 Gyarados takes 45.9% - 54.1% from a Choice Band Return, which is a guranteed 2HKO with Stealth Rock, and even Megahorn pulls off the same task, shaving off 40.5% - 47.7%. Bulky Gyarados does fare a bit better, but still doesn't fidn the time to set up safely, having Return deal 36.8% - 43.5%, which I think is a slight chance of not 2HKOing with Stealth Rock, but Gyarados is getting no chance of setting up here. a Meaghorn definitley doesn't 2HKO, dealing 32.4% - 38.1%, but Gyarados is being left with around 18% of his HP remaining.
Because their is nothing that slowbrow can do to him that he fears. (Besides a scald burn)
I mean, he's so slow it's just better to annihilate whatever is attacking you on the next turn, or put it all into defenses so that you can stall/take the hit of whatever it is that you want really.
Yeah, real mature there. Are you going to act like a six year old now and accuse me of getting my ass kicked by Escavalier? No, Escavalier never 6-0'd me because I never honestly met someone who would use Escavalier. I see Scizor much more often. And even if I met an escavalier, I don't see how it can sweep a team, with that incredibly low speed (with no technician bullet punch), and very shallow offensive movepool that most walls can take (skarmory and forretress says hi).
And because "you like him more" is not a competitive reason why you would use something over something better. That's like saying, if you were playing chess, and your pawn was able to reach the other side of the board, you would rather have another bishop instead of another queen just because "you like diagonal man". No one ever won tournaments or beat professionals at this game because they just "liked" a certain pokemon. If that happened, you would see Pikachu fanboys win uber matches because they "liked" Pikachu.
If you think that Escavalier competes with Scizor for roles, show me the proof. If it competes with Scizor so bad, then why isn't its usage as high as Scizor? If people think it's as good as scizor, then where are the usage stats that SHOWS Escavalier are favored on teams more often?
And no, I'm not picking on Escavalier because it looks bad (as a matter of fact, I think it's a very creative idea for a pokemon), but because there are just better pokemon out there. I'm not saying it's a bad pokemon (it's good for an attacker), it's just that Scizor is better. It was like Blaziken vs. Infernape. Sure, Blaziken had great mixed stats, an awesome typing, and a very wide movepool, but Infernape was just better than it at doing its job. That's why Blaziken was UU, and Infernape was OU. If Infernape never existed, then I'm positive Blaziken would be OU.
Look, I'm done explaining to you this shit. I have no problem with you using it, or anyone else using it as a matter of fact. I'm only here to say that Scizor can perform this guy's role so much better. Show me multiple reasons why Escavalier can be better, or find a niche set Scizor cannot perform or outclass it in, then I'll be convinced.
Maxing out that 20 base speed won't outspeed much, besides maybe slow walls, but it doesn't have trouble with them in the first place (unless they have a surprise HP fire). Giving max HP gives a substantial amount of bulk that ensures it can survive hits better.
It is not directly outclassed due to one move: Megahorn. If you want a "Scout" (as good as scouts can be this gen due to team preview) then you want CB Scizor. If you want a bulky SD sweeper, you want Specially Defensive Scizor. If you want a Trick Room Sweeper, you pick Escavalier. If you want to spam Megahorn (while still checking most threats Scizor does as well), you use Escavalier. The raw power of Megahorn is what sets it apart. It is by no means useless, but for the average team, Scizor is generally better.
A better comparison would be picking Machamp over Conkeldurr. If you don't want the priority of Mach Punch, and you don't want to attempt a sweep with Bulk Up, why not? There are still positives, even if the average team prefers Conkeldurr.
Did you even read my earlier posts? I already know of megahorn and TR abuse, as well as extra bulk.
Did you even read my earlier posts? I already know of megahorn and TR abuse, as well as extra bulk. Those are small niches that Escavalier has over Scizor, but in the long run, it isn't worth it. (except for TR abuse, that's some good shit).
Then why do you keep asking for more reasons to use him? Scizor is easier to fit on any average team, but Excavalier can provide the insane power that some teams would rather prefer. It's sorta like Hydreigon and Latios: Latios may be able to fit on the average team with more ease, but Hyderigon has many perks that make it a viable option for some teams.
this thing is a freaking setup bait for magnezone lol.
You're absolutely correct there. Escavalier DOES have its perks over scizor, which I already said in several posts ago. As I have said before, it is just not enough. Megahorn, better defenses, slightly higher attack, and TR abuse is not enough to make it stand out from scizor. There are instances that Escavalier is better than scizor for some teams. However, I can't think of any team that would prefer Esca instead of Scizor. (besides trick room, once again)
Then, please, stop saying "he's outclassed, he's out classed, he's outclassed"You're absolutely correct there. Escavalier DOES have its perks over scizor, which I already said in several posts ago. As I have said before, it is just not enough. Megahorn, better defenses, slightly higher attack, and TR abuse is not enough to make it stand out from scizor. There are instances that Escavalier is better than scizor for some teams. However, I can't think of any team that would prefer Esca instead of Scizor. (besides trick room, once again)
Also, just a small nitpick. Hydreigon and Latios are too different to compare to Scizor and Escavalier.
Team's that already have a scout, bulky teams, stall teams, damage sponge, toxic spreader, trick room counter...You do realise you are contradicting yourself right?
You can't say both "Escavalier DOES have its perks over scizor" and "it is just not enough" because a perk the definition of it being enough.
You can't say both "Escavalier DOES have its perks over scizor" and "it is just not enough" because a perk the definition of it being enough.
Then, please, stop saying "he's outclassed, he's out classed, he's outclassed"
The point is to discuss him, if it means a comparison, that's fine, just don't endlessly repeat "he's out classed" over and over. Also, don't act like you have a personal vendetta against the guy, the reason people are attacking you is because you're posts are hostile, so we post hostile responses.
Flamethrower says hi, but really it's not worth it to invest in speed, when you can invest in HP and or SpD and take special hits better.Because their is nothing that slowbrow can do to him that he fears. (Besides a scald burn)
I mean, he's so slow it's just better to annihilate whatever is attacking you on the next turn, or put it all into defenses so that you can stall/take the hit of whatever it is that you want really.
Oh crap, thats right.Flamethrower says hi, but really it's not worth it to invest in speed, when you can invest in HP and or SpD and take special hits better.
Even on trickroom the thing is not doing much to swiftnite... it can stall out the 5 turns of trick room or simply phase it whenever it wants... granted that is ONE pokemon... but i just used it as an example... there are a few others that are just not very threatened by the guy... (cursepert loves trick room escavlier to set up on)
You do like the ellipsis a lot, don't you? Apart from that, almost every pokemon has its hard counters. Some don't, and as such, they have been banished to Ubers. That's not quite the valid point... And if you mispredict the kind of Escavalier you're facing, you most likely have yourslef a dead poke on your hands. Not what you usually want :P
No, it is not. A perk is when a pokemon has something over another pokemon. For example, Flareon has a higher attack than Arcanine. That's a perk flareon has. Is it enough to ensure that Arcanine is not used more/ouclasses it? No it isn't. Otherwise, you would see Flareon and Arcanine both equally being used.
I was hostile? LOL! I'm no longer taking you seriously anymore.
It's such a shame, Escavalier has a base 125 Attack, yet has nothing to show for it, except for Megahorn.