A while back, we wound up talking about Clefairy and the whole "was considered to be original mascot" thing and how weirdly proliferated it was as fact despite coming (seemingly) entirely from a Beckett magazine interview (?) with I believe one of the English arm people with no specific quotes transcribed. And some places would even go onto say that Pikachu was a "last minute" decision for the Anime.
It always seemed odd because despite lots of interviews about the franchise (both games & anime) over the years, it just never seemed to come up even though it feels like trivia that would be fun to talk about.
At this point bulbapedia has removed those references, but it always stuck with me. After all maybe that interview was actually very accurate & to the point, who could say? It'd be nice to have more closure on it. So I obviously did what any reasonable person would do and bought
Pokemon Story, a book from December 2000 accounting for the early history of the franchise, from Japan. I learned about this Book when Dogasu translated the portions pertaining to the Pokemon Shock incident, bringing the series over to America and he also translated the table of contents which had this specific thing catch my eye
And it's like, hello??? This is about as primary as a source could get short of a direct word for word interview. After obtaining the book (a pain) and finding a translator (also a pain), I got Aaron Riley (
www.thelanguagequest.com ) to translate the relevant pages for me.
I'll post the full transcription in the anime thread, but as for the stuff about Pikachu specifically
Ta-da!
Basically:
-GameFreak didn't give any specific edicts to begin with, and seemingly had no direct input on mascot status (or lack thereof)
-Pikachu was chosen by the anime pretty definitively in the planning stages. Clefairy was considered (& Jigglypuff, seemingly) but from the wording it sounds like it was just a brief consideration. Either way it definitely wasn't a "last minute" decision from what this implies
-Ironically it sounds like the manga (& I must underline here, this is referring to the Pocket Monsters manga with the talking Clefairy) influenced this decision a lot. It was the primary other major piece of ongoing Pokemon media at the time, so that makes sense. People focus on the Clefairy understandably, but Pikachu was added to the story in very short order and never left; it was basically the second main character (or third, I guess, after the trainer).
-Popularity polls also helped (and-speculation on my part- that was probably also influenced by the manga)
-The only person who seemed to actively suggest Clefairy was the guy representing CoroCoro
Now in fairness this is all focused on the Anime half of things, but glancing through the table of contents it doesn't seem like there's any point where they really talk about the manga or selecting a mascot before this. So there's always a chance they were like "yes, choose Clefairy for this manga, let's see how it cooks" and it's just in another untranslated part of this book or some other interview out there that's just been lost to time. But at least with respect to the media that would
define the franchise's mascot, Pikachu seemed like a hard lock.
So maybe not 100% Mystery Solved, but to me it's a solid Mystery Probably Understood.
The full section is pretty neat and has other details, I'll post it to the other thread in a minute.