So could I consider my location as a sweet spot for having diverse amounts of pokes in the future?
Speaking of that, I actually tried out Ingress in my phone. If you ask me as a tablet gamer, the ultimate test for me is if the games I get are NOT WI-FI dependent. I tried Ingress without Wi-Fi, it refuses to work. Same goes for Pokémon Shuffle when I tried it. That means, I end up only playing said games at my house with Wi-Fi. Being in a second or third world country with no city range Wi-Fi sucks for us since we cannot play Pokémon Go if that is the case. Despite some Micro-transactions Plants Vs Zombies 2 has, that game was one of my all time favorites just because of the ability to play it ANYWHERE I go with or without Wi-Fi. Rather, the Wi-fi functionality is optional. In the case of PvZ2, you only need Wi-fi to participate in daily Pinata Parties (if you win the Pinata Party event, you can just wait for the next day), or buy some of the plants, upgrades, extra cash or gems, or power-ups.
I just hope Niantic, Nintendo, and The Pokémon Company realize this. Not all Pokemon fans live in first world countries with great technological progress and Wi-Fi present throughout the city range.
What could consider as a glimmer of hope is seeing the trailer where the African-like father and child use said app in a mountain area where there is probably no Wi-Fi router. I hope Niantic makes Pokémon Go not Wi-Fi Dependent. If Pokémon Go does what I hope it does in terms of playability and less Wi-Fi reliance then I can bring it to the provinces and try to catch some pokemon there. Maybe I'll get a Mew there, or a Celebi. Too bad it will be difficult to get my favorite legendary. Plus, Victini just may be exclusive to the Statue of Liberty (AMERICA!! F*** YEAH!!!). Sigh... I just love referencing that very comical song.