Lmao I wanna troll this topic so badly atm.
All of you, both "sides" and all...relax.
I understand people might hate this meta, but I've almost infracted about 6 people I legitimately like in this topic for saying things like "I've played 15 games, this metagame sucks" and silly statements like that.
[22:22] <MysteryMan> unbanning pokemon causes metagame shifts that would possibly influence whether another pokemon is broken; if it's still broken, then it can be banned later, but if it's banned before, then it would either remain banned or we'd have to do another unban test
[22:23] <MysteryMan> none of the candidates for being unbanned provide support on the scale of something like drizzle that would break previously non-broken pokemon, as far as i can tell
[22:25] <MysteryMan> actually that came out kind of badly and means something different than i intended
[22:26] <MysteryMan> testing unbans first and banning later ensures that the banned pokemon are broken in the final metagame
[22:26] <MysteryMan> testing bans first and then unbanning leaves the possibility that something broken in the former metagame is no longer broken in the final metagame
[22:28] <MysteryMan> of course this goes out the window if something major like drizzle gets banned but i am trying to pretend we won't be such an angry mob that that would actually happen
I'm not actually pasting this as justification of the decision to test unban suspects before ban suspects, I'm pasting it so you realize this reasoning is sound AND that the opposite direction logic for the other side is valid as well: while this direction is concerned that things formerly banned might not be broken at the end, the opposite direction would be concerned that things formerly not broken at the end would be broken.
Both side's concerns are valid and there are positives to doing ban suspects first just as there are positives to doing unban suspects first.
This is literally the last time I expect to hear _any_ complaints about the direction we chose to take; if you want to whine about, expect a swift post deletion and a nice 2 point infraction. I know I have like 3 total infractions in 5 years of modding, but I might just be serious about this one.
I'll preface my following statement by throwing something out there in general: I'm starting to warm to the idea of Genesect, Deoxys-D, Drizzle, and possibly Drought as suspect. THAT SAID, I'm getting sick and tired of people constantly whining about their existence in the metagame...here is a fact: the metagame is balanced. Whether or not you like it is entirely subjective. If we wanted to, we could stop suspect tests here and say "we have a balanced metagame." However, we are working on suspect tests, and even possibly redefining broken as we go along, but this is a process that holds huge future consequences and therefore will take time.
Stop bitching.
Stop moaning.
Stop whining.
If you hate this metagame so much, you are welcome to stop playing it, but kindly shut the hell about it.
But, regarding Kyurem-B, judge if it is broken in the current metagame. If it isn't, just vote to unban and accept it. We'll get to the 4 thing I mentioned eventually, but assuming they'll be banned for sure down the road is exceptionally silly. And if they are banned, you have no idea if Kyurem-B would be broken in that metagame.
Honestly children.