The rule hasnt changed much, except it helps for situations like the Vikings/Saints playoff game last year. Id wish theyd go to the college method of overtime, but consider just having the team start at mid field instead of the 30 yard line. That would never happen though since it seems everybody else hates the college overtime rulesTo toot your own horn, indeed... Granted, next year will be due for a new thread anyway but for now who cares?
So yeah, not much going on. Roflsberger stuff? *shrug* Oh, how 'bout them new playoff OT rules? Why did they feel a change was needed and, if so, why only for playoff games?
The rule hasnt changed much, except it helps for situations like the Vikings/Saints playoff game last year. Id wish theyd go to the college method of overtime, but consider just having the team start at mid field instead of the 30 yard line. That would never happen though since it seems everybody else hates the college overtime rules
wouldnt you want to see it like that though? Even if they started at mid field, i think id rather see them go by the college method rather than the current NFL overtime way. It also wouldnt go on for ages if they went by the college method. That might be even more exciting if it goes into two or three overtimes if both teams either cant be stopped or continually stop each otherI'm glad that they realise the overtime system is flawed and all, and I see how it can potentially go on for ages if it is following college rules. However, why not modify the college rules so that after a certain number of possessions, the game is declared a draw. Ugh sometimes the NFL confuses me as to why they don't fix a blatantly obvious problem.
lol shin you don't know what you are talking about. of the 4 or 5 owners that voted against the rule, the vikings' owner was one of them.Should be called the Brett Farve rule, just because all the Vikings qqers and Farve fanboys believe he could have led them to some miracle super bowl berth if he had a chance to take the field...by this point, Farve was already pretty damn battered, I highly doubt he would have pulled off anything except getting intercepted again.
Should be called the Brett Farve rule, just because all the Vikings qqers and Farve fanboys believe he could have led them to some miracle super bowl berth if he had a chance to take the field...by this point, Farve was already pretty damn battered, I highly doubt he would have pulled off anything except getting intercepted again.
yeh that was my bad as well, but I dont see why they dont take a chance on implementing college OT into the NFL. I can see the argument against it, since college kickers for the majority arent very good past 40 yard field goals, while nfl kickers can kick 40 yarders in their sleep. However, if they started at mid field it eliminates that chip shot idea. The rules now are still pretty much the same, except it just forces teams that manage to get a field goal on the first drive are forced to get a stop back on defense.I wasn't very clear with my post. I should have said, why not modify the college OT rules slightly and then implement them into the NFL. Having said that, even the current college rules are much better then the shit going on with NFL OT.
HERP DERP I'M JUST GOING TO MAKE SOME WILD ACCUSATIONS THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO BASIS AND APPLY THEM TO A VAST NUMBER OF PEOPLE (it's like an even more retarded version of stereotyping, awesome!)
So yeah, the vast majority of people I know are more upset AT Favre for losing the fucking game, not some bullshit overtime complaint. You can go on believing some ridiculous lie, though.
4 against, and I do know one of them was the Vikings, I did find that a bit funny as well.lol shin you don't know what you are talking about. of the 4 or 5 owners that voted against the rule, the vikings' owner was one of them.