So smash you would lynch VB basically just because he was our "second choice yesterday". Well I just went back and reread the thread, and he was as shitty a choice then as he is now. Lynching him is as valid as lynching UllarWarlord, idiotfrommars, or Agape. Let's not forget that a significant number of people who participated in the Walrein lynch flip-flopped between him and VB.
On the other hand I don't see why I'd be less certain now about aska than when I put him up yesterday. Since he was very clearly online earlier and didn't feel the point in defending himself, I know who I'm voting for.
##unvote
##vote askaninjask
You give me several concrete thought out reasons that VintageBooks looks scummy that can't be applied to 7 other players (myself included), and maybe that's where we'll go. Otherwise I want an aska lynch to go down. I only changed from DLE because he may be silenced.
My case repeated;
aska has not once but twice now started lynches for fairly undefined reasons. His vote against Walrein was literally because no one else had voted him, and yet it persisted through the roll on Walrein only changing for 7 minutes in what could conservatively be called a show.
He now adamantly insists upon lynching a player who no one has been able to clearly articulate as to why he'd be mafia. He feeds on the fact that we were close to a VB lynch last time and that we'd be afraid of not lynching someone. Well I'm more afraid of letting the mafia pull another one over us and ending up LYLO tomorrow, I say we do it right. People, think hard about why you are actually considering VB.
aska continually mixes up his facts so that they suit him best. He has done this at least twice to my knowledge in this turn alone. First he pretended that he was at fault for the Walrein lynch to appeal to emotion. Second he pretended that VB was at fault to orchestrate this lynch. Just read his only two posts today. If you do, you should know who to vote for.