Wait, calm mind for scizor?
No Gyro Ball = No usage of Escavalier.
I will start using him as soon as he gets Gyro Ball though.
A friend of mine suggested HP Fighting.Gyro Ball actually would be a big boon to it. Neutral no speed 31 IV base 46 Pokemon are hit with a Gyro Ball of power equal to that of Iron Head.
Essentially, practically nothing exists that you would both use Iron Head on and is slower than base 46.
I'm not saying it's a necessity, but it would definitely be nice... Superpower would be more important though.
A friend of mine suggested HP Fighting.
I didn't know what to say in reply.
Escavalier must be like the only mon who has to rely on Rock Smash for coverage :O
Also Conkeldurr is base 45... so idk
True.Shoulda reminded them that Rock Smash would outdamage.
And as unique as Escavalier is, you'd think that Game Freak would give the chivalric beetle his own unique attack of some sort... but no such luck. Megahorn is really all he has. His movepool is severely holding him back, but I'm predicting the 3rd game will bring some useful Move Tutors, or give Escavalier a new Egg move. Namely, Superpower. It seems more likely than CC, considering Scizor, and would be extremely useful.^ Replace Giga Impact with Reversal/Return, Giga Impact does not provide any coverage, and can leave you open to set up sweepers or be killed during the charge up turn.
If only Escavalier actually had a usable movepool outside of Bug/Steel Stab attacks, Return, Rock Smash, and Reversal. A good move like Earthquake, Close Combat, or Flare Blitz can seriously make this guy a lot more useful.
I don't know, I mean it's not as if they both aim to do the same thing (unless you do a choice band esca/and or scizor in which case they are) so its not as if they are competing for roles most of the time.Still, I think Scizor somewhat outclasses Escavalier. Scizor has the Technician Bullet Punch to bypass its slow speed, and has Superpower/U-Turn in its arsenal. However, Escavalier is more bulky, and probably functions best under trick room conditions.
Does he take hits better?Both are bulky physical attackers that aim to hit the opponent hard. Esca and Scizor can both run a swords dance set that aims to sweep, and both can run a CB set. They can also both run a bulky spread. Scizor just does almost everything better.
._.
Does he take hits better?
Is he better on a trick room team?
Does he have a 120 BP Stab?
Counter does nothing to help Escavalier. He becomes set up fodder to Gyarados and others and isn't useful in any case. Gyarados is able to set up to +6 and completely maim esca with waterfall. Counter can help in places here and there, but not all the time. Also, Escavalier can't do anything to zapdos either.Plus he gets counter, which would allow him to say, maim Gyarados and make them think twice about setting up on Escavalier, and in general is useful vs. physical attackers when you can pretty much survive any hit with ease. Can you Remind me how well Scizor does against Gyarados, or Zapdos?
Yes, that's what I'm trying to aim for. But let's be honest here, salamence is better than dragonite at sweeping. It always was. Ever since 3rd gen. Dragonite just had a few niches that Salamence didn't, which is why it still had some usage. Dragonite had more bulk than salamence, had heal bell, thunder wave, screens, extremespeed, bolt beam, super power, fire punch, focus punch, and outrage (until platinum came out). That is more than enough to distinguish it from salamence. Escavalier does not have enough niches to make it stand out from scizor. It may be bulkier, and has megahorn, but why would you consider ever running Escavalier over Scizor (besides TR)? Scizor is flat out better (and also has the ability to scout, revenge kill, and bypass its slow speed). If it wasn't, you would see Escavalier have more usage than Scizor.I mean, you're kind of doing a dragonite vs salamence.
One's faster, one's bulkier, etc.
Counter does nothing to help Escavalier. He becomes set up fodder to Gyarados and others and isn't useful in any case. Gyarados is able to set up to +6 and completely maim esca with waterfall. Counter can help in places here and there, but not all the time. Also, Escavalier can't do anything to zapdos either.
If I were faced with a Escavalier, I wouldn't +6 to try and sweep unless I knew my opponent was stupid enough to let me do it, or he didn't have any other outs. In which case, who cares. It wouldn't be safe to try that. I'd be more than likely to try and get a +1-3, and try to hit hard with a STAB move, in which case Counter would help.
The thing is, it is safe to do it to Escavalier. After an intimidate, escavalier's strongest attack is Return against Gyara, which is a 2-3HKO to 4/0 defense gyarados. Bulky Gyarados after a +1 is able to OHKO Escavalier with stealth rock support with waterfall.
Bulky Gyarados after a +1 is able to OHKO 252/4 Escavalier with stealth rock support with waterfall.
Why would I ever consider running Escavalier over Scizor?Yes, that's what I'm trying to aim for. But let's be honest here, salamence is better than dragonite at sweeping. It always was. Ever since 3rd gen. Dragonite just had a few niches that Salamence didn't, which is why it still had some usage. Dragonite had more bulk than salamence, had heal bell, thunder wave, screens, extremespeed, bolt beam, super power, fire punch, focus punch, and outrage (until platinum came out). That is more than enough to distinguish it from salamence. Escavalier does not have enough niches to make it stand out from scizor. It may be bulkier, and has megahorn, but why would you consider ever running Escavalier over Scizor (besides TR)? Scizor is flat out better (and also has the ability to scout, revenge kill, and bypass its slow speed). If it wasn't, you would see Escavalier have more usage than Scizor.
Don't make stats up.The thing is, it is safe to do it to Escavalier. After an intimidate, escavalier's strongest attack is Return against Gyara, which is a 2-3HKO to 4/0 gyarados. Offensive Gyarados after a +1 is able to OHKO 252/4 Escavalier with stealth rock support with waterfall.